Clinical and CT findings of small bowel obstruction caused by rice cakes in comparison with bezoars.
Bezoar
Food-induced small bowel obstruction
Multi-detector CT
Rice cake
Small bowel obstruction
Journal
Japanese journal of radiology
ISSN: 1867-108X
Titre abrégé: Jpn J Radiol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101490689
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
21
08
2018
accepted:
10
01
2019
pubmed:
17
1
2019
medline:
6
6
2019
entrez:
17
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Rice cakes have not been recognized as a cause of small bowel obstruction (SBO) worldwide. We compared clinical and CT findings of rice cake SBO versus SBO due to bezoars, the most common cause of food-induced SBO. Twenty-four patients with rice cake SBO (n = 17) or bezoar SBO (n = 7) were retrospectively evaluated for clinical findings and the following multi-detector CT (MDCT) features: identification of the transition zone, presence of intraluminal lesions, degree of obstruction, and length and attenuation of obstructing materials. Categorical variables were compared by Fisher's exact test, and continuous variables by independent t test. None of the rice cake SBO patients required surgery, whereas 4/7 (57%) bezoar SBO patients underwent surgery. On MDCT, rice cake residues were recognized as well-defined intraluminal lesions of shorter length (29.8 ± 4.6 mm vs. 47.7 ± 10.8 mm for bezoars; p < 0.0001) and higher attenuation (106 ± 27.8 HU vs. - 62.8 ± 14.7 HU for bezoars; p < 0.0001). Rice cake SBO patients did not require surgery. On MDCT, rice cake residues were significantly shorter and higher in attenuation than bezoars. These findings facilitate diagnosis and support the conservative management of rice cake SBO.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30649674
doi: 10.1007/s11604-019-00811-9
pii: 10.1007/s11604-019-00811-9
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
301-307Références
Am J Surg. 2000 Jul;180(1):33-6
pubmed: 11036136
Clin Imaging. 2001 Jan-Feb;25(1):44-6
pubmed: 11435039
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002 Jan-Feb;26(1):132-3
pubmed: 11801917
Eur Radiol. 2002 Nov;12(11):2659-61
pubmed: 12386754
Eur Radiol. 2003 Feb;13(2):299-304
pubmed: 12598994
Emerg Radiol. 2004 Feb;10(4):197-200
pubmed: 15290490
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Nov;183(5):1361-6
pubmed: 15505304
World J Emerg Surg. 2007 Aug 15;2:20
pubmed: 17697369
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2008 Jun-Jul;32(6-7):596-600
pubmed: 18487032
Radiographics. 2009 Mar-Apr;29(2):423-39
pubmed: 19325057
Intern Med. 2011;50(22):2737-9
pubmed: 22082884
Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep;6(3):596-603
pubmed: 23271989
Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2013 Oct;110(10):1804-13
pubmed: 24097152
Intern Med. 2014;53(11):1099-105
pubmed: 24881731
Eur Radiol. 2015 Apr;25(4):922-31
pubmed: 25417124
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 7;21(33):9774-84
pubmed: 26361425
Intern Med. 2016;55(12):1565-8
pubmed: 27301506
Intern Med. 2016;55(14):1933-4
pubmed: 27432107
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
Abdom Imaging. 1997 May-Jun;22(3):315-7
pubmed: 9107659
Abdom Imaging. 1997 Sep-Oct;22(5):471-3
pubmed: 9233879