Examining perceptions of existing and newly created accessibility symbols.


Journal

Disability and health journal
ISSN: 1876-7583
Titre abrégé: Disabil Health J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101306633

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2019
Historique:
received: 07 06 2018
revised: 07 11 2018
accepted: 24 11 2018
pubmed: 19 1 2019
medline: 14 6 2019
entrez: 19 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Symbols are used to convey messages in a clear, understandable manner, without the use of written language. The most widely recognized symbol used to denote access for persons with disabilities is the International Symbol of Access. This symbol has been criticized for its inadequate representation of disability diversity poorly representing universal design of space and products. This descriptive study explored individual comprehension and perceptions of nine existing and newly created accessibility pictograph symbols and identified one that represented universal access to fitness equipment. A survey was disseminated electronically and face-to-face to individuals, groups and organizations affiliated with inclusive fitness equipment, space and programming. Quantitative data was analyzed for descriptive statistics, rank order of symbols and group comparisons of rankings. Thematic analysis of open-ended question results revealed themes to enhance understanding of symbol rank order. 981 participants completed the survey. Symbol four, shaped as a Venn diagram containing three icons representing individuals with varying ability levels, was ranked highest with no significant differences in group comparisons between participants with and without a disability and U.S. residents versus non-U.S. residents. 85.4% of participants demonstrated accurate comprehension of this symbol. Though symbol five had the same symbol rank median value, this symbol's distribution of scores was lower. Participants accurately comprehended symbol four and it was identified as the highest ranked symbol representing universal access to fitness equipment. Because of symbol unfamiliarity, adoption will require education and consistency of use and placement.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Symbols are used to convey messages in a clear, understandable manner, without the use of written language. The most widely recognized symbol used to denote access for persons with disabilities is the International Symbol of Access. This symbol has been criticized for its inadequate representation of disability diversity poorly representing universal design of space and products.
OBJECTIVE
This descriptive study explored individual comprehension and perceptions of nine existing and newly created accessibility pictograph symbols and identified one that represented universal access to fitness equipment.
METHODS
A survey was disseminated electronically and face-to-face to individuals, groups and organizations affiliated with inclusive fitness equipment, space and programming. Quantitative data was analyzed for descriptive statistics, rank order of symbols and group comparisons of rankings. Thematic analysis of open-ended question results revealed themes to enhance understanding of symbol rank order.
RESULTS
981 participants completed the survey. Symbol four, shaped as a Venn diagram containing three icons representing individuals with varying ability levels, was ranked highest with no significant differences in group comparisons between participants with and without a disability and U.S. residents versus non-U.S. residents. 85.4% of participants demonstrated accurate comprehension of this symbol. Though symbol five had the same symbol rank median value, this symbol's distribution of scores was lower.
CONCLUSIONS
Participants accurately comprehended symbol four and it was identified as the highest ranked symbol representing universal access to fitness equipment. Because of symbol unfamiliarity, adoption will require education and consistency of use and placement.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30655189
pii: S1936-6574(18)30244-9
doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.11.012
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

180-186

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Beth A Barstow (BA)

The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294-1212, United States. Electronic address: bbarstow@uab.edu.

Jason Vice (J)

The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294-1212, United States. Electronic address: jvice02@uab.edu.

Sean Bowman (S)

The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294-1212, United States. Electronic address: smbowman@uab.edu.

Tapan Mehta (T)

The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294-1212, United States. Electronic address: tapan@uab.edu.

Seanna Kringen (S)

Beneficial Designs, P.O. Box 69, Minden, NV, 89423, United States. Electronic address: seanna@beneficialdesigns.com.

Peter Axelson (P)

Beneficial Designs, P.O. Box 69, Minden, NV, 89423, United States. Electronic address: peter@beneficialdesigns.com.

Sangeetha Padalabalanarayanan (S)

The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294-1212, United States. Electronic address: sangee@uab.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH