Oral Candida administration in a Clostridium difficile mouse model worsens disease severity but is attenuated by Bifidobacterium.
Administration, Oral
Animals
Bifidobacterium
/ physiology
Caco-2 Cells
Candida albicans
/ pathogenicity
Clostridium Infections
/ microbiology
Disease Models, Animal
Gastrointestinal Microbiome
/ physiology
HT29 Cells
Humans
Interleukin-8
/ biosynthesis
Intestinal Mucosa
/ microbiology
Male
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Mycobiome
/ physiology
Permeability
Probiotics
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
04
07
2018
accepted:
02
01
2019
entrez:
16
1
2019
pubmed:
16
1
2019
medline:
2
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Gut fungi may influence the course of Clostridium difficile infection either positively or negatively for the host. Fungi are not prominent in the mouse gut, and C. albicans, the major human gastrointestinal commensal yeast, is in low abundance or absent in mice. Bifidobacterium is one of the probiotics that may attenuate the severity of C. difficile infection. Inflammatory synergy between C. albicans and C. difficile, in gut, may provide a state that more closely resembles human infection and be more suitable for testing probiotic effects. We performed fecal mycobiota analysis and administered C. albicans at 1 day prior to C. difficile dosing. Fecal eukaryotic 18S rDNA analysis demonstrated the presence of Ascomycota, specifically, Candida spp., after oral antibiotics, despite negative fecal fungal culture. C. albicans administration enhanced the severity of the C. difficile infection model as determined by mortality rate, weight loss, gut leakage (FITC-dextran assay), and serum and intestinal tissue cytokines. This occurred without increased fecal C. difficile or bacteremia, in comparison with C. difficile gavage alone. Candida lysate with C. difficile increased IL-8 production from HT-29 and Caco-2 human intestinal epithelial cell-lines. Bifidobacterium attenuated the disease severity of the C. difficile plus Candida model. The reduced severity was associated with decreased Candida burdens in feces. In conclusion, gut C. albicans worsened C. difficile infection, possibly through exacerbation of inflammation. Hence, a mouse model of Clostridium difficile infection with C. albicans present in the gut may better model the human patient condition. Gut fungal mycobiome investigation in patients with C. difficile is warranted and may suggest therapeutic targets.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30645630
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210798
pii: PONE-D-18-19870
pmc: PMC6333342
doi:
Substances chimiques
CXCL8 protein, human
0
Interleukin-8
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0210798Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: MF received salary from Cape Cod Inc. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Mucosal Immunol. 2010 Mar;3(2):148-58
pubmed: 19940845
Gut. 2006 Jul;55(7):954-60
pubmed: 16423887
Sci Rep. 2015 May 27;5:10416
pubmed: 26013555
Gut. 2006 Oct;55(10):1512-20
pubmed: 16966705
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 16;372(16):1539-48
pubmed: 25875259
Front Microbiol. 2016 Jan 12;6:1543
pubmed: 26793178
Nat Microbiol. 2016 Dec 12;2:16238
pubmed: 27941860
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005 Apr;18(2):247-63
pubmed: 15831824
Shock. 2018 Jan;49(1):62-70
pubmed: 28498297
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2016 Jan;40(1):117-32
pubmed: 26323480
Shock. 2004 Jan;21(1):17-25
pubmed: 14676679
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 May 15;60 Suppl 2:S66-71
pubmed: 25922403
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014 Mar;352(2):140-9
pubmed: 24372713
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011 Oct;24(4):682-700
pubmed: 21976604
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Dec;52(12):4189-201
pubmed: 25232157
Int J Infect Dis. 2009 Sep;13(5):e305-9
pubmed: 19398213
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 May;53(5):1655-61
pubmed: 25762773
Med Mycol. 2013 Nov;51(8):795-9
pubmed: 23855412
BMC Microbiol. 2014 Jul 02;14:177
pubmed: 24989059
J Nutr. 2005 Jan;135(1):109-15
pubmed: 15623841
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 27;12(7):e0181439
pubmed: 28750040
Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2005 Oct-Dec;25(4):205-30
pubmed: 16419618
Infect Immun. 2017 Dec 19;86(1):
pubmed: 29038123
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Nov;1143:45-60
pubmed: 19076344
Eukaryot Cell. 2013 Nov;12(11):1416-22
pubmed: 24036344
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Mar;38(3):602-3
pubmed: 8203861
Immunity. 2000 Feb;12(2):121-7
pubmed: 10714678
Gut Pathog. 2016 Nov 18;8:60
pubmed: 27891184
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016 Sep;363(18):
pubmed: 27573235
J Clin Invest. 2017 Jun 30;127(7):2829-2841
pubmed: 28530644
J Clin Invest. 1988 Nov;82(5):1516-24
pubmed: 3141478
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Dec;42(12):5710-4
pubmed: 15583303
BMC Microbiol. 2016 Oct 18;16(1):242
pubmed: 27756217
J Innate Immun. 2018;10(3):189-201
pubmed: 29393221
Mol Plant Pathol. 2007 Sep;8(5):539-48
pubmed: 20507520
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jan 27;330(4):257-62
pubmed: 8043060
J Transl Med. 2017 Apr 8;15(1):73
pubmed: 28388917
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011 Aug;14(4):386-91
pubmed: 21802979
J Endotoxin Res. 2007;13(3):140-9
pubmed: 17621556