Remote ischemic conditioning for stroke: clinical data, challenges, and future directions.
Brain
/ blood supply
Brain Ischemia
/ prevention & control
Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases
/ prevention & control
Humans
Intracranial Arteriosclerosis
/ prevention & control
Ischemic Preconditioning
/ methods
Stents
Stroke
/ prevention & control
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
/ prevention & control
Treatment Outcome
Journal
Annals of clinical and translational neurology
ISSN: 2328-9503
Titre abrégé: Ann Clin Transl Neurol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101623278
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
27
08
2018
revised:
11
10
2018
accepted:
15
10
2018
entrez:
19
1
2019
pubmed:
19
1
2019
medline:
19
1
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite great improvement during the past several decades, the management of stroke is still far from satisfactory, which warrants alternative or adjunctive strategies. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), an easy-to-use and noninvasive therapy, can be performed in various clinical scenarios (e.g., prehospital transportation, intrahospital, and at home), and it has been widely investigated for stroke management. RIC has been demonstrated to be well tolerated in patients with acute ischemic stroke and aneurysm subarachnoid hemorrhage, and it may benefit these patients by improving clinical outcomes; in patients with intracranial atherosclerosis, long-term repeated RIC could be safely performed and benefit patients by reducing recurrent ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack, as well as improving cerebral perfusion status; long-term repeated RIC may also benefit patients with cerebral small vessel disease by slowing cognitive decline and reducing volume of white matter hyperintensities on brain MRI; in patients with severe carotid atherosclerotic stenosis undergoing stenting, preprocedural RIC could reduce the odds of new brain lesions on postprocedural MRI. Previous clinical studies suggest broad future prospects of RIC in the field of cerebrovascular diseases. However, the optimal RIC protocol and the mechanisms that RIC protects the brain is not fully clear, and there is lack of sensitive and specific biomarkers of RIC, all these dilemmas prevent RIC from entering clinical practice. This review focuses on recent advances in clinical studies of RIC in stroke management, its challenges, and the potential directions of future studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30656197
doi: 10.1002/acn3.691
pii: ACN3691
pmc: PMC6331204
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
186-196Références
Stroke. 2003 Oct;34(10):2361-6
pubmed: 12947158
J Neurol Sci. 2004 Nov 15;226(1-2):81-7
pubmed: 15537526
Nat Med. 2010 Jul;16(7):760-2
pubmed: 20613755
Int J Stroke. 2013 Feb;8(2):141-6
pubmed: 22463392
Circulation. 1993 Mar;87(3):893-9
pubmed: 7680290
Lancet. 2010 Mar 20;375(9719):985-97
pubmed: 20189239
Neurotherapeutics. 2015 Jul;12(3):667-77
pubmed: 25956401
Redox Biol. 2017 Aug;12:491-498
pubmed: 28334684
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016 Apr;13(4):193-209
pubmed: 26843289
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):e46-e110
pubmed: 29367334
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2016 Apr;22(2 Dementia):490-509
pubmed: 27042905
Transl Stroke Res. 2016 Feb;7(1):42-8
pubmed: 26630942
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2010 Aug;44(6):434-9
pubmed: 20484064
Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31
pubmed: 26898852
Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10):e146-e603
pubmed: 28122885
Lancet. 2014 Mar 15;383(9921):984-98
pubmed: 24007975
Neurosurgery. 2014 Nov;75(5):590-8; discussion 598
pubmed: 25072112
Basic Res Cardiol. 2016 Mar;111(2):10
pubmed: 26768477
JAMA. 2015 Apr 14;313(14):1451-62
pubmed: 25871671
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 05;7:CD012503
pubmed: 29974450
Circulation. 1986 Nov;74(5):1124-36
pubmed: 3769170
Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(3):161-76
pubmed: 26505981
Aging Dis. 2018 Feb 1;9(1):165-171
pubmed: 29392091
Neurology. 2012 Oct 30;79(18):1853-61
pubmed: 23035060
Neurology. 2002 Dec 10;59(11):1750-8
pubmed: 12473764
Stroke. 2017 Nov;48(11):3064-3072
pubmed: 29042490
Int J Stroke. 2016 Oct;11(7):831-8
pubmed: 27312678
Basic Res Cardiol. 2016 Nov;111(6):70
pubmed: 27766474
Circulation. 2015 Oct 27;132(17):1667-78
pubmed: 26503749
Lancet. 2010 Jul 10;376(9735):112-23
pubmed: 20561675
Circulation. 2012 Dec 18;126(25):3054-61
pubmed: 23159552
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Jun 6;282(6279):1847-51
pubmed: 6786649
J Exp Med. 2018 Oct 1;215(10):2636-2654
pubmed: 30190288
Stroke. 2014 Jul;45(7):2160-236
pubmed: 24788967
Circulation. 2014 Oct 14;130(16):1407-14
pubmed: 25311618
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2015 Nov;49(8):220-7
pubmed: 26574485
Stroke. 2015 Jun;46(6):1740-7
pubmed: 25882050
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):686-694
pubmed: 28024850
Stroke. 2000 May;31(5):1062-8
pubmed: 10797166
J Neurol. 2001 Apr;248(4):271-8
pubmed: 11374090
Stroke. 2001 Dec 1;32(12):2735-40
pubmed: 11739965
Stroke. 2012 Jun;43(6):1496-504
pubmed: 22511006
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018 Jun 06;5(7):850-856
pubmed: 30009202
Stroke. 2017 May;48(5):1412-1415
pubmed: 28265014
J Neurol Sci. 2018 Jul 15;390:77-83
pubmed: 29801912
Lancet. 2005 Jan 29-Feb 4;365(9457):387-97
pubmed: 15680453
Cell Transplant. 2015;24(9):1901-11
pubmed: 25198862
Stroke. 2017 Dec;48(12):3289-3294
pubmed: 29127270
Lancet Neurol. 2010 Apr;9(4):353-62
pubmed: 20189458
Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Oct;27(7):883-7
pubmed: 23790765
Nat Rev Neurol. 2015 Dec;11(12):698-710
pubmed: 26585977
Pract Neurol. 2008 Aug;8(4):222-8
pubmed: 18644908
Int J Stroke. 2016 Oct;11(8):938-943
pubmed: 27412192
Eur Neurol. 2016;76(1-2):28-34
pubmed: 27351719
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Sep 29;5(10):
pubmed: 27688236
J Neurol. 2015 Nov;262(11):2411-9
pubmed: 25976029
Circulation. 2017 Apr 4;135(14):1325-1335
pubmed: 28174194
Stroke. 2011 May;42(5):1387-91
pubmed: 21415404
Stroke. 2014 Jan;45(1):159-67
pubmed: 24203849