Thrombin generation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma during the first three cycles of treatment: An observational cohort study.

blood coagulation tests heparin multiple myeloma thalidomide thrombosis

Journal

Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis
ISSN: 2475-0379
Titre abrégé: Res Pract Thromb Haemost
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101703775

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Historique:
received: 27 08 2018
accepted: 29 09 2018
entrez: 19 1 2019
pubmed: 19 1 2019
medline: 19 1 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with a high risk of thrombosis, particularly during the first months of treatment including immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). There is no consensus on prevention of thromboembolic risk in patients with de novo MM, and identification of patients requiring anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis remains challenging. Evaluating coagulability by an in vitro thrombin generation (TG) test might be a way of identifying such patients. To determine whether TG assessment could reveal an increase in coagulability during the first three chemotherapy cycles. This prospective and longitudinal observational study included patients newly diagnosed with MM. TG was determined in platelet-rich and platelet-poor plasma using calibrated automated thrombography with a low tissue factor (TF) concentration. Seventy-one patients were enrolled, allowing TG analysis during 213 chemotherapy cycles. TG remained unchanged throughout follow-up irrespective of treatment regimen, but values determined before cycles 2 and 3 were significantly higher in patients receiving iMiDs-containing regimens. No association was found between TG and its changes and thrombosis occurrence during follow-up: venous thrombosis in eight patients; no cardiovascular event. A significantly (87%) lower risk of venous thrombosis was observed in patients receiving prophylaxis with a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH; OR: 0.13 (95% CI: 0.02-0.76). Neither bortezomib- nor dexamethasone-containing regimens were associated with thrombotic risk. Changes in TG, as studied, were not associated with thrombotic events. The only factor associated with a reduction in early thrombotic risk was prophylaxis with LMWH. The issue of how to identify patients requiring prophylactic anticoagulation remains unresolved.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with a high risk of thrombosis, particularly during the first months of treatment including immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). There is no consensus on prevention of thromboembolic risk in patients with de novo MM, and identification of patients requiring anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis remains challenging. Evaluating coagulability by an in vitro thrombin generation (TG) test might be a way of identifying such patients.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To determine whether TG assessment could reveal an increase in coagulability during the first three chemotherapy cycles.
METHODS METHODS
This prospective and longitudinal observational study included patients newly diagnosed with MM. TG was determined in platelet-rich and platelet-poor plasma using calibrated automated thrombography with a low tissue factor (TF) concentration.
RESULTS RESULTS
Seventy-one patients were enrolled, allowing TG analysis during 213 chemotherapy cycles. TG remained unchanged throughout follow-up irrespective of treatment regimen, but values determined before cycles 2 and 3 were significantly higher in patients receiving iMiDs-containing regimens. No association was found between TG and its changes and thrombosis occurrence during follow-up: venous thrombosis in eight patients; no cardiovascular event. A significantly (87%) lower risk of venous thrombosis was observed in patients receiving prophylaxis with a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH; OR: 0.13 (95% CI: 0.02-0.76). Neither bortezomib- nor dexamethasone-containing regimens were associated with thrombotic risk. Changes in TG, as studied, were not associated with thrombotic events.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The only factor associated with a reduction in early thrombotic risk was prophylaxis with LMWH. The issue of how to identify patients requiring prophylactic anticoagulation remains unresolved.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30656281
doi: 10.1002/rth2.12161
pii: S2475-0379(22)01508-4
pmc: PMC6332829
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

89-98

Références

Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2017 Jun;65:1-7
pubmed: 28365523
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2016 Sep;22(6):554-62
pubmed: 26759370
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2011 Apr;11(2):228-36
pubmed: 21575928
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2015 Sep;26(6):621-7
pubmed: 26083985
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2018 Dec 13;3(1):89-98
pubmed: 30656281
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 20;29(15):2099-103
pubmed: 21464402
Haematologica. 2012 Oct;97(10):1603-7
pubmed: 22511493
Cancer. 2007 Nov 15;110(10):2339-46
pubmed: 17918266
J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2001 Oct;10(5):657-60
pubmed: 11672511
J Thromb Haemost. 2011 Apr;9(4):653-63
pubmed: 21255254
JAMA. 2005 Feb 9;293(6):715-22
pubmed: 15701913
Thromb Res. 2016 Sep;145:119-25
pubmed: 27536894
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jan;11(1):29-37
pubmed: 19853510
Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Apr;58(4):941-949
pubmed: 27931131
Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb. 2002 Sep-Dec;32(5-6):249-53
pubmed: 13679651
Haematologica. 2007 Feb;92(2):279-80
pubmed: 17296591
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017 May;113:195-212
pubmed: 28427509
J Thromb Haemost. 2009 Oct;7(10):1639-48
pubmed: 19656279
Ann Hematol. 2012 Nov;91(11):1779-84
pubmed: 22773209
Thromb Res. 2016 Jul;143:101-2
pubmed: 27208979
Blood. 2012 Jan 26;119(4):933-9; quiz 1093
pubmed: 21835953
Blood. 2010 Jul 8;116(1):22-6
pubmed: 20339094
Br J Haematol. 2006 Aug;134(4):399-405
pubmed: 16882132
Thromb J. 2006 Aug 21;4:11
pubmed: 16923190
Cancer. 2012 Jan 15;118(2):549-57
pubmed: 21720994
Am J Hematol. 2016 Oct;91(10):E455-6
pubmed: 27341647
Leuk Res. 2008 Jul;32(7):1078-84
pubmed: 18241919
Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2017 Jul;66:47-49
pubmed: 28865304
Leuk Lymphoma. 2015;56(12):3418-25
pubmed: 25907422
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 10;29(8):986-93
pubmed: 21282540
Thromb Haemost. 2005 Dec;94(6):1341-3
pubmed: 16411420

Auteurs

Emilie Chalayer (E)

Centre d'Investigation Clinique Inserm CIC 1408 CHU de Saint-Etienne Saint-Etienne France.

Brigitte Tardy-Poncet (B)

INSERM U1059, Equipe DVH Université J Monnet Saint-Etienne France.

Lionel Karlin (L)

Service d'Hématologie Clinique Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon Lyon France.

Céline Chapelle (C)

Unité de Recherche Clinique Innovation et Pharmacologie CHU de Saint-Etienne Saint-Etienne France.

Aurélie Montmartin (A)

INSERM U1059, Equipe DVH Université J Monnet Saint-Etienne France.

Michèle Piot (M)

INSERM U1059, Equipe DVH Université J Monnet Saint-Etienne France.

Denis Guyotat (D)

Service d'Hématologie Clinique Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth Saint-Etienne France.

Philippe Collet (P)

Service de Rhumatologie CHU Saint-Etienne Saint-Etienne France.

Thomas Lecompte (T)

Department of Medical Specialties University Hospitals of Geneva, and GpG-Faculty of Medicine Geneva University Geneva Switzerland.

Bernard Tardy (B)

Centre d'Investigation Clinique Inserm CIC 1408 CHU de Saint-Etienne Saint-Etienne France.

Classifications MeSH