Effect of complexed trace minerals on cumulus-oocyte complex recovery and in vitro embryo production in beef cattle1,2.
Animals
Cattle
/ physiology
Cobalt
/ pharmacology
Copper
/ pharmacology
Dietary Supplements
Embryo Transfer
/ veterinary
Embryo, Mammalian
/ drug effects
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
/ veterinary
Insemination, Artificial
/ veterinary
Lactation
Manganese
/ pharmacology
Minerals
/ pharmacology
Oocyte Retrieval
/ veterinary
Parity
Postpartum Period
/ drug effects
Pregnancy
Random Allocation
Reproduction
/ drug effects
Trace Elements
/ pharmacology
Zinc
/ pharmacology
beef cattle
complexed
embryo transfer
in vitro fertilization
reproduction
trace mineral
Journal
Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Apr 2019
03 Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
26
11
2018
accepted:
10
01
2019
pubmed:
17
1
2019
medline:
25
6
2019
entrez:
17
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the impact of complexed trace mineral supplementation on ovum pick-up (OPU) and in vitro embryo production in lactating beef cows. Thirty days prior to fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI; day -30), 68 postpartum cows were stratified by BW, BCS, and parity before being randomly assigned to 10 pens of either a treatment (TRT; n = 5) or a control (CNT; n = 5) group. Each group received a weekly mineral supplement allotment of 1.16 kg × week-1 × cow-calf pair-1 for 14 wk. Cows assigned to the TRT group received a mineral supplement that contained amino acid complexes of zinc, copper, and manganese, as well as cobalt glucoheptonate (Availa Plus; Zinpro Corp., Eden Prairie, MN, USA), while cows assigned to the CNT group received a mineral supplement that was formulated to contain similar concentrations of these trace minerals from inorganic sources. All cows were submitted to a 7 d CO-Synch + CIDR protocol on day -10 and bred using FTAI on day 0. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed on day 28 and nonpregnant cows were removed. All pregnant cows were subjected to ovum pick-up (OPU) on day 52 and 67 of gestation. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were evaluated and graded prior to in vitro fertilization (IVF). Analysis of variance was conducted to determine effects of treatment on response variables, and pen was considered the experimental unit. Supplement consumption did not differ (P = 0.48) between treatments (1.16 ± 0.12 vs. 1.07 ± 0.15 kg of DM × week-1 × cow-calf pair-1 for TRT and CNT, respectively). Total COC recovery was greater (P = 0.03) from TRT when compared with CNT cows (22.4 ± 2.0 vs. 16.4 ± 1.4 COCs × pen-1, respectively) and the number of COCs meeting maturation criteria was increased in TRT cows (P = 0.05) when compared with CNT cows (15.9 ± 1.6 vs. 11.8 ± 1.0 COCs × pen-1, respectively). Production of transferable embryos tended to be greater (P = 0.06) for TRT than CNT cows (4.7 ± 0.6 vs. 2.7 ± 0.7 embryos × pen-1, respectively). Furthermore, when expressed as a ratio, the number of recovered COCs meeting maturation criteria that were required to produce a transferable embryo tended to be lower for TRT than CNT cows (3.10 ± 0.93 vs. 7.02 ± 1.60; P = 0.06). In summary, complete replacement with complexed trace mineral improved COC recovery and in vitro embryo production when compared with inorganic forms of these trace minerals in beef cows.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30649409
pii: 5288790
doi: 10.1093/jas/skz005
pmc: PMC6447244
doi:
Substances chimiques
Minerals
0
Trace Elements
0
Cobalt
3G0H8C9362
Manganese
42Z2K6ZL8P
Copper
789U1901C5
Zinc
J41CSQ7QDS
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1478-1490Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.
Références
J Anim Sci. 1999 Mar;77(3):522-32
pubmed: 10229347
J Dairy Sci. 1999 May;82(5):1019-25
pubmed: 10342241
J Anim Sci. 1999 Aug;77(8):2172-9
pubmed: 10461996
Br J Nutr. 2000 Nov;84(5):645-53
pubmed: 11177177
Nature. 1975 Apr 3;254(5499):427-9
pubmed: 1118025
Hum Reprod Update. 2001 Mar-Apr;7(2):175-89
pubmed: 11284661
Anim Reprod Sci. 2001 Jul 3;67(1-2):37-43
pubmed: 11408112
J Anim Sci. 2001 Jul;79(7):1650-9
pubmed: 11465350
Vet J. 2003 Sep;166(2):125-39
pubmed: 12902178
J Anim Sci. 2004 Aug;82(8):2375-83
pubmed: 15318737
Theriogenology. 2005 Sep 15;64(5):1090-103
pubmed: 16125553
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Jul;89(7):2679-93
pubmed: 16772587
J Reprod Dev. 2007 Aug;53(4):777-84
pubmed: 17420621
Anim Reprod Sci. 2008 Jul;106(3-4):221-31
pubmed: 17513073
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2007;19(4):553-62
pubmed: 17524300
Reprod Domest Anim. 2008 Oct;43(5):623-32
pubmed: 18384498
Reprod Domest Anim. 2008 Oct;43(5):612-22
pubmed: 18384499
Fertil Steril. 2010 Nov;94(6):2465-6
pubmed: 20226443
Anim Reprod Sci. 2010 Jun;119(3-4):212-8
pubmed: 20226605
Theriogenology. 2010 Oct 15;74(7):1141-8
pubmed: 20688367
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Sep;93(9):4239-51
pubmed: 20723697
J Anim Sci. 2010 Dec;88(12):3856-70
pubmed: 20817861
Cell Biol Int. 2011 Jun;35(6):593-7
pubmed: 21087207
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Jun;22(6):647-52
pubmed: 21514228
Theriogenology. 2012 Jan 15;77(2):373-81
pubmed: 21958636
Reproduction. 2011 Dec;142(6):831-43
pubmed: 21994359
Dev Biol. 2013 Apr 1;376(1):51-61
pubmed: 23348678
Cell Biol Int. 2014 Feb;38(2):246-53
pubmed: 24154966
Theriogenology. 2014 Oct 1;82(6):866-74
pubmed: 25091527
Reprod Domest Anim. 2014 Oct;49(5):865-74
pubmed: 25131826
J Anim Sci. 2016 Mar;94(3):1215-26
pubmed: 27065282
Gamete Res. 1989 Oct;24(2):197-204
pubmed: 2793058
Cryobiology. 2017 Feb;74:31-35
pubmed: 28063961
Reprod Domest Anim. 2018 Jun;53(3):644-654
pubmed: 29450923
Teratology. 1985 Dec;32(3):397-405
pubmed: 4082071
J Anim Sci. 1995 Apr;73(4):1202-7
pubmed: 7628965
Pediatr Res. 1994 Apr;35(4 Pt 1):404-8
pubmed: 8047376
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1993 Mar-Apr;71(3-4):205-10
pubmed: 8104673
Pediatr Res. 1994 Feb;35(2):188-96
pubmed: 8165054
J Am Coll Nutr. 1996 Feb;15(1):14-20
pubmed: 8632110
Aust Vet J. 1997 Sep;75(9):660-2
pubmed: 9325545