A Proposal for the Retrospective Identification and Categorization of Older People With Functional Impairments in Scientific Studies-Recommendations of the Medication and Quality of Life in Frail Older Persons (MedQoL) Research Group.
Functional status
assessment
concept paper
evidence-based medicine
frailty
Journal
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
ISSN: 1538-9375
Titre abrégé: J Am Med Dir Assoc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100893243
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
received:
07
07
2018
revised:
22
10
2018
accepted:
06
11
2018
pubmed:
15
1
2019
medline:
27
6
2020
entrez:
15
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
When treating older adults, a main factor to consider is physical frailty. Because specific assessments in clinical trials are frequently lacking, critical appraisal of treatment evidence with respect to functional status is challenging. Our aim was to identify and categorize assessments for functional status given in clinical trials in older adults to allow for a retrospective characterization and indirect comparison of treatment evidence from these cohorts. We conducted 4 separate systematic reviews of randomized and nonrandomized controlled clinical trials in older people with hypertension, diabetes, depression, and dementia. All assessments identified that reflected functional status were analyzed. Assessments were categorized across 4 different functional status levels. These levels span from functionally not impaired, slightly impaired, significantly impaired, to severely impaired/disabled. If available from the literature, cut-offs for these 4 functioning levels were extracted. If not, or if the existing cut-offs did not match the predefined functional levels, cut-off points were defined by an expert group composed of geriatricians, pharmacists, pharmacologists, neurologists, psychiatrists, and epidemiologists using a patient-centered approach. We identified 51 instruments that included measures of functional status. Although some of the assessments had clearly defined cut-offs across our predefined categories, many others did not. In most cases, no cut-offs existed for slightly impaired or severely impaired older adults. Missing cut-offs or values to adjust were determined by the expert group and are presented as described. The functional status assessments that were identified and operationalized across 4 functional levels could now be used for a retrospective characterization of functional status in randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Allocated categories only serve as approximations and should be validated head-to-head in future studies. Moreover, as general standard, upcoming studies involving older adults should include and explicitly report functional impairment as a baseline characteristic of all participants enrolled.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30638832
pii: S1525-8610(18)30640-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.11.008
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
138-146Investigateurs
Christine A F von Arnim
(CAF)
Jürgen M Bauer
(JM)
Claudia Bollig
(C)
Simone Brefka
(S)
Dhayana Dallmeier
(D)
Michael D Denkinger
(MD)
Annette Eidam
(A)
Walter E Haefeli
(WE)
Anette Lampert
(A)
Viktoria Mühlbauer
(V)
Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona
(C)
Hanna M Seidling
(HM)
Sebastian Voigt-Radloff
(S)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.