Young children with perforated appendicitis benefit from prompt appendectomy.


Journal

Journal of pediatric surgery
ISSN: 1531-5037
Titre abrégé: J Pediatr Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0052631

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Historique:
received: 27 07 2018
revised: 26 10 2018
accepted: 31 10 2018
pubmed: 15 1 2019
medline: 18 12 2019
entrez: 15 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To identify factors associated with nonoperative treatment failure in pediatric perforated appendicitis compared to immediate appendectomy. After IRB approval, between September 2016 and August 2017, prospective data were recorded for children (age: 1-18 years) with completed appendectomies and pathologist-confirmed perforations. Children were treated according to clinician-designated preference. Nonoperative treatment was considered failed if a nonresolving obstruction developed or any return of symptoms before the planned interval. The median time from pain onset to treatment initiation was 3 days (range: 1-14). Presentation on days 1 or 2 (early) was compared to day 3 or after(late). The nonoperatives were compared to appendectomies stratified by presentation time. Variables were compared by chi-square, Fisher exact or t-tests. Logistic regression evaluated for independence. Of 201 suspected perforations, 176 were included, 101 (57%) immediate appendectomies and 75 (43%) nonoperatives. Of 75, 24 (32%) failed; 6 (25%) in hospital, 18 (75%) after discharge. In 51 (68%), nonoperative treatment succeeded. Significantly younger children failed nonoperative treatment (p = 0.03). Failure was independently associated with treatment initiation within 2.75 days from pain onset (OR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.57-0.98) (p = 0.010) and lower WBC at presentation (OR: 0.03, 95% CI: 0.81-0.98) (p = 0.014). When compared to immediate appendectomy, nonoperatives had more morbidity. Younger children fail nonoperative treatment, perforate rapidly and have a significantly lower WBC, but benefit from immediate appendectomy. Treatment Study Level II.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
To identify factors associated with nonoperative treatment failure in pediatric perforated appendicitis compared to immediate appendectomy.
METHODS METHODS
After IRB approval, between September 2016 and August 2017, prospective data were recorded for children (age: 1-18 years) with completed appendectomies and pathologist-confirmed perforations. Children were treated according to clinician-designated preference. Nonoperative treatment was considered failed if a nonresolving obstruction developed or any return of symptoms before the planned interval. The median time from pain onset to treatment initiation was 3 days (range: 1-14). Presentation on days 1 or 2 (early) was compared to day 3 or after(late). The nonoperatives were compared to appendectomies stratified by presentation time. Variables were compared by chi-square, Fisher exact or t-tests. Logistic regression evaluated for independence.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 201 suspected perforations, 176 were included, 101 (57%) immediate appendectomies and 75 (43%) nonoperatives. Of 75, 24 (32%) failed; 6 (25%) in hospital, 18 (75%) after discharge. In 51 (68%), nonoperative treatment succeeded. Significantly younger children failed nonoperative treatment (p = 0.03). Failure was independently associated with treatment initiation within 2.75 days from pain onset (OR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.57-0.98) (p = 0.010) and lower WBC at presentation (OR: 0.03, 95% CI: 0.81-0.98) (p = 0.014). When compared to immediate appendectomy, nonoperatives had more morbidity.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Younger children fail nonoperative treatment, perforate rapidly and have a significantly lower WBC, but benefit from immediate appendectomy.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE METHODS
Treatment Study Level II.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30638663
pii: S0022-3468(18)30787-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.107
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1809-1814

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Amanda Munoz (A)

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, 11175 Campus Street, Room, 21111 Loma Linda, CA, USA. Electronic address: amamunoz@llu.edu.

Rajaie Hazboun (R)

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, 11175 Campus Street, Room, 21111 Loma Linda, CA, USA. Electronic address: r.hazboun@gmail.com.

Ian Vannix (I)

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, 11175 Campus Street, Room, 21111 Loma Linda, CA, USA. Electronic address: ivannix@llu.edu.

Victoria Pepper (V)

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, 11175 Campus Street, Room, 21111 Loma Linda, CA, USA. Electronic address: vpepper@llu.edu.

Tabitha Crane (T)

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, 11175 Campus Street, Room, 21111 Loma Linda, CA, USA. Electronic address: tcrane@llu.edu.

Edward Tagge (E)

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, 11175 Campus Street, Room, 21111 Loma Linda, CA, USA. Electronic address: etagge@llu.edu.

Donald Moores (D)

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, 11175 Campus Street, Room, 21111 Loma Linda, CA, USA. Electronic address: dmoores@llu.edu.

Joanne Baerg (J)

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, 11175 Campus Street, Room, 21111 Loma Linda, CA, USA. Electronic address: jbaerg@llu.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH