Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone for the Management of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) without prior use of chemotherapy: report from a large, international, real-world retrospective cohort study.
Abiraterone Acetate
/ administration & dosage
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ adverse effects
Comorbidity
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Staging
Prednisone
/ administration & dosage
Proportional Hazards Models
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant
/ drug therapy
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Abiraterone acetate
Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Real-world evidence
Time to treatment failure
Journal
BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Jan 2019
14 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
30
08
2018
accepted:
07
01
2019
entrez:
16
1
2019
pubmed:
16
1
2019
medline:
24
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
With the recent introduction of novel treatment options, real-world data from patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are required to better understand the impact on routine clinical practice. This study primarily aimed to describe the time to treatment failure (TTF) of mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or the corticosteroid of choice (AAP) in the pre-chemotherapy setting. Other relevant outcomes, clinical and treatment characteristics of these patients were also evaluated. This retrospective, observational study collected data from chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients treated with AAP from four European countries. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate TTF, progression-free survival (PFS), and time to first skeletal-related event. The impact of baseline characteristics on TTF and PFS was explored using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Log-rank test was used to assess the potential role of duration of response to ADT in predicting response to AAP treatment. Data from 481 eligible patients (Belgium: 68; France: 61; Germany: 150; UK: 202) were analysed. At AAP initiation, the median age of patients was 75.0 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 69.0-81.0), and the median PSA was 56.2 ng/mL (IQR: 22.2-133.1), with over 50% of patients presenting an ECOG score of 0 or 1. Visceral metastases were present in 7.5% of patients; an exclusion criterion in the COU-AA-302 clinical trial. The median TTF with AAP was 10.0 months (95%CI: 9.2-11.1) and the median PFS was 10.8 months (95%CI: 9.6-11.8). Shorter TTF was significantly associated with higher ALP (> 119 units/L), higher PSA (> 56.2 ng/mL), or poorer ECOG PS scores at AAP initiation (p < 0.05). Patients with longer duration of response to ADT (≥12 months) presented longer TTF and longer time to progression (p < 0.0001). This European real-world study provides valuable insights into the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of chemotherapy-naïve patients with mCRPC who received AAP in routine clinical practice. Treatment effectiveness of AAP in the real-world is maintained despite patients having poorer clinical features at initiation than those observed in the COU-AA-302 trial population.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
With the recent introduction of novel treatment options, real-world data from patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are required to better understand the impact on routine clinical practice. This study primarily aimed to describe the time to treatment failure (TTF) of mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or the corticosteroid of choice (AAP) in the pre-chemotherapy setting. Other relevant outcomes, clinical and treatment characteristics of these patients were also evaluated.
METHODS
METHODS
This retrospective, observational study collected data from chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients treated with AAP from four European countries. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate TTF, progression-free survival (PFS), and time to first skeletal-related event. The impact of baseline characteristics on TTF and PFS was explored using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Log-rank test was used to assess the potential role of duration of response to ADT in predicting response to AAP treatment.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Data from 481 eligible patients (Belgium: 68; France: 61; Germany: 150; UK: 202) were analysed. At AAP initiation, the median age of patients was 75.0 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 69.0-81.0), and the median PSA was 56.2 ng/mL (IQR: 22.2-133.1), with over 50% of patients presenting an ECOG score of 0 or 1. Visceral metastases were present in 7.5% of patients; an exclusion criterion in the COU-AA-302 clinical trial. The median TTF with AAP was 10.0 months (95%CI: 9.2-11.1) and the median PFS was 10.8 months (95%CI: 9.6-11.8). Shorter TTF was significantly associated with higher ALP (> 119 units/L), higher PSA (> 56.2 ng/mL), or poorer ECOG PS scores at AAP initiation (p < 0.05). Patients with longer duration of response to ADT (≥12 months) presented longer TTF and longer time to progression (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This European real-world study provides valuable insights into the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of chemotherapy-naïve patients with mCRPC who received AAP in routine clinical practice. Treatment effectiveness of AAP in the real-world is maintained despite patients having poorer clinical features at initiation than those observed in the COU-AA-302 trial population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30642291
doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5280-6
pii: 10.1186/s12885-019-5280-6
pmc: PMC6332550
doi:
Substances chimiques
Abiraterone Acetate
EM5OCB9YJ6
Prednisone
VB0R961HZT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
60Subventions
Organisme : Janssen Pharmaceutica NV
ID : n/a
Références
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 10;368(2):138-48
pubmed: 23228172
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):152-60
pubmed: 25601341
Ann Oncol. 2015 Aug;26(8):1589-604
pubmed: 26041764
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(14):1946-52
pubmed: 26208462
Urol Oncol. 2016 Jul;34(7):291.e1-7
pubmed: 26971191
BMC Urol. 2016 Mar 22;16:12
pubmed: 27001043
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):630-642
pubmed: 27591931
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Feb;23(2):225-235
pubmed: 28125362