Stress, health, noise exposures, and injuries among electronic waste recycling workers in Ghana.

Electronic waste recycling Health Noise exposure Occupational injuries Stress

Journal

Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)
ISSN: 1745-6673
Titre abrégé: J Occup Med Toxicol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245790

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 22 08 2018
accepted: 18 12 2018
entrez: 17 1 2019
pubmed: 17 1 2019
medline: 17 1 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Electronic waste (e-waste) recycling workers in low and middle-income countries have the potential for occupational injuries due to the nature of their work at informal e-waste sites. However, limited research exists on stress, noise, occupational injuries, and health risks associated with this work environment. This study evaluated injury experience, noise exposures, and stress risk factors among e-waste workers at the large recycling site in the Agbogbloshie market, Accra, Ghana. Participants completed a survey addressing their work, health status, stress, exposures to several occupational hazards (including noise), use of personal protective equipment at work, and injury experience. A subset of participants also completed personal noise dosimetry measurements. Poisson regression was used to evaluate the association between the number of injuries experienced by participants and various factors evaluated in the survey. Forty-six male e-waste workers completed the survey, and 26 completed a noise dosimetry measurement. Participants experienced an average of 9.9 ± 9.6 injuries per person in the previous 6 months (range: 1-40). The majority of injuries were lacerations (65.2%), and the most common injury location was the hand (45.7%). Use of personal protective equipment was rare. The mean time-weighted average noise level was 78.8 ± 5.9 dBA. Higher perceived stress, greater age, poorer health status, not using gloves, and involvement in dismantling activities were associated with an increased number of injuries. After controlling for each of these risk factors, perceived stress level and perceived noise exposure were associated with a significantly greater number of injuries. Our study identified a large number of injuries among informal e-waste recyclers, and we found that higher levels of perceived stress and perceived noise were associated with an increased number of occupational injuries, even after controlling for other injury risk factors.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Electronic waste (e-waste) recycling workers in low and middle-income countries have the potential for occupational injuries due to the nature of their work at informal e-waste sites. However, limited research exists on stress, noise, occupational injuries, and health risks associated with this work environment. This study evaluated injury experience, noise exposures, and stress risk factors among e-waste workers at the large recycling site in the Agbogbloshie market, Accra, Ghana.
METHODS METHODS
Participants completed a survey addressing their work, health status, stress, exposures to several occupational hazards (including noise), use of personal protective equipment at work, and injury experience. A subset of participants also completed personal noise dosimetry measurements. Poisson regression was used to evaluate the association between the number of injuries experienced by participants and various factors evaluated in the survey.
RESULTS RESULTS
Forty-six male e-waste workers completed the survey, and 26 completed a noise dosimetry measurement. Participants experienced an average of 9.9 ± 9.6 injuries per person in the previous 6 months (range: 1-40). The majority of injuries were lacerations (65.2%), and the most common injury location was the hand (45.7%). Use of personal protective equipment was rare. The mean time-weighted average noise level was 78.8 ± 5.9 dBA. Higher perceived stress, greater age, poorer health status, not using gloves, and involvement in dismantling activities were associated with an increased number of injuries. After controlling for each of these risk factors, perceived stress level and perceived noise exposure were associated with a significantly greater number of injuries.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our study identified a large number of injuries among informal e-waste recyclers, and we found that higher levels of perceived stress and perceived noise were associated with an increased number of occupational injuries, even after controlling for other injury risk factors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30647766
doi: 10.1186/s12995-018-0222-9
pii: 222
pmc: PMC6327403
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1

Subventions

Organisme : NIOSH CDC HHS
ID : T42 OH008455
Pays : United States

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

All research procedures were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board (HUM00084062) and the University of Ghana Institutional Review Board at the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR-IRB CPN 070/13-14). All participants provided written informed consent prior to participation.Not applicable.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Références

Int J Audiol. 2015 Feb;54 Suppl 1:S30-6
pubmed: 25549168
Workplace Health Saf. 2017 May;65(5):219-226
pubmed: 27729501
Ann Occup Hyg. 2016 May;60(4):405-20
pubmed: 26712895
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jan 19;13(1):
pubmed: 26797626
Waste Manag. 2012 Nov;32(11):2134-46
pubmed: 22560019
Int J Environ Health Res. 2012;22(6):500-17
pubmed: 22428915
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(7):482-8
pubmed: 25738822
New Solut. 2016 Aug;26(2):190-207
pubmed: 27261445
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015 Jan;41(1):75-83
pubmed: 25137556
Waste Manag. 2013 May;33(5):1237-50
pubmed: 23402807
J Res Health Sci. 2012 Dec 13;12(2):101-4
pubmed: 23241520
Occup Environ Med. 2012 Mar;69(3):211-6
pubmed: 21725068
Public Health. 2012 May;126(5):441-7
pubmed: 22480714
Sci Total Environ. 2009 Dec 20;408(2):183-91
pubmed: 19846207
Am J Ind Med. 2006 Apr;49(4):249-60
pubmed: 16550563
Am J Ind Med. 2006 Nov;49(11):943-52
pubmed: 17036350
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Jul 22;15(1):116
pubmed: 27449349
J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96
pubmed: 6668417
Glob Health Promot. 2017 Dec;24(4):90-98
pubmed: 27271535
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Oct 1;463-464:1147-53
pubmed: 22858354
New Solut. 2016 Nov;26(3):389-411
pubmed: 27605565
Inj Prev. 2018 Jun;24(3):185-192
pubmed: 28679520
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 13;14(8):
pubmed: 28805712
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jan 29;14(2):
pubmed: 28146075
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2013 Oct-Dec;19(4):278-86
pubmed: 24588034
Workplace Health Saf. 2015 Aug;63(8):350-61
pubmed: 26240118
J Environ Manage. 2009 Aug;90(11):3322-31
pubmed: 19500898
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2016 Mar 29;8(1):e1-7
pubmed: 27247151
Am J Public Health. 2005 Jul;95(7):1213-9
pubmed: 15983273
J Occup Environ Med. 2010 Sep;52(9):934-42
pubmed: 20798640
Am J Ind Med. 2014 May;57(5):539-56
pubmed: 23532780
J Environ Health. ;79(3):8-16
pubmed: 29120130
Environ Health Perspect. 2016 May;124(5):550-5
pubmed: 26418733
BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 16;15:1065
pubmed: 26474859
Waste Manag. 2009 Dec;29(12):3014-21
pubmed: 19620000
Mil Med. 2014 Nov;179(11):1311-8
pubmed: 25373060
BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 05;13:303
pubmed: 23560685
Public Underst Sci. 2015 Jan;24(1):23-37
pubmed: 25193967

Auteurs

Katrina N Burns (KN)

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights 6611 SPH I, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.

Stephanie K Sayler (SK)

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights 6611 SPH I, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.

Richard L Neitzel (RL)

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights 6611 SPH I, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.

Classifications MeSH