Age-related differences in judgments of reciprocal and unilateral prosocial behaviors.
Behavior prediction
Morality
Reciprocal prosocial behavior
Reciprocity
Trait evaluation
Unilateral prosocial behavior
Journal
Journal of experimental child psychology
ISSN: 1096-0457
Titre abrégé: J Exp Child Psychol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985128R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
received:
30
03
2018
revised:
12
11
2018
accepted:
13
11
2018
pubmed:
15
1
2019
medline:
27
6
2020
entrez:
15
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We examined age-related differences in evaluating reciprocal prosocial behavior (e.g., helping someone who has helped you) and unilateral prosocial behavior (e.g., helping someone who has previously refused your request for help). Participants were kindergarteners, second and fifth graders, and undergraduate students (N = 110). We examined the trait evaluations of reciprocal and unilateral prosocial protagonists, behavior predictions of the participants in reciprocal and unilateral situations, and behavior predictions of others (including reciprocal and unilateral protagonists and others known to the participants) in reciprocal and unilateral prosocial situations. Results revealed that most kindergarteners did not focus on whether help was reciprocal or unilateral, and there were no clear differences in trait evaluations or predicted reciprocal or unilateral prosocial behaviors. In contrast, older children and undergraduates tended to focus on the difference between reciprocal and unilateral help. They evaluated unilateral protagonists more positively than reciprocal protagonists, and they judged the likelihood that others would engage in unilateral prosocial behaviors as lower than the likelihood that they would engage in reciprocal behaviors. However, most participants, regardless of age, predicted that they themselves would act prosocially in both reciprocal and unilateral situations. We discuss how the current results have implications for research on age-related trends in evaluating reciprocity and morality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30639769
pii: S0022-0965(18)30189-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.009
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
69-86Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.