Methotrexate for psoriatic arthritis.
Journal
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Jan 2019
18 Jan 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
19
1
2019
medline:
11
4
2019
entrez:
19
1
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Psoriatic arthritis is an inflammatory disease associated with joint damage, impaired function, pain, and reduced quality of life. Methotrexate is a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) commonly prescribed to alleviate symptoms, attenuate disease activity, and prevent progression of disease. To assess the benefits and harms of methotrexate for psoriatic arthritis in adults. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and www.clinicaltrials.gov for relevant records. We searched all databases from inception to 29 January 2018. We handsearched included articles for additional records and contacted study authors for additional unpublished data. We applied no language restrictions. We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared methotrexate versus placebo, or versus another DMARD, for adults with psoriatic arthritis. We reported on the following major outcomes: disease response (measured by psoriatic arthritis response criteria (PsARC)), function (measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire for Rheumatoid Arthritis (HAQ)), health-related quality of life, disease activity (measured by disease activity score (28 joints) with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR)), radiographic progression, serious adverse events, and withdrawals due to adverse events. Two review authors independently reviewed search results, assessed risk of bias, extracted trial data, and assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach. We undertook meta-analysis only when this was meaningful. We included in this review eight RCTs conducted in an outpatient setting, in Italy, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, China, Russia, and Bangladesh. Five studies compared methotrexate versus placebo, and four studies compared methotrexate versus other DMARDs. The average age of participants varied across studies (26 to 52 years), as did the average duration of psoriatic arthritis (one to nine years). Doses of methotrexate varied from 7.5 mg to 25 mg orally per week, but most studies administered approximately 15 mg or less orally per week. Risk of bias was generally unclear or high across most domains for all studies. We considered only one study to have low risk of selection and detection bias. The main study informing results of the primary comparison (methotrexate vs placebo up to six months) was at low risk of bias for all domains except attrition bias and reporting bias.We restricted reporting of results to the comparison of methotrexate versus placebo for up to six months. Low-quality evidence (downgraded due to bias and imprecision) from a single study (221 participants; methotrexate dose 15 mg orally or less per week) informed results for disease response, function, and disease activity. Disease response, measured by the proportion who responded to treatment according to PsARC (response indicates improvement), was 41/109 in the methotrexate group and 24/112 in the placebo group (risk ratio (RR) 1.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 2.70). This equates to an absolute difference of 16% more responders with methotrexate (4% more to 28% more), and a number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) of 6 (95% CI 5 to 25). Mean function, measured by the HAQ (scale 0 to 3; 0 meaning no functional impairment; minimum clinically important difference 0.22), was 1.0 points with placebo and 0.3 points better (95% 0.51 better to 0.09 better) with methotrexate; absolute improvement was 10% (3% better to 17% better), and relative improvement 30% (9% better to 51% better). Mean disease activity as measured by the DAS28-ESR (scale of 0 to 10; lower score means lower disease activity; minimum clinically important difference unknown) was 3.8 points in the methotrexate group and 4.06 points in the placebo group; mean difference was -0.26 points (95% CI -0.65 to 0.13); absolute improvement was 3% (7% better to 1% worse), and relative improvement 6% (16% better to 3% worse).Low-quality evidence (downgraded due to risk of bias and imprecision) from three studies (n = 293) informed our results for serious adverse events and withdrawals due to adverse events. Due to low event rates, we are uncertain if methotrexate results show increased risk of serious adverse events or withdrawals due to adverse events compared to placebo. Results show 1/141 serious adverse events in the methotrexate group and 4/152 in the placebo group: RR 0.26 (95% CI 0.03 to 2.26); absolute difference was 2% fewer events with methotrexate (5% fewer to 1% more). In all, 9/141 withdrawals in the methotrexate group were due to adverse events and 7/152 in the placebo group: RR 1.32 (95% CI 0.51 to 3.42); absolute difference was 1% more withdrawals (4% fewer to 6% more).One study measured health-related quality of life but did not report these results. No study measured radiographic progression. Low-quality evidence suggests that low-dose (15 mg or less) oral methotrexate might be slightly more effective than placebo when taken for six months; however we are uncertain if it is more harmful. Effects of methotrexate on health-related quality of life, radiographic progression, enthesitis, dactylitis, and fatigue; its benefits beyond six months; and effects of higher-dose methotrexate have not been measured or reported in a randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Psoriatic arthritis is an inflammatory disease associated with joint damage, impaired function, pain, and reduced quality of life. Methotrexate is a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) commonly prescribed to alleviate symptoms, attenuate disease activity, and prevent progression of disease.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To assess the benefits and harms of methotrexate for psoriatic arthritis in adults.
