[What influence do increased physical performance, age, sex and training frequency have on the effectiveness of back training?]
Welche Bedeutung haben physische Leistungssteigerungen, Alter, Geschlecht und Trainingsumfang für die Wirksamkeit eines Rückentrainings?
Back pain
Health services research
Muscle strength
Physical fitness
Resistance training
Journal
Schmerz (Berlin, Germany)
ISSN: 1432-2129
Titre abrégé: Schmerz
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8906258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
17
1
2019
medline:
14
8
2019
entrez:
17
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Active exercising can effectively reduce low back pain but the mechanisms of action are still unclear. What are the influences of training frequency, increased physical performance, age and gender on the effectiveness of a multimodal back training? A total of 1395 persons with back pain (mean age 46.9 ± 12.3 years, 65% female) took part in a multimodal back training over 24 months in the context of a multicenter study (39 locations). Back pain, physical capacity of strength, mobility and bilateral strength ratio of the spine stabilizing muscles were measured at the beginning of the training and after 6, 12 and 18 months. The participants trained on average for 41.0 (SD ± 17.8) 60-min training units. This resulted in an increase of strength (28.1%), mobility (14.7%) and strength ratio (6.5%) compared to an age and gender-matched cohort without back pain. Back pain was reduced by 37.5%. The reduction in back pain can be ascribed to the training frequency by 70% and to increased physical performance by 30%. Age only marginally influenced the effect of training, while gender had no significant effect. Increases in physical performance have positive effects on the reduction of back pain but the number of training sessions was shown to be more relevant in the reduction of low back pain.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Active exercising can effectively reduce low back pain but the mechanisms of action are still unclear.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
What are the influences of training frequency, increased physical performance, age and gender on the effectiveness of a multimodal back training?
MATERIAL AND METHODS
METHODS
A total of 1395 persons with back pain (mean age 46.9 ± 12.3 years, 65% female) took part in a multimodal back training over 24 months in the context of a multicenter study (39 locations). Back pain, physical capacity of strength, mobility and bilateral strength ratio of the spine stabilizing muscles were measured at the beginning of the training and after 6, 12 and 18 months.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The participants trained on average for 41.0 (SD ± 17.8) 60-min training units. This resulted in an increase of strength (28.1%), mobility (14.7%) and strength ratio (6.5%) compared to an age and gender-matched cohort without back pain. Back pain was reduced by 37.5%. The reduction in back pain can be ascribed to the training frequency by 70% and to increased physical performance by 30%. Age only marginally influenced the effect of training, while gender had no significant effect.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Increases in physical performance have positive effects on the reduction of back pain but the number of training sessions was shown to be more relevant in the reduction of low back pain.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30649627
doi: 10.1007/s00482-018-0353-z
pii: 10.1007/s00482-018-0353-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
ger
Pagination
139-146Références
Lancet. 1999 Aug 14;354(9178):581-5
pubmed: 10470716
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Apr 1;26(7):778-87
pubmed: 11295900
Schmerz. 2001 Dec;15(6):468-73
pubmed: 11793153
Pain. 1992 Aug;50(2):133-49
pubmed: 1408309
Ann Intern Med. 2005 May 3;142(9):776-85
pubmed: 15867410
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005 Aug;19(4):541-55
pubmed: 15949775
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD000335
pubmed: 16034851
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2008 Nov;14(4):255-63
pubmed: 18940712
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2008 Jan;12(1):22-30
pubmed: 19083652
Pain. 2010 Apr;149(1):50-6
pubmed: 20185238
Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):482-91
pubmed: 21982256
Eur Spine J. 2012 Apr;21(4):575-98
pubmed: 22072093
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jun;64(6):2028-37
pubmed: 22231424
J Rehabil Med. 2014 Mar;46(3):241-9
pubmed: 24473577
Clin Rehabil. 2015 Dec;29(12):1155-67
pubmed: 25681408
Lancet. 2015 Aug 22;386(9995):743-800
pubmed: 26063472
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Feb;176(2):199-208
pubmed: 26752509
Schmerz. 2016 Oct;30(5):429-436
pubmed: 27492492
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 24;4:CD011279
pubmed: 28436583
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 7;12(7):e0180788
pubmed: 28686644
J Rehabil Med. 2018 Dec 25;51(1):61-70
pubmed: 30406268
J Spinal Disord. 1996 Aug;9(4):306-12
pubmed: 8877957