Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Papilledema Compared With Pseudopapilledema.
Adult
Eye Diseases, Hereditary
/ diagnosis
Female
Fluorescein Angiography
/ methods
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Nerve Fibers
/ pathology
Optic Disk
/ blood supply
Optic Nerve Diseases
/ diagnosis
Papilledema
/ diagnosis
Prospective Studies
Retinal Ganglion Cells
/ pathology
Tomography, Optical Coherence
/ methods
Young Adult
Journal
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science
ISSN: 1552-5783
Titre abrégé: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7703701
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 01 2019
02 01 2019
Historique:
entrez:
15
1
2019
pubmed:
15
1
2019
medline:
25
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study is to evaluate differences in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) findings between patients with papilledema and pseudopapilledema. In this prospective, comparative study, 41 eyes of 21 subjects with papilledema, 27 eyes of 15 subjects with pseudopapilledema, and 44 eyes of 44 healthy normal subjects were included and were imaged using OCT-A. In addition to peripapillary total vasculature maps obtained with commercial vessel density mapping, major vessel removal using customized image analysis software was also used to measure whole image capillary density and peripapillary capillary density (PCD). Peripapiilary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) were recorded. Average RNFL thicknesses were greater in papilledema eyes than in pseudopapilledema and control subjects. GCC thickness was not different among three groups. Peripapillary vasculature values were significantly lower in papilledema (58.5 ± 6.1%) and pseudopapilledema (58.9 ± 4.7%) eyes compared with healthy eyes (63.2 ± 3.1%) using commercial machine software, without a difference between papilledema and pseudopapilledema eyes. However, using our customized software, peripapillary "capillary" density of papilledema eyes was 29.8 ± 9.4%, which was not significantly different from healthy subjects (31.8 ± 7.4%; P = 0.94). Pseudopapilledema eyes with peripapillary density of 25.5 ± 8.3% had significantly lower capillary values compared with control eyes (P = 0.01). There was a significantly lower whole image and nasal sector peripapillary capillary density of inner retina in pseudopapilledema eyes than papilledema eyes (P = 0.03 and P = 0.02, respectively). Whole image and nasal peripapillary sector capillary densities using OCT-A had diagnostic accuracy for differentiating true and pseudo-disc swelling.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30640969
pii: 2720822
doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-25453
pmc: PMC6333108
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
168-175Références
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1982 Jan;45(1):13-8
pubmed: 7062066
Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;101(8):1045-1051
pubmed: 28057645
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Mar;89(3):294-8
pubmed: 15722307
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2017 Aug 17;17(10):74
pubmed: 28819712
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;168:237-249
pubmed: 27296492
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Jul 1;57(9):OCT27-36
pubmed: 27409483
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Jun;56(6):3850-9
pubmed: 26070058
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;191:116-123
pubmed: 29733809
Ophthalmology. 2017 Dec;124(12):1839-1848
pubmed: 28732589
Ophthalmology. 2011 May;118(5):971-7
pubmed: 21211843
J Neuroophthalmol. 2019 Mar;39(1):28-34
pubmed: 29474199
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016 Jan;50:108-44
pubmed: 26453995
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;133(1):45-50
pubmed: 25317632
J Glaucoma. 2017 Sep;26(9):845-849
pubmed: 28767460
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;158(1):136-43
pubmed: 24727146
J Neuroophthalmol. 2011 Jun;31(2):175-86
pubmed: 21593630
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):e0189237
pubmed: 29320503
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jan 03;53(1):1-6
pubmed: 22110073
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2018 Mar-Apr;7(2):84-89
pubmed: 29165935
Br J Ophthalmol. 1977 Jun;61(6):385-9
pubmed: 871465
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 May 1;136(5):507-513
pubmed: 29621390
Semin Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep-Nov;25(5-6):198-205
pubmed: 21091000
Ophthalmic Res. 2018;59(2):76-80
pubmed: 29186723
J Neuroophthalmol. 2012 Mar;32(1):17-22
pubmed: 21926917
Ophthalmology. 2016 Dec;123(12):2498-2508
pubmed: 27726964