Preclinical toxicity and pharmacokinetics of a new orally bioavailable flubendazole formulation and the impact for clinical trials and risk/benefit to patients.
Journal
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
ISSN: 1935-2735
Titre abrégé: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101291488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
21
06
2018
accepted:
26
11
2018
entrez:
17
1
2019
pubmed:
17
1
2019
medline:
12
2
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Flubendazole, originally developed to treat infections with intestinal nematodes, has been shown to be efficacious in animal models of filarial infections. For treatment of filarial nematodes, systemic exposure is needed. For this purpose, an orally bioavailable amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) formulation of flubendazole was developed. As this formulation results in improved systemic absorption, the pharmacokinetic and toxicological profile of the flubendazole ASD formulation have been assessed to ensure human safety before clinical trials could be initiated. Safety pharmacology, toxicity and genotoxicity studies have been conducted with the flubendazole ASD formulation. In animals, flubendazole has good oral bioavailability from an ASD formulation ranging from 15% in dogs, 27% in rats to more than 100% in jirds. In in vivo toxicity studies with the ASD formulation, high systemic exposure to flubendazole and its main metabolites was reached. Flubendazole, up to high peak plasma concentrations, does not induce Cmax related effects in CNS or cardiovascular system. In repeated dose toxicity studies in rats and dogs, flubendazole-induced changes were observed in haematological, lymphoid and gastrointestinal systems and in testes. In dogs, the liver was an additional target organ. Upon treatment cessation, at least partial recovery was observed for these changes in dogs. In rats, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was 5 mg (as base)/kg body weight/day (mg eq./kg/day) in males and 2.5 mg eq./kg/day in females. In dogs, the NOAEL was lower than 20 mg eq./kg/day. Regarding genotoxicity, flubendazole was negative in the Ames test, but positive in the in vivo micronucleus test. Based on these results, in combination with previously described genotoxicity and reproductive toxicity data and the outcome of the preclinical efficacy studies, it was concluded that no flubendazole treatment regimen can be selected that would provide efficacy in humans at safe exposure.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Flubendazole, originally developed to treat infections with intestinal nematodes, has been shown to be efficacious in animal models of filarial infections. For treatment of filarial nematodes, systemic exposure is needed. For this purpose, an orally bioavailable amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) formulation of flubendazole was developed. As this formulation results in improved systemic absorption, the pharmacokinetic and toxicological profile of the flubendazole ASD formulation have been assessed to ensure human safety before clinical trials could be initiated.
METHODS & FINDINGS
Safety pharmacology, toxicity and genotoxicity studies have been conducted with the flubendazole ASD formulation. In animals, flubendazole has good oral bioavailability from an ASD formulation ranging from 15% in dogs, 27% in rats to more than 100% in jirds. In in vivo toxicity studies with the ASD formulation, high systemic exposure to flubendazole and its main metabolites was reached. Flubendazole, up to high peak plasma concentrations, does not induce Cmax related effects in CNS or cardiovascular system. In repeated dose toxicity studies in rats and dogs, flubendazole-induced changes were observed in haematological, lymphoid and gastrointestinal systems and in testes. In dogs, the liver was an additional target organ. Upon treatment cessation, at least partial recovery was observed for these changes in dogs. In rats, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was 5 mg (as base)/kg body weight/day (mg eq./kg/day) in males and 2.5 mg eq./kg/day in females. In dogs, the NOAEL was lower than 20 mg eq./kg/day. Regarding genotoxicity, flubendazole was negative in the Ames test, but positive in the in vivo micronucleus test.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on these results, in combination with previously described genotoxicity and reproductive toxicity data and the outcome of the preclinical efficacy studies, it was concluded that no flubendazole treatment regimen can be selected that would provide efficacy in humans at safe exposure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30650076
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007026
pii: PNTD-D-18-00596
pmc: PMC6334931
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antinematodal Agents
0
Mebendazole
81G6I5V05I
flubendazole
R8M46911LR
Banques de données
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.5vv774m']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0007026Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: ownership of stocks or shares of Johnson & Johnson. All authors are employees of Johnson & Johnson.
Références
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Jan 16;13(1):e0007026
pubmed: 30650076
Lancet. 1983 Jan 22;1(8317):139-43
pubmed: 6130195
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 May 29;8(5):e2838
pubmed: 24874646
Fed Regist. 2005 Oct 20;70(202):61133-4
pubmed: 16237859
Psychopharmacologia. 1968 Sep 20;13(3):222-57
pubmed: 5679627
Toxicol Pathol. 2004 Jan-Feb;32(1):1-8
pubmed: 14713541
Int J Toxicol. 2015 Mar-Apr;34(2):129-37
pubmed: 25701764
Asian J Androl. 2014 Jan-Feb;16(1):81-8
pubmed: 24369136
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Jan 16;13(1):e0006320
pubmed: 30650105
Mutat Res. 1976 Feb;38(1):3-32
pubmed: 768757
Fed Regist. 2001 Jul 13;66(135):36791-2
pubmed: 12356097
Mutat Res. 1975 Dec;31(6):347-64
pubmed: 768755
Mutagenesis. 2016 May;31(3):309-21
pubmed: 26443851
Reprod Toxicol. 2014 Nov;49:33-42
pubmed: 24994687
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011 May;9(5):497-501
pubmed: 21609260
Acta Trop. 2003 May;86(2-3):141-59
pubmed: 12745134
Mutat Res. 1983 May;113(3-4):173-215
pubmed: 6341825
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010 Jun;48(5):407-14
pubmed: 20586571
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001 Mar 1;218(5):669-96
pubmed: 11280396