Projected impact, cost-effectiveness, and budget implications of rotavirus vaccination in Mongolia.
Budgets
Cost of Illness
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decision Support Techniques
Health Care Costs
/ statistics & numerical data
Health Policy
Humans
Immunization Programs
/ economics
Infant
Mongolia
Rotavirus Infections
/ economics
Rotavirus Vaccines
/ administration & dosage
Vaccination
/ economics
Vaccines, Attenuated
/ administration & dosage
Cost-effectiveness
DALY
ICER
Mongolia
Rotavirus
Vaccination
Journal
Vaccine
ISSN: 1873-2518
Titre abrégé: Vaccine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8406899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 02 2019
04 02 2019
Historique:
received:
03
09
2018
revised:
16
11
2018
accepted:
27
12
2018
pubmed:
15
1
2019
medline:
8
7
2020
entrez:
15
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Rotavirus disease in Mongolia is estimated to cause more than 50 deaths yearly and many more cases and hospitalizations. Mongolia must self-finance new vaccines and does not automatically access Gavi prices for vaccines. Given the country's limited resources for health, it is critical to assess potential new vaccine programs. This evaluation estimates the impact, cost-effectiveness, and budget implications associated with a nationwide rotavirus vaccine introduction targeting infants as part of the national immunization program in Mongolia, in order to inform decision-making around introduction. The analysis examines the use of the two-dose vaccine ROTARIX®, and three-dose vaccines ROTAVAC® and RotaTeq® compared to no vaccination from the government and the societal perspective. We use a modelling approach informed by local data and published literature to analyze the impact and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination over a ten-year time period starting in 2019, using a 3% discount rate. Our main outcome measure is the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed as US dollar per DALY averted. We assessed uncertainty around a series of parameters through univariate sensitivity analysis. Rotavirus vaccination in Mongolia could avert more than 95,000 rotavirus cases and 271 deaths, over 10 years. Averted visits and hospitalizations represent US$2.4 million in health care costs saved by the government. The vaccination program cost ranges from $6 to $11 million depending on vaccine choice. From the governmental perspective, ICER ranged from $412 to $1050 and from $77 to $715 when considering the societal perspective. Sensitivity analysis highlights vaccine price as the main driver of uncertainty. Introduction of rotavirus vaccination is likely to be highly cost-effective in Mongolia, with ICERs estimated at only a fraction of Mongolia's per capita GDP. From an economic standpoint, ROTAVAC® is the least costly and most cost-effective product choice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30639458
pii: S0264-410X(19)30025-8
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.12.056
pmc: PMC6357530
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
RIX4414 vaccine
0
RotaTeq
0
Rotavirus Vaccines
0
Vaccines, Attenuated
0
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
798-807Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Références
Vaccine. 2013 Jul 02;31 Suppl 3:C19-29
pubmed: 23777686
Vaccine. 2018 Nov 26;36(49):7472-7478
pubmed: 30420039
Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2013 Feb 1;88(5):49-64
pubmed: 23424730
Vaccine. 2018 Dec 14;36(51):7883-7887
pubmed: 29429811
Public Health Rep. 2007 Nov-Dec;122(6):811-6
pubmed: 18051674
Int J Infect Dis. 2011 Jul;15(7):e464-9
pubmed: 21524932
J Infect Dis. 2009 Nov 1;200 Suppl 1:S195-202
pubmed: 19817600
Vaccine. 2017 Feb 15;35(7):1055-1063
pubmed: 28109706
PLoS One. 2009 Jun 26;4(6):e6060
pubmed: 19557133
Lancet. 2010 Aug 21;376(9741):615-23
pubmed: 20692031
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Dec 1;94(12):925-930
pubmed: 27994285
Lancet. 2014 Jun 21;383(9935):2136-43
pubmed: 24629994
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Nov;3(11):e712-23
pubmed: 26475018
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 May 1;62 Suppl 2:S140-6
pubmed: 27059348
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 May 1;62 Suppl 2:S96-S105
pubmed: 27059362
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 11;12(9):e0183392
pubmed: 28892480
Vaccine. 2017 Jun 8;35(26):3364-3386
pubmed: 28504193