Nicotine Evoked Currents in Human Primary Sensory Neurons.
Patch clamp
chemosensitive
in vitro
ionotropic
nociceptor
Journal
The journal of pain
ISSN: 1528-8447
Titre abrégé: J Pain
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100898657
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
received:
27
08
2018
revised:
18
12
2018
accepted:
03
01
2019
pubmed:
20
1
2019
medline:
9
9
2020
entrez:
20
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Sensory neuron nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) contribute to pain associated with tissue injury. However, there are marked differences between rats and mice with respect to both the properties and distribution of nAChR currents in sensory neurons. Because both species are used to understand pain signaling in humans, we sought to determine whether the currents present in either species was reflective of those present in human sensory neurons. Neurons from the L4/L5 dorsal root ganglia were obtained from adult male and female organ donors. Nicotine evoked currents were detected in 40 of 47 neurons (85%). In contrast with the naïve mouse, in which almost all nAChR currents are transient, or the rat, in which both mouse-like transient and more slowly activating and inactivating currents are detected, all the currents in human DRG neurons were slow, but slower than those in the rat. Currents were blocked by the nAChR antagonists mecamylamine (30 µmol/L), but not by the TRPA1 selective antagonist HC-030031 (10 µmol/L). Single cell polymerase chain reaction analysis of nicotinic receptor subunit expression in human DRG neurons are consistent with functional data indicating that receptor expression is detected 85 ± 2.1% of neurons assessed (n = 48, from 4 donors). The most prevalent coexpression pattern was α3/β2 (95 ± 4% of neurons with subunits), but α7 subunits were detected in 70 ± 3.4% of neurons. These results suggest that there are not only species differences in the sensory neuron distribution of nAChR currents between rodent and human, but that the subunit composition of the channel underlying human nAChR currents may be different from those in the mouse or rat. PERSPECTIVE: The properties and distribution of nicotine evoked currents in human sensory neurons were markedly different from those previously observed in mice and rats. These observations add additional support to the suggestion that human sensory neurons may be an essential screening tool for those considering moving novel therapeutics targeting primary afferents into clinical trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30659887
pii: S1526-5900(18)30485-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.01.005
pmc: PMC6626579
mid: NIHMS1521074
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Receptors, Nicotinic
0
Nicotine
6M3C89ZY6R
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
810-818Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK107966
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS083347
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : T32 NS073548
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 the American Pain Society. All rights reserved.
Références
Pain. 2000 May;86(1-2):113-8
pubmed: 10779668
J Neurosci. 2001 May 1;21(9):3295-302
pubmed: 11312314
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Oct;86(4):1773-82
pubmed: 11600638
Mol Pharmacol. 2002 Jun;61(6):1416-22
pubmed: 12021403
Auton Neurosci. 2004 Jun 30;113(1-2):32-42
pubmed: 15296793
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Mar;93(3):1358-71
pubmed: 15483069
J Physiol. 2005 May 15;565(Pt 1):219-28
pubmed: 15760934
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2005 Oct;14(10):1191-8
pubmed: 16185161
Cell Calcium. 2006 Apr;39(4):349-55
pubmed: 16451809
J Mol Neurosci. 2006;30(1-2):55-6
pubmed: 17192625
Pain. 2009 Dec;146(3):245-52
pubmed: 19632048
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Oct;12(10):1293-9
pubmed: 19749751
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010 Sep;299(3):G761-8
pubmed: 20595621
Dig Dis Sci. 1990 Jul;35(7):827-32
pubmed: 2194767
FASEB J. 2012 Feb;26(2):917-26
pubmed: 22024738
AAPS J. 2012 Jun;14(2):168-75
pubmed: 22328206
J Pain. 2012 Dec;13(12):1162-71
pubmed: 23182225
Front Cell Neurosci. 2013 Nov 28;7:225
pubmed: 24348328
Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(38):6042-7
pubmed: 24641230
Mol Pain. 2014 May 22;10:31
pubmed: 24886596
J Pain. 2014 Dec;15(12):1338-1359
pubmed: 25281809
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Jan;18(1):145-53
pubmed: 25420068
Neuroscience. 2015 Jan 22;284:483-99
pubmed: 25453771
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2015 Feb;213(2):462-71
pubmed: 25491757
Neuropharmacology. 2015 May;92:135-45
pubmed: 25595102
Neuroscience. 2015 Dec 3;310:401-9
pubmed: 26415765
Elife. 2017 May 16;6:
pubmed: 28508747
Pain. 2018 Jul;159(7):1325-1345
pubmed: 29561359
Cell. 2018 Aug 9;174(4):999-1014.e22
pubmed: 30096314
Eur J Pharmacol. 1995 Aug 15;290(3):237-46
pubmed: 7589218
J Neurophysiol. 1993 Jul;70(1):397-405
pubmed: 8103089
Ann Pharmacother. 1997 Jul-Aug;31(7-8):907-13
pubmed: 9220055
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998 Feb;284(2):777-89
pubmed: 9454827
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998 May;285(2):777-86
pubmed: 9580626
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Nov 30;855:828-30
pubmed: 9929695