SEARCH METHODS
METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and www.clinicaltrials.gov for relevant records. We searched all databases from inception to 29 January 2018. We handsearched included articles for additional records and contacted study authors for additional unpublished data. We applied no language restrictions.
SELECTION CRITERIA
METHODS
We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared methotrexate versus placebo, or versus another DMARD, for adults with psoriatic arthritis. We reported on the following major outcomes: disease response (measured by psoriatic arthritis response criteria (PsARC)), function (measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire for Rheumatoid Arthritis (HAQ)), health-related quality of life, disease activity (measured by disease activity score (28 joints) with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR)), radiographic progression, serious adverse events, and withdrawals due to adverse events.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
METHODS
Two review authors independently reviewed search results, assessed risk of bias, extracted trial data, and assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach. We undertook meta-analysis only when this was meaningful.
MAIN RESULTS
RESULTS
We included in this review eight RCTs conducted in an outpatient setting, in Italy, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, China, Russia, and Bangladesh. Five studies compared methotrexate versus placebo, and four studies compared methotrexate versus other DMARDs. The average age of participants varied across studies (26 to 52 years), as did the average duration of psoriatic arthritis (one to nine years). Doses of methotrexate varied from 7.5 mg to 25 mg orally per week, but most studies administered approximately 15 mg or less orally per week. Risk of bias was generally unclear or high across most domains for all studies. We considered only one study to have low risk of selection and detection bias. The main study informing results of the primary comparison (methotrexate vs placebo up to six months) was at low risk of bias for all domains except attrition bias and reporting bias.We restricted reporting of results to the comparison of methotrexate versus placebo for up to six months. Low-quality evidence (downgraded due to bias and imprecision) from a single study (221 participants; methotrexate dose 15 mg orally or less per week) informed results for disease response, function, and disease activity. Disease response, measured by the proportion who responded to treatment according to PsARC (response indicates improvement), was 41/109 in the methotrexate group and 24/112 in the placebo group (risk ratio (RR) 1.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 2.70). This equates to an absolute difference of 16% more responders with methotrexate (4% more to 28% more), and a number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) of 6 (95% CI 5 to 25). Mean function, measured by the HAQ (scale 0 to 3; 0 meaning no functional impairment; minimum clinically important difference 0.22), was 1.0 points with placebo and 0.3 points better (95% 0.51 better to 0.09 better) with methotrexate; absolute improvement was 10% (3% better to 17% better), and relative improvement 30% (9% better to 51% better). Mean disease activity as measured by the DAS28-ESR (scale of 0 to 10; lower score means lower disease activity; minimum clinically important difference unknown) was 3.8 points in the methotrexate group and 4.06 points in the placebo group; mean difference was -0.26 points (95% CI -0.65 to 0.13); absolute improvement was 3% (7% better to 1% worse), and relative improvement 6% (16% better to 3% worse).Low-quality evidence (downgraded due to risk of bias and imprecision) from three studies (n = 293) informed our results for serious adverse events and withdrawals due to adverse events. Due to low event rates, we are uncertain if methotrexate results show increased risk of serious adverse events or withdrawals due to adverse events compared to placebo. Results show 1/141 serious adverse events in the methotrexate group and 4/152 in the placebo group: RR 0.26 (95% CI 0.03 to 2.26); absolute difference was 2% fewer events with methotrexate (5% fewer to 1% more). In all, 9/141 withdrawals in the methotrexate group were due to adverse events and 7/152 in the placebo group: RR 1.32 (95% CI 0.51 to 3.42); absolute difference was 1% more withdrawals (4% fewer to 6% more).One study measured health-related quality of life but did not report these results. No study measured radiographic progression.