Clinical utility of existing and second-generation interferon-γ release assays for diagnostic evaluation of tuberculosis: an observational cohort study.


Journal

The Lancet. Infectious diseases
ISSN: 1474-4457
Titre abrégé: Lancet Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101130150

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
received: 15 06 2018
revised: 20 09 2018
accepted: 03 10 2018
pubmed: 19 1 2019
medline: 28 5 2020
entrez: 19 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The clinical utility of interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) for diagnosis of active tuberculosis is unclear, although they are commonly used in countries with a low incidence of tuberculosis. We aimed to resolve this clinical uncertainty by determining the accuracy and utility of commercially available and second-generation IGRAs in the diagnostic assessment of suspected tuberculosis in a low-incidence setting. We did a prospective cohort study of adults with suspected tuberculosis in routine secondary care in England. Patients were tested for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection at baseline with commercially available (T-SPOT.TB and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube [QFT-GIT]) and second-generation (incorporating novel M tuberculosis antigens) IGRAs and followed up for 6-12 months to establish definitive diagnoses. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and predictive values of the tests were determined. Of the 1060 adults enrolled in the study, 845 were included in the analyses and 363 were diagnosed with tuberculosis. Sensitivity of T-SPOT.TB for all tuberculosis diagnosis, including culture-confirmed and highly probable cases, was 81·4% (95% CI 76·6-85·3), which was higher than QFT-GIT (67·3% [62·0-72·1]). Second-generation IGRAs had a sensitivity of 94·0% (90·0-96·4) for culture-confirmed tuberculosis and 89·2% (85·2-92·2) when including highly probable tuberculosis, giving a negative likelihood ratio for all tuberculosis cases of 0·13 (95% CI 0·10-0·19). Specificity ranged from 86·2% (95% CI 82·3-89·4) for T-SPOT.TB to 80·0% (75·6-83·8) for second-generation IGRAs. Commercially available IGRAs do not have sufficient accuracy for diagnostic evaluation of suspected tuberculosis. Second-generation tests, however, might have sufficiently high sensitivity, low negative likelihood ratio, and correspondingly high negative predictive value in low-incidence settings to facilitate prompt rule-out of tuberculosis. National Institute for Health Research.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The clinical utility of interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) for diagnosis of active tuberculosis is unclear, although they are commonly used in countries with a low incidence of tuberculosis. We aimed to resolve this clinical uncertainty by determining the accuracy and utility of commercially available and second-generation IGRAs in the diagnostic assessment of suspected tuberculosis in a low-incidence setting.
METHODS
We did a prospective cohort study of adults with suspected tuberculosis in routine secondary care in England. Patients were tested for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection at baseline with commercially available (T-SPOT.TB and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube [QFT-GIT]) and second-generation (incorporating novel M tuberculosis antigens) IGRAs and followed up for 6-12 months to establish definitive diagnoses. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and predictive values of the tests were determined.
FINDINGS
Of the 1060 adults enrolled in the study, 845 were included in the analyses and 363 were diagnosed with tuberculosis. Sensitivity of T-SPOT.TB for all tuberculosis diagnosis, including culture-confirmed and highly probable cases, was 81·4% (95% CI 76·6-85·3), which was higher than QFT-GIT (67·3% [62·0-72·1]). Second-generation IGRAs had a sensitivity of 94·0% (90·0-96·4) for culture-confirmed tuberculosis and 89·2% (85·2-92·2) when including highly probable tuberculosis, giving a negative likelihood ratio for all tuberculosis cases of 0·13 (95% CI 0·10-0·19). Specificity ranged from 86·2% (95% CI 82·3-89·4) for T-SPOT.TB to 80·0% (75·6-83·8) for second-generation IGRAs.
INTERPRETATION
Commercially available IGRAs do not have sufficient accuracy for diagnostic evaluation of suspected tuberculosis. Second-generation tests, however, might have sufficiently high sensitivity, low negative likelihood ratio, and correspondingly high negative predictive value in low-incidence settings to facilitate prompt rule-out of tuberculosis.
FUNDING
National Institute for Health Research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30655049
pii: S1473-3099(18)30613-3
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30613-3
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antigens, Bacterial 0
Bacterial Proteins 0
CFP-10 protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosis 0
ESAT-6 protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosis 0

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study Observational Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

193-202

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 08/106/02
Pays : United Kingdom

Investigateurs

David Abdoyeku (D)
Robert Davidson (R)
Martin Dedicoat (M)
Heinke Kunst (H)
Michael R Loebingher (MR)
William Lynn (W)
Nazim Nathani (N)
Rebecca O'Connell (R)
Anton Pozniak (A)
Sarah Menzies (S)

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Type : ErratumIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Hilary S Whitworth (HS)

Tuberculosis Research Centre, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Amarjit Badhan (A)

Tuberculosis Research Centre, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Respiratory Infections, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Aime A Boakye (AA)

Tuberculosis Research Centre, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Respiratory Infections, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Yemisi Takwoingi (Y)

Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Melanie Rees-Roberts (M)

Tuberculosis Research Centre, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Respiratory Infections, Imperial College London, London, UK; Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.

Christopher Partlett (C)

Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Heather Lambie (H)

Tuberculosis Research Centre, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.

John Innes (J)

Heart of England National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

Graham Cooke (G)

Department of Infectious Diseases, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, UK.

Marc Lipman (M)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; University College London Respiratory, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.

Christopher Conlon (C)

Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.

Derek Macallan (D)

Infection Care Group, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK.

Felix Chua (F)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Frank A Post (FA)

Department of Sexual Health and HIV, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Martin Wiselka (M)

Department of Infection and Tropical Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.

Gerrit Woltmann (G)

Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Respiratory Biomedical Research Centre, Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Jonathan J Deeks (JJ)

Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Onn Min Kon (OM)

Tuberculosis Research Centre, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Respiratory Infections, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Ajit Lalvani (A)

Tuberculosis Research Centre, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Respiratory Infections, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: a.lalvani@imperial.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH