Segment 2/3 Hypertrophy is Greater When Right Portal Vein Embolisation is Extended to Segment 4 in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Retrospective Cohort Study.


Journal

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
ISSN: 1432-086X
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003538

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Historique:
received: 06 10 2018
accepted: 29 12 2018
pubmed: 19 1 2019
medline: 2 5 2019
entrez: 19 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), right portal vein embolisation (RPVE) is used to increase the volume of the future remnant liver (FRL) before major hepatic resection. It is not established whether embolisation of segment 4 in addition RPVE (RPVE + 4) induces greater hypertrophy of the FRL. Limitations of prior studies include heterogenous populations and use of hypertrophy metrics sensitive to baseline variables. From 2010 to 2015, consecutive patients undergoing RPVE or RPVE + 4 for CRLM, who had not undergone prior major hepatic resection and in whom imaging was available, were included in a retrospective study. Data were extracted from hospital electronic records. Volumetric assessments of segments 2-3 were made on cross-sectional imaging before and after embolisation and corrected for standardised liver volume. Ninety-nine patients underwent PVE, and 60 met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-eight patients underwent RPVE, and 22 underwent RPVE + 4. Forty-five patients had undergone median 6 cycles of prior chemotherapy. Eighteen patients had FRL metastases at PVE, and 16 had undergone subsegmental metastasectomy in the FRL. Assessments of the degree of hypertrophy (DH) of segments 2/3 were made at median 35 (interquartile range 30-49) days after PVE. RPVE + 4 resulted in a significantly greater increase in DH than RPVE (7.7 ± 1.8% vs 11.3 ± 2.6%, p = 0.011). No confounding association between baseline variables and the decision to undertake RPVE or RPVE + 4 was identified. Median survival was 2.4 years and was not influenced by segment 4 embolisation. RPVE + 4 results in greater DH of segments 2/3 than RPVE in people with CLRM.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), right portal vein embolisation (RPVE) is used to increase the volume of the future remnant liver (FRL) before major hepatic resection. It is not established whether embolisation of segment 4 in addition RPVE (RPVE + 4) induces greater hypertrophy of the FRL. Limitations of prior studies include heterogenous populations and use of hypertrophy metrics sensitive to baseline variables.
METHODS METHODS
From 2010 to 2015, consecutive patients undergoing RPVE or RPVE + 4 for CRLM, who had not undergone prior major hepatic resection and in whom imaging was available, were included in a retrospective study. Data were extracted from hospital electronic records. Volumetric assessments of segments 2-3 were made on cross-sectional imaging before and after embolisation and corrected for standardised liver volume.
RESULTS RESULTS
Ninety-nine patients underwent PVE, and 60 met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-eight patients underwent RPVE, and 22 underwent RPVE + 4. Forty-five patients had undergone median 6 cycles of prior chemotherapy. Eighteen patients had FRL metastases at PVE, and 16 had undergone subsegmental metastasectomy in the FRL. Assessments of the degree of hypertrophy (DH) of segments 2/3 were made at median 35 (interquartile range 30-49) days after PVE. RPVE + 4 resulted in a significantly greater increase in DH than RPVE (7.7 ± 1.8% vs 11.3 ± 2.6%, p = 0.011). No confounding association between baseline variables and the decision to undertake RPVE or RPVE + 4 was identified. Median survival was 2.4 years and was not influenced by segment 4 embolisation.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
RPVE + 4 results in greater DH of segments 2/3 than RPVE in people with CLRM.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30656390
doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-02159-5
pii: 10.1007/s00270-018-02159-5
pmc: PMC6394476
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

552-559

Références

Br J Surg. 1999 Jun;86(6):784-8
pubmed: 10383579
Hepatology. 2001 Aug;34(2):267-72
pubmed: 11481611
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2012 Mar;3(1):28-40
pubmed: 22811867
Ann Surg. 2003 Feb;237(2):208-17
pubmed: 12560779
HPB (Oxford). 2012 Jan;14(1):14-9
pubmed: 22151446
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Jun;33(3):452-6
pubmed: 20130875
Ann Surg. 2008 Jan;247(1):49-57
pubmed: 18156923
Cancer Imaging. 2017 Sep 20;17(1):25
pubmed: 28931429
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Aug;17(8):1447-51
pubmed: 23715651
Br J Surg. 2011 Jun;98(6):825-34
pubmed: 21484773
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 May;16(5):1202-7
pubmed: 19130138
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Jan;18(1):45-51
pubmed: 24129824
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Feb;36(1):25-34
pubmed: 22806245
Br J Surg. 2010 Feb;97(2):240-50
pubmed: 20087967
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jul;15(7):1908-17
pubmed: 18459005
Surgery. 2003 May;133(5):495-506
pubmed: 12773977
Arch Surg. 2005 Nov;140(11):1100-3
pubmed: 16301448
Radiographics. 2002 Sep-Oct;22(5):1063-76
pubmed: 12235336
Surgery. 2004 Apr;135(4):404-10
pubmed: 15041964
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Jan;19(1):133-41; discussion 141
pubmed: 25091849
Dig Surg. 2012;29(1):6-17
pubmed: 22441614
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jul;20(7):1317-23
pubmed: 27073080
Surgery. 2000 Feb;127(2):155-60
pubmed: 10686980
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(11):3709-3717
pubmed: 27272106
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Dec;27(12):1897-1905.e1
pubmed: 27435682
Ann Surg. 2009 Oct;250(4):540-8
pubmed: 19730239
Ann Surg. 1996 Jan;223(1):77-83
pubmed: 8554422
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;113(4):449-55
pubmed: 26955907
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005 Feb;16(2 Pt 1):215-25
pubmed: 15713922
World J Surg. 1986 Oct;10(5):803-8
pubmed: 3022488
Br J Surg. 2007 Nov;94(11):1386-94
pubmed: 17583900
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Apr;25(4):608-17
pubmed: 24315549
Surgery. 2008 Nov;144(5):744-51
pubmed: 19081016
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Aug;17(8):2081-9
pubmed: 20237856
Liver Transpl. 2002 Mar;8(3):233-40
pubmed: 11910568
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2012 Jun;29(2):81-9
pubmed: 23729977
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012 Oct;35(5):999-1008
pubmed: 22173639
J Gastrointest Surg. 2003 Mar-Apr;7(3):325-30
pubmed: 12654556
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Oct;15(10):2765-72
pubmed: 18636296

Auteurs

Christopher J Hammond (CJ)

Department of Vascular Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Great George Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK. christopherhammond@nhs.net.

Saadat Ali (S)

University of Leeds Medical School, Leeds, UK.

Hafizul Haq (H)

University of Leeds Medical School, Leeds, UK.

Lorna Luo (L)

University of Leeds Medical School, Leeds, UK.

Judith I Wyatt (JI)

Department of Pathology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Giles J Toogood (GJ)

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

J Peter A Lodge (JPA)

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Jai V Patel (JV)

Department of Vascular Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Great George Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH