Pre-administration of remifentanil in target-controlled propofol and remifentanil anesthesia prolongs anesthesia induction in neurosurgical patients: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.


Journal

Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Historique:
entrez: 18 1 2019
pubmed: 18 1 2019
medline: 29 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pre- and co-administration of remifentanil in target-controlled propofol and remifentanil anesthesia are the most common methods in clinical practice. However, anesthesia induction time by timing remifentanil administration was not identified. Therefore, we investigated the induction time of anesthesia based on type of remifentanil administration in target-controlled anesthesia. A total of 60 patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: Pre-administered with remifentanil before propofol infusion (Group R, n = 30) and co-administered with remifentanil with propofol (Group N, n = 30). The primary outcome was total induction time based on the order of remifentanil administration. Secondary outcomes were from start of the propofol infusion time to loss of consciousness (LOC), rocuronium onset time, time to Bispectral index (BIS) 60, and hemodynamic variables. The mean ± SD of total induction time was 180.5 ± 49.0 s in Group N and 246.3 ± 64.7 s in Group R (mean difference: 65.8 seconds; 95% CI: 35.0-96.5 s, P < .01). Time to BIS 60 and rocuronium onset time were longer in the Group R (P < .01 and P < .01, respectively). The Δheart rate and Δcardiac output values were lower in the Group R (P = .02 and P = .04, respectively). Injection pain was reported by 11 of 28 (39%) in the Group N and in 2 of 28 (7%) in the Group R (difference in proportion: 32%, 95% CI: 10-51%, P = .01). Pre-administration of remifentanil in target-controlled propofol and remifentanil anesthesia prolongs total induction time about 35% compared to co-administration of remifentanil and propofol by decreased CO.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pre- and co-administration of remifentanil in target-controlled propofol and remifentanil anesthesia are the most common methods in clinical practice. However, anesthesia induction time by timing remifentanil administration was not identified. Therefore, we investigated the induction time of anesthesia based on type of remifentanil administration in target-controlled anesthesia.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 60 patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: Pre-administered with remifentanil before propofol infusion (Group R, n = 30) and co-administered with remifentanil with propofol (Group N, n = 30). The primary outcome was total induction time based on the order of remifentanil administration. Secondary outcomes were from start of the propofol infusion time to loss of consciousness (LOC), rocuronium onset time, time to Bispectral index (BIS) 60, and hemodynamic variables.
RESULTS RESULTS
The mean ± SD of total induction time was 180.5 ± 49.0 s in Group N and 246.3 ± 64.7 s in Group R (mean difference: 65.8 seconds; 95% CI: 35.0-96.5 s, P < .01). Time to BIS 60 and rocuronium onset time were longer in the Group R (P < .01 and P < .01, respectively). The Δheart rate and Δcardiac output values were lower in the Group R (P = .02 and P = .04, respectively). Injection pain was reported by 11 of 28 (39%) in the Group N and in 2 of 28 (7%) in the Group R (difference in proportion: 32%, 95% CI: 10-51%, P = .01).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Pre-administration of remifentanil in target-controlled propofol and remifentanil anesthesia prolongs total induction time about 35% compared to co-administration of remifentanil and propofol by decreased CO.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30653147
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014144
pii: 00005792-201901180-00062
pmc: PMC6370149
doi:

Substances chimiques

Analgesics, Opioid 0
Anesthetics, Intravenous 0
Remifentanil P10582JYYK
Propofol YI7VU623SF

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e14144

Références

Anesth Analg. 2011 May;112(5):1169-73
pubmed: 21346159
Anesth Analg. 2000 Jul;91(1):58-61
pubmed: 10866887
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jul;99(1):68-74
pubmed: 17573395
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(35):e4769
pubmed: 27583931
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2012 Jan;24(1):51-7
pubmed: 22015431
Anaesthesia. 2009 Jul;64(7):719-26
pubmed: 19624626
Anesth Analg. 1996 Aug;83(2):279-85
pubmed: 8694306
Mol Biol Rep. 2013 Dec;40(12):6997-7006
pubmed: 24190484
J Clin Anesth. 2002 Nov;14(7):494-9
pubmed: 12477583
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Oct;24(10):832-9
pubmed: 17666154
Anesth Analg. 2010 Nov;111(5):1180-92
pubmed: 20736431
Neurology. 1966 Nov;16(11):1053-63
pubmed: 5950916
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016 Apr;20(8):1479-89
pubmed: 27160118
Anesthesiology. 2001 Jan;94(1):47-55
pubmed: 11135721
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Feb;106(2):208-14
pubmed: 21118844
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Jun;26(3):325-31
pubmed: 23333814
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Dec;33(12):922-928
pubmed: 27606612
J Anesth. 2013 Oct;27(5):771-4
pubmed: 23483299
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;30(2):213-6
pubmed: 24803760
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29(3):656-62
pubmed: 25440654
Anesthesiology. 1999 Apr;90(4):1070-7
pubmed: 10201679
Genet Mol Res. 2014 Sep 26;13(3):7658-65
pubmed: 25299079
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Aug;65(2):121-6
pubmed: 24023993
Perioper Med (Lond). 2014 Oct 30;3:9
pubmed: 25632346
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Dec;99(6):876-80
pubmed: 18006530
Br J Anaesth. 2001 Apr;86(4):523-7
pubmed: 11573626
Anesth Analg. 1999 Sep;89(3):545-52
pubmed: 10475279
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Mar;108(3):483-9
pubmed: 19959767
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005 Nov;22(11):890-2
pubmed: 16225729
Chest. 2017 Jun;151(6):1329-1337
pubmed: 28108178
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 May;56(5):558-64
pubmed: 22313514
Br J Anaesth. 1991 Jul;67(1):41-8
pubmed: 1859758
Anesthesiology. 1997 Jan;86(1):10-23
pubmed: 9009935
Br J Anaesth. 1996 Nov;77(5):607-11
pubmed: 8957976
Anaesthesia. 2010 Jul;65(7):697-703
pubmed: 20477784
Anesth Analg. 2001 Mar;92(3):656-61
pubmed: 11226096
Anesth Analg. 2003 Jun;96(6):1645-1650
pubmed: 12760989
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Apr;48(4):396-9
pubmed: 15025597
Anesthesiology. 2004 Jun;100(6):1373-81
pubmed: 15166554

Auteurs

Jin Hee Ahn (JH)

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Doyeon Kim (D)

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine.

Ik Soo Chung (IS)

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine.

Jeong Jin Lee (JJ)

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine.

Eun Kyung Lee (EK)

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine.

Ji Seon Jeong (JS)

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH