Initial experience with cinematic rendering for the visualization of extracardiac anatomy in complex congenital heart defects†.
Aorta, Thoracic
/ diagnostic imaging
Computed Tomography Angiography
Echocardiography
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Defects, Congenital
/ diagnosis
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
/ methods
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Multidetector Computed Tomography
/ methods
Preoperative Period
Pulmonary Artery
/ diagnostic imaging
Pulmonary Veins
/ diagnostic imaging
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Cinematic rendering
Computed tomography
Congenital heart disease
Three-dimensional
Journal
Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
ISSN: 1569-9285
Titre abrégé: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101158399
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2019
01 06 2019
Historique:
received:
23
08
2018
revised:
26
11
2018
accepted:
02
12
2018
pubmed:
17
1
2019
medline:
4
12
2019
entrez:
17
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Detailed anatomical information is essential for planning of surgical therapy in patients with congenital heart disease. We wanted to determine whether cinematic rendering, the novel 3-dimensional visualization technique, could help paediatric cardiac surgeons achieve better preoperative visualization of the extracardiac anatomy in patients with complex congenital heart defects. Therefore, cinematic rendering was compared to the traditional volume rendering technique by means of a questionnaire with predefined criteria. Picture sets from 20 infant patients (mean age = 17 days) were generated from computed tomography data with both the cinematic rendering and the volume rendering techniques. These were presented side by side in a digital high-resolution portfolio without labelling them. Three experienced paediatric cardiac surgeons were provided with these portfolios and a questionnaire. They were asked to evaluate the images individually in predefined categories on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 = 'fully acceptable' to 4 = 'unacceptable'. Cinematic rendering scored significantly better values on the Likert scale in 7 of 9 categories, namely 'spatial impression in general', 'depth perception', 'delineation of the atrial appendages/pulmonary veins/peripheral pulmonary arteries', 'assessability of the anterior interventricular sulcus' and 'assessability of the aortic arch branches'. Cinematic rendering is a valuable software tool, and our data suggest that it provides significantly better visualization than volume rendering. The surgeons appraised improved depth perception and delineation of structures adjacent to the heart as the most significant advantages.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30649430
pii: 5289777
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy348
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
916-921Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.