Total Hip Arthroplasty for Hip Fractures: Time to Surgery With Respect to Surgical Revision, Failure, and Mortality.
arthroplasty
hip fractures
mortality
revision
time to surgery
Journal
Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation
ISSN: 2151-4585
Titre abrégé: Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101558150
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
03
08
2018
revised:
23
09
2018
accepted:
05
11
2018
entrez:
16
1
2019
pubmed:
16
1
2019
medline:
16
1
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There are increasing demands to perform surgery of hip fractures without delay. However, few studies have assessed the time to surgery in relation to outcome measurements. A total of 643 consecutive patients with a minimum age of 60 years underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) for an intracapsular hip fracture. For this retrospective case series, demographic data and the outcome measurements-(1) any surgical revision, (2) implant failure, and (3) mortality-were documented from a prospective clinical database. The time from admission to surgery was also documented prospectively and then data were divided into 4 groups according to the time of surgery: (1) within 12 hours, (2) >12 to 24 hours, (3) >24 to 48 hours, and (4) later than >48 hours. The study end point was 2 years after surgery. Final evaluation was conducted for any missing data through a telephone interview. The patients comprised 456 women (70.9%) and 187 men (29.1%) with a mean age of 80.2 years (range 60-104 years; standard deviation ±7.4). Descriptive data were without effect in all 4 groups. Time to surgery did not significantly influence revision for any reason ( Time to surgery had no effect on revision for any reason, implant failure, and mortality in patients undergoing THA for an intracapsular hip fracture.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30643663
doi: 10.1177/2151459318818162
pii: 10.1177_2151459318818162
pmc: PMC6322097
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2151459318818162Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(4):271-8
pubmed: 11420776
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Jun;124(5):334-40
pubmed: 15095097
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov;(428):294-301
pubmed: 15534555
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Mar;87(3):483-9
pubmed: 15741611
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Mar;87(3):361-6
pubmed: 15773647
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Aug;87(8):1123-6
pubmed: 16049251
BMJ. 2006 Apr 22;332(7547):947-51
pubmed: 16554334
Can J Anaesth. 2008 Mar;55(3):146-54
pubmed: 18310624
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Oct;101(4):511-7
pubmed: 18723517
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Oct;90(10):1357-63
pubmed: 18827248
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Dec 29;9:171
pubmed: 19114019
Injury. 2009 Jul;40(7):692-7
pubmed: 19450802
Injury. 2012 Jun;43(6):676-85
pubmed: 21683355
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Aug 16;155(4):226-33
pubmed: 21844548
Unfallchirurg. 2013 Feb;116(2):131-7
pubmed: 21879302
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Nov;469(11):2992-4
pubmed: 21938532
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46175
pubmed: 23056256
Int Orthop. 2013 Jun;37(6):1135-40
pubmed: 23508867
Unfallchirurg. 2015 Sep;118(9):780-94
pubmed: 24352202
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 13;9(6):e99308
pubmed: 24926876
Bone Joint J. 2015 Mar;97-B(3):383-90
pubmed: 25737523
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Aug 19;97(16):1333-9
pubmed: 26290084
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Oct 28;15:141
pubmed: 26510919
JAMA. 2017 Nov 28;318(20):1994-2003
pubmed: 29183076
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1989 Jan;23(1):8-12
pubmed: 2926716
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1979 Oct;95(1-2):47-9
pubmed: 526126
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Oct;77(10):1551-6
pubmed: 7593064
Bone. 1996 Jan;18(1 Suppl):57S-63S
pubmed: 8717549