The State of Peripheral Blood Natural Killer Cells and Cytotoxicity in Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Unexplained Infertility.
CD56+
Infertility
Perforin
Peripheral Natural Killer Cell
Recurrent Miscarriage
Journal
International journal of fertility & sterility
ISSN: 2008-076X
Titre abrégé: Int J Fertil Steril
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101487941
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
11
03
2018
accepted:
02
07
2018
entrez:
16
1
2019
pubmed:
16
1
2019
medline:
16
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The prognostic value of peripheral natural killer (pNK) cells, as a screening test in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and unexplained infertility, is still a matter for discussion. The purpose of this study was to compare the percentage of circulating CD56 In this case-control study, the percentage of CD56 The percentage of CD56 An increased percentage of CD56
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The prognostic value of peripheral natural killer (pNK) cells, as a screening test in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and unexplained infertility, is still a matter for discussion. The purpose of this study was to compare the percentage of circulating CD56
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
In this case-control study, the percentage of CD56
RESULTS
RESULTS
The percentage of CD56
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
An increased percentage of CD56
Identifiants
pubmed: 30644239
doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2019.5503
pmc: PMC6334012
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
12-17Informations de copyright
Copyright© by Royan Institute. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 1999 Aug;21(3):565-82
pubmed: 10466080
Hum Reprod. 2000 May;15(5):1163-9
pubmed: 10783371
J Reprod Immunol. 2000 Jul;47(2):87-103
pubmed: 10924744
J Biol Chem. 2001 Mar 9;276(10):7312-9
pubmed: 11036086
Hum Reprod. 2001 May;16(5):855-61
pubmed: 11331628
Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18(4):433-40
pubmed: 11355802
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2001 Nov;46(5):318-22
pubmed: 11712759
J Reprod Immunol. 2002 Jul-Aug;56(1-2):111-21
pubmed: 12106887
Nat Rev Immunol. 2002 Sep;2(9):656-63
pubmed: 12209134
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002 Aug;78(2):179-90
pubmed: 12360906
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003 Feb;20(2):58-62
pubmed: 12688589
Fertil Steril. 2003 Aug;80(2):368-75
pubmed: 12909501
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2003 Oct;50(4):351-4
pubmed: 14672340
BMJ. 2004 Nov 27;329(7477):1283-5
pubmed: 15564263
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2004 Dec;52(6):379-85
pubmed: 15663603
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2005 Mar;53(3):126-31
pubmed: 15727566
Hum Reprod. 2005 May;20(5):1272-6
pubmed: 15829490
Mol Hum Reprod. 2005 Jun;11(6):451-7
pubmed: 15955778
Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2007;45 Suppl 1:S73-7
pubmed: 18292839
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2008 Jul;60(1):66-74
pubmed: 18593439
Am J Pathol. 2008 Sep;173(3):653-64
pubmed: 18688023
Reprod Biomed Online. 2008 Dec;17(6):814-9
pubmed: 19079966
Pak J Biol Sci. 2007 Sep 1;10(17):2885-9
pubmed: 19090193
Hum Reprod. 2010 Jan;25(1):52-8
pubmed: 19819893
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010 Feb;63(2):173-80
pubmed: 20064145
Hum Reprod. 2011 Aug;26(8):1971-80
pubmed: 21613313
Fertil Steril. 2013 Jan;99(1):63
pubmed: 23095139
Fertil Steril. 2013 Dec;100(6):1629-34
pubmed: 24012195
Cell. 1986 Mar 28;44(6):849-59
pubmed: 2420467
Hum Reprod Update. 2014 May-Jun;20(3):429-38
pubmed: 24285824
Iran J Immunol. 2014 Jun;11(2):84-96
pubmed: 24975965
J Exp Med. 1988 May 1;167(5):1572-85
pubmed: 3259252
Lancet. 1995 May 27;345(8961):1340-2
pubmed: 7752757
J Exp Med. 1994 Nov 1;180(5):1999-2004
pubmed: 7964477
J Immunol. 1994 May 1;152(9):4255-61
pubmed: 8157952
J Biol Chem. 1996 Feb 23;271(8):4127-33
pubmed: 8626751
Am J Reprod Immunol. 1996 Apr;35(4):376-82
pubmed: 8739457
Hum Immunol. 1996 Sep 1;49(2):130-6
pubmed: 8872167
J Exp Med. 1997 Mar 3;185(5):855-66
pubmed: 9120391