A systems approach reveals urban pollinator hotspots and conservation opportunities.
Journal
Nature ecology & evolution
ISSN: 2397-334X
Titre abrégé: Nat Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101698577
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
14
08
2017
accepted:
23
11
2018
pubmed:
16
1
2019
medline:
31
5
2019
entrez:
16
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Urban areas are often perceived to have lower biodiversity than the wider countryside, but a few small-scale studies suggest that some urban land uses can support substantial pollinator populations. We present a large-scale, well-replicated study of floral resources and pollinators in 360 sites incorporating all major land uses in four British cities. Using a systems approach, we developed Bayesian network models integrating pollinator dispersal and resource switching to estimate city-scale effects of management interventions on plant-pollinator community robustness to species loss. We show that residential gardens and allotments (community gardens) are pollinator 'hotspots': gardens due to their extensive area, and allotments due to their high pollinator diversity and leverage on city-scale plant-pollinator community robustness. Household income was positively associated with pollinator abundance in gardens, highlighting the influence of socioeconomic factors. Our results underpin urban planning recommendations to enhance pollinator conservation, using increasing city-scale community robustness as our measure of success.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30643247
doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0769-y
pii: 10.1038/s41559-018-0769-y
pmc: PMC6445365
mid: EMS80640
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
363-373Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 22;100(15):8788-92
pubmed: 12847293
Science. 2008 Feb 8;319(5864):756-60
pubmed: 18258902
Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63
pubmed: 18481363
PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5574
pubmed: 19440367
Ecol Lett. 2010 Apr;13(4):442-52
pubmed: 20100244
Ecol Lett. 2010 Jul;13(7):891-9
pubmed: 20482578
J Anim Ecol. 2011 Mar;80(2):484-94
pubmed: 21155772
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23459
pubmed: 21858128
Science. 2012 Feb 24;335(6071):973-7
pubmed: 22363009
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 2;109(40):16083-8
pubmed: 22988086
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Feb 12;281(1780):20133330
pubmed: 24523278
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 13;9(8):e104679
pubmed: 25118722
Science. 2014 Sep 26;345(6204):1558-60
pubmed: 25258063
Science. 2014 Dec 12;346(6215):1360-2
pubmed: 25504719
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Apr;21(4):1652-67
pubmed: 25620599
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 22;282(1803):20142849
pubmed: 25673686
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Apr 22;282(1805):null
pubmed: 25808886
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Nov;30(11):673-684
pubmed: 26437633
J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Sep;38(3):e336-e344
pubmed: 26515229
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 5;113(1):146-51
pubmed: 26621730
Nature. 2016 Feb 4;530(7588):85-8
pubmed: 26842058
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 24;11(6):e0158117
pubmed: 27341588
Conserv Biol. 2017 Feb;31(1):24-29
pubmed: 27624925
Ecology. 2016 Nov;97(11):2952-2963
pubmed: 27870023
Science. 2016 Nov 25;354(6315):975-976
pubmed: 27884996
Nature. 2016 Dec 8;540(7632):220-229
pubmed: 27894123
PeerJ. 2017 Mar 7;5:e3051
pubmed: 28286711
Nature. 2017 Aug 10;548(7666):206-209
pubmed: 28783730
Biol Lett. 2018 May;14(5):
pubmed: 29743266