Prediction of survival benefit when deciding between chemotherapy and best supportive therapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
advanced gastric cancer
best supportive care
chemotherapy
elderly patients
prognostic factor
Journal
Molecular and clinical oncology
ISSN: 2049-9450
Titre abrégé: Mol Clin Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101613422
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
18
07
2018
accepted:
13
11
2018
entrez:
19
1
2019
pubmed:
19
1
2019
medline:
19
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It remains unclear whether elderly patients (EPs) with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) benefit from chemotherapy. The aim of the present study was to examine the prognostic factors for EPs with AGC in order to generate a prognosis-predicting scoring system. This single-center retrospective study examined consecutive patients with AGC between April 2012 and July 2017. Risk factors for survival in EPs aged ≥75 years were identified using a Cox proportional hazards model, and a prognostic scoring system was generated and retrospectively evaluated to determine its usefulness for predicting patient prognosis. A total of 61 patients were enrolled as EPs (mean age, 81 years) and compared with 80 non-EPs (mean age, 66 years). The median survival time (MST) was significantly longer for non-EPs compared with that for EPs (3.8 vs. 10.1 months, respectively; P=0.0447). Among the EPs, 29 (48%) received chemotherapy and 32 received best supportive care (BSC). A total of 68 non-EPs (85%) received chemotherapy and 12 non-EPs received BSC. Among EPs with AGC, age-adjusted multivariate analysis revealed that performance status (PS), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR)<4, intestinal-type histology and chemotherapy were significant prognostic factors. To predict EPs too frail for chemotherapy prior to treatment, one point was assigned for a PS of 1, diffuse-type histology and NLR≥4, whereas 2 points were assigned for PS≥2, and the point totals for each patient were calculated. A cut-off point of 2 had the best P-value by the log-rank test and was used to divide the patients into low-risk (LoR: Score 0-1) and high-risk (HiR: Score 2-4) groups. The MST of the LoR and HiR groups was 23.6 and 3.6 months, respectively (P<0.001). As regards treatment strategies and risk groups, the LoR chemotherapy group had the best prognosis (P=0.0010), and LoR EPs who were administered chemotherapy had a longer MST (30.3 months) compared with EPs who received BSC (8.7 months). In conclusion, scoring systems using PS, histology and NLR may be useful when considering chemotherapy in EPs with AGC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30655981
doi: 10.3892/mco.2018.1772
pii: MCO-0-0-1772
pmc: PMC6313942
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
83-91Références
N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 30;341(27):2061-7
pubmed: 10615079
Nutr Cancer. 2002;42(2):191-3
pubmed: 12416259
Br J Cancer. 2003 Sep 15;89(6):1028-30
pubmed: 12966420
Gastric Cancer. 2004;7(3):154-9
pubmed: 15449203
Oncologist. 2005 Mar;10(3):198-204
pubmed: 15793223
Lancet Oncol. 2008 Mar;9(3):215-21
pubmed: 18282805
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010 May;65(6):1093-9
pubmed: 19727730
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 20;28(9):1547-53
pubmed: 20159816
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;(3):CD004064
pubmed: 20238327
Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74
pubmed: 21376230
Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;14(2):97-100
pubmed: 21573921
BMC Cancer. 2011 Nov 21;11:489
pubmed: 22103888
J Chemother. 2014 Feb;26(1):57-61
pubmed: 24090674
Br J Cancer. 2014 Jan 7;110(1):183-8
pubmed: 24201751
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 18;9(3):e92079
pubmed: 24642859
Ann Oncol. 2015 Feb;26(2):288-300
pubmed: 24936581
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 17;9(11):e111906
pubmed: 25401500
Pancreatology. 2015 Jul-Aug;15(4):327-30
pubmed: 25975490
Oncology. 2016;90(6):321-6
pubmed: 27225990
J Cancer Res Ther. 2016 Apr-Jun;12(2):945-51
pubmed: 27461679
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Nov;12(11):2447-52
pubmed: 7964962
Cancer. 1995 Jul 15;76(2):333-8
pubmed: 8625111
J Surg Oncol. 1996 Sep;63(1):36-40
pubmed: 8841464
Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 1997 Jun;34(6):499-505
pubmed: 9301266