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Low-quality evidence suggests that low-dose (15 mg or less) oral methotrexate might be slightly more effective than placebo when taken for six months; however we are uncertain if it is more harmful. Effects of methotrexate on health-related quality of life, radiographic progression, enthesitis, dactylitis, and fatigue; its benefits beyond six months; and effects of higher-dose methotrexate have not been measured or reported in a randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30656673
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012722.pub2
pmc: PMC6353064
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antirheumatic Agents
0
Dermatologic Agents
0
Methotrexate
YL5FZ2Y5U1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
CD012722Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Jun;38(6):727-35
pubmed: 7779114
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Oct;52(10):3279-89
pubmed: 16200601
J Rheumatol. 2016 Feb;43(2):356-61
pubmed: 26669913
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Oct;76(10):1688-1692
pubmed: 28606970
Lancet. 2015 Dec 19;386(10012):2489-98
pubmed: 26433318
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1994;186:116-7
pubmed: 8073808
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Oct;64(10):3150-5
pubmed: 22576997
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Aug;73(8):1549-51
pubmed: 24728329
Br J Rheumatol. 1997 Jan;36(1):86-90
pubmed: 9117183
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 18;1:CD012722
pubmed: 30656673
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Nov;69(11):2151-2161
pubmed: 28805045
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Jul;48(7):570-4
pubmed: 19957798
Arthritis Rheum. 1996 Dec;39(12):2013-20
pubmed: 8961906
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 10;(6):CD000957
pubmed: 24916606
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Apr;65(4):471-7
pubmed: 16096330
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015 Nov 04;8:563-9
pubmed: 26622188
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005 Sep-Oct;23(5 Suppl 39):S188-94
pubmed: 16273806
Arthritis Rheum. 1980 Feb;23(2):137-45
pubmed: 7362664
Lancet. 2015 Sep 19;386(9999):1137-46
pubmed: 26135703
Kobe J Med Sci. 2004 Jan;50(1-2):31-7
pubmed: 15659875
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Feb;65(2):334-42
pubmed: 23044791
Br J Rheumatol. 1991 Aug;30(4):245-50
pubmed: 1863819
Ann Rheum Dis. 1978 Aug;37(4):351-6
pubmed: 356763
Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Feb;62(2):127-32
pubmed: 12525381
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 May 15;59(5):686-91
pubmed: 18438903
Arch Neurol. 1989 Oct;46(10):1121-3
pubmed: 2803071
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Feb;73(2):407-13
pubmed: 23355078
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Aug;65(8):1038-43
pubmed: 16439444
Arthritis Rheum. 1971 Nov-Dec;14(6):706-20
pubmed: 5135791
Dermatologica. 1978;157(4):238-44
pubmed: 357213
Arthritis Rheum. 1984 Apr;27(4):376-81
pubmed: 6712754
J Rheumatol. 2017 Oct;44(10):1522-1528
pubmed: 28148697
J Rheumatol. 2007 May;34(5):1167-70
pubmed: 17477480
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):6-16
pubmed: 23749611
RMD Open. 2015 Apr 28;1(1):e000025
pubmed: 26509055
Curr Med Res Opin. 1977;5(2):141-6
pubmed: 340129
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Apr;66(4):803-12
pubmed: 24757133
Clin Rheumatol. 2008 Jul;27(7):823-6
pubmed: 18030515
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):3-5
pubmed: 24072562
J Rheumatol. 2016 Jun;43(6):1063-7
pubmed: 27134249
Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7(4):R796-806
