Mapping the sites of localization of epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) and CFTR in segments of the mammalian epididymis.
Animals
Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator
/ analysis
Epididymis
/ chemistry
Epithelial Cells
/ chemistry
Epithelial Sodium Channels
/ analysis
Fluorescent Antibody Technique
Infertility, Male
/ genetics
Intracellular Space
/ chemistry
Male
Mice
Microscopy, Confocal
Mutation
Rats
Tissue Distribution
Cytoskeleton
Epididymosomes
Ion channels
Spermatozoa
Stereocilia
Journal
Journal of molecular histology
ISSN: 1567-2387
Titre abrégé: J Mol Histol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101193653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
18
10
2018
accepted:
14
01
2019
pubmed:
20
1
2019
medline:
30
4
2019
entrez:
20
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The sperm produced in the seminiferous tubules pass through the rete testis, efferent ducts, and epididymis. The epididymis has three distinct regions known as caput, corpus, and cauda. The transit through the epididymis is an essential process in sperm maturation. The lumen of each epididymal region has a unique fluid composition regulated by many ion channels and transporters in the epithelial cells. The objective of this study was to map the sites of localization of ion channels ENaC and CFTR along the length of the mouse and rat epididymis using confocal microscopic imaging. The integrity of the fine structure of the tissues was verified by fluorescent phalloidin staining of actin filaments visualized by high-resolution confocal microscopy. The 2D and 3D images showed preservation of the stereocilia. Based on these images we determined morphometric parameters of the epithelial cells and ducts. ENaC and CFTR immunofluorescence appeared almost continuously on the apical membrane of caput and in smooth muscle myoid cells. In cauda, CFTR expression was observed continuously in long stretches of epithelium interrupted by clusters of cells that showed no CFTR expression. Similar patterns of localization were observed in both mouse and rat samples. Mutations in the CFTR gene are known to result in male infertility. Based on the widespread presence of ENaC along the epididymis we suggest that mutations in ENaC subunits may also be associated with male infertility. The diverse phenotypes associated with CFTR mutations may be due to malfunction of CFTR at specific subcellular locations in the male reproductive system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30659401
doi: 10.1007/s10735-019-09813-3
pii: 10.1007/s10735-019-09813-3
doi:
Substances chimiques
Epithelial Sodium Channels
0
Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator
126880-72-6
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
141-154Références
Biol Reprod. 2000 Jan;62(1):143-9
pubmed: 10611078
J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1998;53:1-14
pubmed: 10645261
Biol Reprod. 2000 Mar;62(3):755-8
pubmed: 10684820
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2000 May;278(5):C885-94
pubmed: 10794662
Microsc Res Tech. 2003 May 1;61(1):7-17
pubmed: 12672118
Microsc Res Tech. 2003 May 1;61(1):28-38
pubmed: 12672120
Biol Reprod. 2004 Aug;71(2):410-6
pubmed: 15056565
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005 May;62(5):547-53
pubmed: 15853823
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Jun;7(6):426-36
pubmed: 16723978
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 5;104(23):9816-21
pubmed: 17519339
J Biol Chem. 2008 Feb 1;283(5):2986-96
pubmed: 18055461
Annu Rev Physiol. 2009;71:361-79
pubmed: 18928407
Hum Reprod Update. 2009 Mar-Apr;15(2):213-27
pubmed: 19136456
J Biol Chem. 2009 Jul 31;284(31):20447-51
pubmed: 19401469
Annu Rev Biophys. 2011;40:169-86
pubmed: 21314430
J Androl. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):576-86
pubmed: 21441423
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2011 Jul;38(7):403-9
pubmed: 21480944
Acta Histochem. 2012 Sep;114(5):434-47
pubmed: 21906788
Histochem Cell Biol. 2012 Mar;137(3):339-53
pubmed: 22207244
Hum Reprod Update. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):703-13
pubmed: 22709980
J Physiol. 2012 Sep 1;590(17):4209-22
pubmed: 22711960
Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;6(1):3-12
pubmed: 23547930
J Reprod Fertil. 1978 Mar;52(2):333-5
pubmed: 24738
Biol Reprod. 2014 Jul;91(1):11
pubmed: 24876406
Mol Hum Reprod. 2014 Oct;20(10):929-37
pubmed: 25015675
Anim Reprod Sci. 2014 Oct;149(3-4):212-7
pubmed: 25104474
Physiol Rev. 2015 Jan;95(1):297-340
pubmed: 25540145
ISRN Anat. 2012 Dec 02;2013:128921
pubmed: 25969823
Asian J Androl. 2015 Sep-Oct;17(5):720-5
pubmed: 26112481
Mol Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;22(2):69-82
pubmed: 26612782
Gene. 2016 Apr 1;579(2):95-132
pubmed: 26772908
Mol Biol Cell. 2016 Feb 1;27(3):424-33
pubmed: 26823392
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Sep;22(5):574-87
pubmed: 27307387
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 23;6:31794
pubmed: 27549865
FEBS J. 2017 Feb;284(4):525-545
pubmed: 27580245
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017 Jan;74(1):93-115
pubmed: 27714410
Histochem Cell Biol. 2017 Jun;147(6):733-748
pubmed: 28130590
PLoS Genet. 2017 Apr 6;13(4):e1006715
pubmed: 28384194
Gene. 2017 Aug 30;626:282-289
pubmed: 28456595
Reprod Domest Anim. 2017 Oct;52 Suppl 4:12-27
pubmed: 29052330
Andrology. 2018 Jan;6(1):127-135
pubmed: 29216686
J Mol Histol. 2018 Apr;49(2):195-208
pubmed: 29453757
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018 Feb 28;9:59
pubmed: 29541061
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2018 Oct;183:137-141
pubmed: 29885352
J Anat. 1973 Apr;114(Pt 3):347-64
pubmed: 4716139
J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1971 May;13:Suppl 13:39-50
pubmed: 5292800
J Endocrinol. 1978 May;77(2):265-6
pubmed: 566299
Cell Tissue Res. 1983;233(3):523-37
pubmed: 6354463
J Androl. 1983 May-Jun;4(3):197-202
pubmed: 6874561
Biol Reprod. 1980 Dec;23(5):981-7
pubmed: 7470534
Fertil Steril. 1977 Feb;28(2):191-4
pubmed: 832732
Science. 1977 Feb 4;195(4277):492-3
pubmed: 835008
Nat Genet. 1996 Mar;12(3):248-53
pubmed: 8589714
Anat Rec. 1996 May;245(1):57-64
pubmed: 8731041