Addressing the Horizontal Gender Division of Labor: A Case Study of Support and Obstacles in a Heavy Industry Plant in Iceland.

Gender equality Gender segregation Professional role Stereotyped behavior Workplace intervention Workplace policy

Journal

Sex roles
ISSN: 0360-0025
Titre abrégé: Sex Roles
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7511805

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
entrez: 18 1 2019
pubmed: 18 1 2019
medline: 18 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In the present article, we analyze a project in a heavy industry plant in Iceland in which the management aims to hire an equal number of women and men and, thereby, to work against the gender segregation of work. For their efforts, called the 50/50 strategy, the plant has received national and international awards. Observations and semi-structured interviews were conducted during five visits to the plant, including 85 interviews with 72 individuals, 49 women and 23 men. We found extensive support for the policy. The managers saw business opportunities in it, but although the employees supported the policy because it was seen as fair and modern, they doubted that achieving equal gender representation would be possible. The main emphasis so far has been on designing work organization and equipment, advertising the policy, presenting job opportunities to women outside the plant, and encouraging both genders to acquire the "right" education. Why the 50/50 target has not been reached lies partly in gender stereotypes outside the plant. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the next steps should be to challenge an alleged male working-culture within the plant. If they fail to do so, their efforts to eliminate horizontal gender segregation are unlikely to succeed and may even become counterproductive.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30651664
doi: 10.1007/s11199-018-0915-7
pii: 915
pmc: PMC6318251
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

91-104

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Compliance with Ethical StandardsOur research project was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board at the second author’s home institution and was approved for the protection of human subjects. Each interviewee was informed about the objectives and risks of the research, was assured that their confidentiality would be protected, and gave their informed consent.

Références

J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jan;92(1):81-92
pubmed: 17227153
Br J Sociol. 2007 Mar;58(1):123-32; discussion 133-4
pubmed: 17343641
AJS. 2008 May;113(6):1479-526
pubmed: 19044141

Auteurs

Gudbjörg Linda Rafnsdóttir (GL)

1Department of Sociology, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland.

Jill Weigt (J)

2Department of Sociology, California State University, San Marcos, USA.

Classifications MeSH