pubmed: 15987481
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;(5):CD000951
pubmed: 23728635
JAMA. 1964 Sep 7;189:743-7
pubmed: 14174051
J Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;41(2):194-205
pubmed: 24293581
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Sep;68(9):1320-31
pubmed: 26713432
Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Dec;67(12):1787-90
pubmed: 19005158
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Nov 1;108(9):1362-70
pubmed: 21855836
Q J Med. 1987 Feb;62(238):127-41
pubmed: 3659255
Z Rheumatol. 2001 Jun;60(3):156-66
pubmed: 11475603
Arthritis Rheum. 1983 Nov;26(11):1346-53
pubmed: 6639693
Br J Dermatol. 2014 Feb;170(2):274-303
pubmed: 24131260
J Rheumatol. 2005 Sep;32(9):1745-50
pubmed: 16142872
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002 Nov-Dec;20(6 Suppl 28):S76-80
pubmed: 12463453
Arthritis Rheum. 1996 Jan;39(1):34-40
pubmed: 8546736
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Mar;64 Suppl 2:ii14-7
pubmed: 15708927
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Aug;54(8):2665-73
pubmed: 16871531
BMJ. 2015 Mar 13;350:h1269
pubmed: 25770113
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Aug;56(8):2708-14
pubmed: 17665458
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jan;69(1):43-7
pubmed: 19147616
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Apr;52(4):1227-36
pubmed: 15818699
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Jun;64(6):859-64
pubmed: 15528283
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1973;3(1):55-78
pubmed: 4581554
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Nov;69(5):729-735
pubmed: 23981683
J Rheumatol. 2014 Aug;41(8):1670-4
pubmed: 25028377
J Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Dec;21(8):405-10
pubmed: 26406567
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Apr;70(4):712-4
pubmed: 20810394
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Apr;71(4):541-8
pubmed: 21994233
Ter Arkh. 1992;64(5):54-9
pubmed: 1360714
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015 Sep-Oct;33(5 Suppl 93):S82-93
pubmed: 26472658
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
pubmed: 1593914
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 May;68(5):1060-71
pubmed: 26749174
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Feb;26(1):147-56
pubmed: 22424200
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1995 Sep-Oct;13(5):589-93
pubmed: 8575136
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Mar;74(3):480-9
pubmed: 25561362
J Psychosom Res. 1995 Apr;39(3):315-25
pubmed: 7636775
Rheumatol Rehabil. 1977 Nov;16(4):257-9
pubmed: 414343
J Rheumatol. 1997 Mar;24(3):511-7
pubmed: 9058658
Acta Derm Venereol. 2002;82(2):108-13
pubmed: 12125937
Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Jul;43(7):1478-87
pubmed: 10902749
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Dec 16;1:79
pubmed: 14678568
J Rheumatol. 2015 Dec;42(12):2473-9
pubmed: 26523032
Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Apr;46(4):862-73
pubmed: 11953961
Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1977 Jul;18(4):481-91
pubmed: 920239
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Aug 1;56(8):1251-1253
pubmed: 28077693
Br J Dermatol. 2003 Aug;149(2):323-31
pubmed: 12932239
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Apr;60(4):976-86
pubmed: 19333944
Rheumatol Rehabil. 1974 Aug;13(3):120-4
pubmed: 4424794
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Aug;51(8):1368-77
pubmed: 22344575
J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Jan;94(1):41-7
pubmed: 16404468
Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Jan;38(1):44-8
pubmed: 7818570
J Rheumatol. 2000 Jan;27(1):261-3
pubmed: 10648051
J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Apr;94(2):130-6
pubmed: 16636704
Immunopharmacology. 2000 May;47(2-3):259-71
pubmed: 10878293
J Rheumatol. 1995 Dec;22(12):2369-70
pubmed: 8965271
J Rheumatol. 1995 Feb;22(2):241-5
pubmed: 7738945
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Mar;75(3):499-510
pubmed: 26644232
J Rheumatol. 2008 Mar;35(3):472-6
pubmed: 18203324