Accuracy and practicability of a patient-specific guide using acetabular superolateral rim during THA in Crowe II/III DDH patients: a retrospective study.
Acetabulum
/ diagnostic imaging
Adult
Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
/ instrumentation
Female
Hip Dislocation, Congenital
/ diagnostic imaging
Hip Prosthesis
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Preoperative Care
/ methods
Prosthesis Design
Radiography
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Young Adult
Artificial acetabulum
Developmental dysplasia of the hip
Patient-specific instrument
Personalized operation
Total hip arthroplasty
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Jan 2019
14 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
04
10
2018
accepted:
04
12
2018
entrez:
16
1
2019
pubmed:
16
1
2019
medline:
7
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It is challenging to create an ideal artificial acetabulum during total hip arthroplasty (THA) in adult DDH. Our team developed a new patient-specific instrument (PSI) that uses the superolateral rim of the acetabulum as a positioning mark to assist in the production of an artificial acetabulum in adult Crowe II/III DDH patients. The purpose of this retrospective study is to verify whether this new PSI can be used to implement the preoperative plan accurately and quickly to create an ideal artificial acetabulum during THA in adult Crowe II/III DDH patients. We selected suitable adult Crowe II/III DDH patients from the registration system for artificial joint surgery at our hospital during April 2016 to March 2018 who underwent THA assisted by a PSI using the superolateral rim of the acetabulum as a positioning mark. We retrospectively analyzed data, including preoperative and postoperative anteversion, inclination, postoperative bilateral rotator center discrepancy (BRCD), surgery time, and the incidence of neurovascular injury. All patients underwent follow-up, and their Harris hip score (HHS) and X-ray data were recorded. Then, we performed statistical analyses on the data described above. A total of 20 hip surgeries from 17 patients were included in our study. All patients underwent a successful operation assisted by the PSI. The mean anteversion of the cup in our preoperative plan was 15.1° (range, 10.0° to 20.0°), while the mean postoperative anteversion of the cup was 15.3° (range, 7.0° to 28.6°). The mean inclination of the cup in our preoperative plan was 44.7° (range, 40.0° to 50.0°), while the mean postoperative inclination of the cup was 45.6° (range, 35.0° to 57.6°). Paired-samples t test revealed no significant differences in anteversion and inclination between pre- and postoperation times (P > 0.05). The mean BRCD was 3.38 ± 3.0 mm (range, 0.5 to 11.0 mm). The average operation time was 105.1 ± 15.4 min, and no patients had neurovascular injury complications. All patients' acetabular components appeared clinically and radiologically stable after surgery. The mean HHS values were significantly improved at 12 weeks (P < 0.05) and 24 weeks (P < 0.05) postoperatively compared to the preoperative mean scores. The new PSI is accurate and practical to create an ideal artificial acetabulum during THA in adult Crowe II/III DDH patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
It is challenging to create an ideal artificial acetabulum during total hip arthroplasty (THA) in adult DDH. Our team developed a new patient-specific instrument (PSI) that uses the superolateral rim of the acetabulum as a positioning mark to assist in the production of an artificial acetabulum in adult Crowe II/III DDH patients. The purpose of this retrospective study is to verify whether this new PSI can be used to implement the preoperative plan accurately and quickly to create an ideal artificial acetabulum during THA in adult Crowe II/III DDH patients.
METHODS
METHODS
We selected suitable adult Crowe II/III DDH patients from the registration system for artificial joint surgery at our hospital during April 2016 to March 2018 who underwent THA assisted by a PSI using the superolateral rim of the acetabulum as a positioning mark. We retrospectively analyzed data, including preoperative and postoperative anteversion, inclination, postoperative bilateral rotator center discrepancy (BRCD), surgery time, and the incidence of neurovascular injury. All patients underwent follow-up, and their Harris hip score (HHS) and X-ray data were recorded. Then, we performed statistical analyses on the data described above.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 20 hip surgeries from 17 patients were included in our study. All patients underwent a successful operation assisted by the PSI. The mean anteversion of the cup in our preoperative plan was 15.1° (range, 10.0° to 20.0°), while the mean postoperative anteversion of the cup was 15.3° (range, 7.0° to 28.6°). The mean inclination of the cup in our preoperative plan was 44.7° (range, 40.0° to 50.0°), while the mean postoperative inclination of the cup was 45.6° (range, 35.0° to 57.6°). Paired-samples t test revealed no significant differences in anteversion and inclination between pre- and postoperation times (P > 0.05). The mean BRCD was 3.38 ± 3.0 mm (range, 0.5 to 11.0 mm). The average operation time was 105.1 ± 15.4 min, and no patients had neurovascular injury complications. All patients' acetabular components appeared clinically and radiologically stable after surgery. The mean HHS values were significantly improved at 12 weeks (P < 0.05) and 24 weeks (P < 0.05) postoperatively compared to the preoperative mean scores.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The new PSI is accurate and practical to create an ideal artificial acetabulum during THA in adult Crowe II/III DDH patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30642333
doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-1029-1
pii: 10.1186/s13018-018-1029-1
pmc: PMC6332857
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Video-Audio Media
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
19Références
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Mar;84(2):269-72
pubmed: 11922371
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Sep;438:171-6
pubmed: 16131887
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Dec;89(12):2819-27
pubmed: 18056516
Acta Radiol. 2009 Sep;50(7):791-7
pubmed: 19629771
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep;25(6):986-9
pubmed: 19837559
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Dec;91(12):2880-5
pubmed: 19952251
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):319-29
pubmed: 20717858
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):412-6
pubmed: 20737303
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2010 Sep;11(9):673-80
pubmed: 20803771
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec;26(8):1432-7
pubmed: 21296551
J Orthop Surg Res. 2011 Jun 22;6:32
pubmed: 21696624
Int J Med Robot. 2011 Dec;7(4):469-74
pubmed: 22113980
Orthopedics. 2012 Sep;35(9):e1307-13
pubmed: 22955394
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Oct 3;94(19):1809-21
pubmed: 23032592
Orthopedics. 2013 May;36(5):e601-5
pubmed: 23672912
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jan;29(1):167-71
pubmed: 23711798
J Arthroplasty. 2014 May;29(5):1030-7
pubmed: 24231437
Bone Joint J. 2014 Mar;96-B(3):312-8
pubmed: 24589784
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Nov 19;96(22):1878-82
pubmed: 25410505
Bone Joint J. 2015 Feb;97-B(2):164-72
pubmed: 25628277
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015 Oct;10(10):1547-56
pubmed: 25877209
J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Mar 18;10:36
pubmed: 25889223
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Nov;30(11):1963-70
pubmed: 26129852
Lab Chip. 2016 Jan 21;16(2):291-7
pubmed: 26646354
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2085-93
pubmed: 27150344
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Sep 7;98(17):e72
pubmed: 27605697
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):843-848
pubmed: 27965176
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Jun;103(4):531-536
pubmed: 28323248
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Sep 6;99(17):e92
pubmed: 28872534
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018 Jan;15(1):81-89
pubmed: 29206497
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jun;33(6):1833-1837
pubmed: 29502961
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7):2197-2202
pubmed: 29573918
Int J Pharm. 2018 Jul 10;545(1-2):144-152
pubmed: 29705104
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969 Jun;51(4):737-55
pubmed: 5783851
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Mar;60(2):217-20
pubmed: 641088