Underestimation of pelvic organ prolapse in the supine straining position, based on magnetic resonance imaging findings.
Extent
Prolapse
Pubococcygeal line
Strain
Upright MRI
Journal
International urogynecology journal
ISSN: 1433-3023
Titre abrégé: Int Urogynecol J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101567041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2019
11 2019
Historique:
received:
13
07
2018
accepted:
28
12
2018
pubmed:
19
1
2019
medline:
2
4
2020
entrez:
19
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is clinically diagnosed in the supine position, where the effect of gravity is simulated by having the patients put strain on their pelvic floor. The objective of this study was to determine the degree of POP underestimation in the supine position based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. This prospective study was conducted with symptomatic POP grade ≥ 2 patients. Fifteen female patients were examined with an MRI system that allows supine and upright imaging. The differences between supine and upright in distances of the bladder neck, cervix, and pouch of Douglas from the pubococcygeal line (PCL) were estimated, together with changes in the genital hiatal area. Patients were scanned at rest and during straining. All distances were compared using the Wilcoxon ranking test. All mean distances from the PCL increased from the supine-strain to the upright-rest and from the supine-strain to the upright-strain position. These distances were found in the supine and upright positions: the bladder descended 1.3 cm to 1.4 cm, the cervix 1.1 cm to 2.2 cm, and the pouch of Douglas 0.8 cm to 1.5 cm respectively (all p values <0.05). The hiatal area was larger in the upright-strain position (mean 42.0 cm Upright MRI scanning of patients with POP grade ≥ 2 both at rest and during straining shows a significantly larger extent of the prolapse than that observed during supine straining.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30656361
doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-03862-0
pii: 10.1007/s00192-018-03862-0
pmc: PMC6834735
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1939-1944Références
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jul-Aug;20(4):222-7
pubmed: 24978089
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar;17(2):67-9
pubmed: 22453690
Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Jul;38(7):695-9
pubmed: 7607027
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Nov;26(11):1559-73
pubmed: 25966804
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 May;20(5):541-9
pubmed: 19221680
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Sep;169(3):775-9
pubmed: 9275895
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jul;96(1):18-22
pubmed: 10862835
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Jul;173(1):31-7
pubmed: 10397095
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Sep;24(9):1421-8
pubmed: 23640002
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;30(3):346-50
pubmed: 17702054
Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Nov;12(11):E453-E460
pubmed: 29989885
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jun;25(6):580-5
pubmed: 15883982
J Med Life. 2011 Jan-Mar;4(1):75-81
pubmed: 21505577
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Oct;20(10):1169-74
pubmed: 19597719
Clin Radiol. 1996 Nov;51(11):785-90
pubmed: 8937321
Eur Radiol. 2017 May;27(5):2067-2085
pubmed: 27488850
Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(3):191-7
pubmed: 17696158
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Nov;23(11):1547-54
pubmed: 22531955
JAMA. 2008 Sep 17;300(11):1311-6
pubmed: 18799443
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:6594152
pubmed: 26880893
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1160-6
pubmed: 12066091
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Oct;21(10):1247-51
pubmed: 20544342