Tibio-Femoral Contact Force Distribution is Not the Only Factor Governing Pivot Location after Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 01 2019
17 01 2019
Historique:
received:
09
05
2018
accepted:
30
11
2018
entrez:
19
1
2019
pubmed:
19
1
2019
medline:
1
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Total knee arthroplasty aims to mimic the natural knee kinematics by optimizing implant geometry, but it is not clear how loading relates to tibio-femoral anterior-posterior translation or internal-external pivoting. We hypothesised that the point of pivot in the transverse plane is governed by the location of the highest axial force. Tibio-femoral loading was measured using an instrumented tibial component in six total knee arthroplasty patients (aged 65-80y, 5-7y post-op) during 5-6 squat repetitions, while knee kinematics were captured using a mobile video-fluoroscope. In the range of congruent tibio-femoral contact the medial femoral condyle remained approximately static while the lateral condyle translated posteriorly by 4.1 mm (median). Beyond the congruent range, the medial and lateral condyle motions both abruptly changed to anterior sliding by 4.6 mm, and 2.6 mm respectively. On average, both the axial loading and pivot position were more medial near extension, and transferred to the lateral side in flexion. However, no consistent relationship between pivoting and load distribution was found across all patients throughout flexion, with R
Identifiants
pubmed: 30655583
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37189-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-018-37189-z
pmc: PMC6336768
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
182Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Nov;82(8):1189-95
pubmed: 11132285
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Nov;82(8):1196-8
pubmed: 11132286
Radiology. 1975 Sep;116(3):585-94
pubmed: 1153764
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Jan;84(1):50-3
pubmed: 11837832
J Rheumatol. 2002 Mar;29(3):554-6
pubmed: 11908572
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 May;84(4):607-13
pubmed: 12043788
J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jun;17(4):416-21
pubmed: 12066269
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 May;(410):114-30
pubmed: 12771822
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Nov;(416):37-57
pubmed: 14646738
J Biomech. 2004 Oct;37(10):1499-504
pubmed: 15336924
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Sep;(426):187-93
pubmed: 15346072
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov;(428):180-9
pubmed: 15534541
J Biomech. 2005 Feb;38(2):241-53
pubmed: 15598450
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007 Jan;22(1):52-8
pubmed: 17029673
J Biomech. 2007;40 Suppl 1:S4-10
pubmed: 17433815
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Dec;(273):253-60
pubmed: 1959278
Knee. 2010 Jan;17(1):33-7
pubmed: 19631548
J Biomech. 2010 Aug 10;43(11):2164-73
pubmed: 20537336
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Nov 26;13:231
pubmed: 23181354
J Biomech. 2013 Apr 26;46(7):1351-7
pubmed: 23499227
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 02;8(12):e81036
pubmed: 24312522
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 May;66(5):1218-27
pubmed: 24470261
Knee. 2015 Dec;22(6):522-6
pubmed: 25999125
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Mar;31(3):694-701
pubmed: 26614750
J Biomech. 2016 Jun 14;49(9):1794-1801
pubmed: 27173594
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 28;11(7):e0159600
pubmed: 27467744
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 23;11(11):e0167106
pubmed: 27880849
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jun;99-B(6):779-787
pubmed: 28566397
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jun;26(6):1645-1655
pubmed: 28656456
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 9;12(10):e0185952
pubmed: 29016647
J Biomech. 2017 Dec 8;65:32-39
pubmed: 29037443
Arthritis Rheum. 1968 Dec;11(6):705-33
pubmed: 5700639
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Nov;(356):47-57
pubmed: 9917667