Nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma (IFCT-1501 MAPS2): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, non-comparative, phase 2 trial.


Journal

The Lancet. Oncology
ISSN: 1474-5488
Titre abrégé: Lancet Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100957246

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
received: 02 08 2018
revised: 08 10 2018
accepted: 10 10 2018
pubmed: 21 1 2019
medline: 12 6 2020
entrez: 21 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is no recommended therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma that has progressed after first-line pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy. Disease control has been less than 30% in all previous studies of second-line drugs. Preliminary results have suggested that anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody could be efficacious in these patients. We thus aimed to prospectively assess the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody alone or in combination with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protein 4 (CTLA-4) antibody in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. This multicentre randomised, non-comparative, open-label, phase 2 trial was done at 21 hospitals in France. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, histologically proven malignant pleural mesothelioma progressing after first-line or second-line pemetrexed and platinum-based treatments, measurable disease by CT, and life expectancy greater than 12 weeks. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg bodyweight) every 2 weeks, or intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) plus intravenous ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks), given until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Central randomisation was stratified by histology (epithelioid vs non-epithelioid), treatment line (second line vs third line), and chemosensitivity to previous treatment (progression ≥3 months vs <3 months after pemetrexed treatment) and used a minimisation method with a 0·8 random factor. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved 12-week disease control, assessed by masked independent central review; the primary endpoint would be met if disease control was achieved in at least 40% of patients. The primary endpoint was assessed in the first 108 eligible patients. Efficacy analyses were also done in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of their assigned treatment. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02716272. Between March 24 and August 25, 2016, 125 eligible patients were recruited and assigned to either nivolumab (n=63) or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=62). In the first 108 eligible patients, 12-week disease control was achieved by 24 (44%; 95% CI 31-58) of 54 patients in the nivolumab group and 27 (50%; 37-63) of 54 patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group. In the intention-to-treat population, 12-week disease control was achieved by 25 (40%; 28-52) of 63 patients in the nivolumab group and 32 (52%; 39-64) of 62 patients in the combination group. Nine (14%) of 63 patients in the nivolumab group and 16 (26%) of 61 patients in the combination group had grade 3-4 toxicities. The most frequent grade 3 adverse events were asthenia (one [2%] in the nivolumab group vs three [5%] in the combination group), asymptomatic increase in aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase (none vs four [7%] of each), and asymptomatic lipase increase (two [3%] vs one [2%]). No patients had toxicities leading to death in the nivolumab group, whereas three (5%) of 62 in the combination group did (one fulminant hepatitis, one encephalitis, and one acute kidney failure). Anti-PD-1 nivolumab monotherapy or nivolumab plus anti-CTLA-4 ipilimumab combination therapy both showed promising activity in relapsed patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, without unexpected toxicity. These regimens require confirmation in larger clinical trials. French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
There is no recommended therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma that has progressed after first-line pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy. Disease control has been less than 30% in all previous studies of second-line drugs. Preliminary results have suggested that anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody could be efficacious in these patients. We thus aimed to prospectively assess the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody alone or in combination with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protein 4 (CTLA-4) antibody in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.
METHODS
This multicentre randomised, non-comparative, open-label, phase 2 trial was done at 21 hospitals in France. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, histologically proven malignant pleural mesothelioma progressing after first-line or second-line pemetrexed and platinum-based treatments, measurable disease by CT, and life expectancy greater than 12 weeks. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg bodyweight) every 2 weeks, or intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) plus intravenous ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks), given until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Central randomisation was stratified by histology (epithelioid vs non-epithelioid), treatment line (second line vs third line), and chemosensitivity to previous treatment (progression ≥3 months vs <3 months after pemetrexed treatment) and used a minimisation method with a 0·8 random factor. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved 12-week disease control, assessed by masked independent central review; the primary endpoint would be met if disease control was achieved in at least 40% of patients. The primary endpoint was assessed in the first 108 eligible patients. Efficacy analyses were also done in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of their assigned treatment. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02716272.
FINDINGS
Between March 24 and August 25, 2016, 125 eligible patients were recruited and assigned to either nivolumab (n=63) or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=62). In the first 108 eligible patients, 12-week disease control was achieved by 24 (44%; 95% CI 31-58) of 54 patients in the nivolumab group and 27 (50%; 37-63) of 54 patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group. In the intention-to-treat population, 12-week disease control was achieved by 25 (40%; 28-52) of 63 patients in the nivolumab group and 32 (52%; 39-64) of 62 patients in the combination group. Nine (14%) of 63 patients in the nivolumab group and 16 (26%) of 61 patients in the combination group had grade 3-4 toxicities. The most frequent grade 3 adverse events were asthenia (one [2%] in the nivolumab group vs three [5%] in the combination group), asymptomatic increase in aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase (none vs four [7%] of each), and asymptomatic lipase increase (two [3%] vs one [2%]). No patients had toxicities leading to death in the nivolumab group, whereas three (5%) of 62 in the combination group did (one fulminant hepatitis, one encephalitis, and one acute kidney failure).
INTERPRETATION
Anti-PD-1 nivolumab monotherapy or nivolumab plus anti-CTLA-4 ipilimumab combination therapy both showed promising activity in relapsed patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, without unexpected toxicity. These regimens require confirmation in larger clinical trials.
FUNDING
French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30660609
pii: S1470-2045(18)30765-4
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30765-4
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological 0
Ipilimumab 0
Nivolumab 31YO63LBSN

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02716272']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

239-253

Investigateurs

Didier Debieuvre (D)
Sandrine Hiret (S)
Jacques Cadranel (J)
Séverine Fraboulet-Moreau (S)
Delphine Carmier (D)

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Arnaud Scherpereel (A)

Department of Pulmonary and Thoracic Oncology, University of Lille, University Hospital (CHU) of Lille, Lille, France; French National Network of Clinical Expert Centers for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Management (MESOCLIN), Lille, France. Electronic address: arnaud.scherpereel@chru-lille.fr.

Julien Mazieres (J)

Department of Pneumology, University Hospital of Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.

Laurent Greillier (L)

Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations Department, Aix Marseille University, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.

Sylvie Lantuejoul (S)

Department of BioPathology, MESOPATH, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.

Pascal Dô (P)

Department of Pneumology, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Baclesse, Caen, France.

Olivier Bylicki (O)

Department of Pneumology, Hôpital d'instruction des Armées, Percy, Clamart, France.

Isabelle Monnet (I)

Department of Pneumology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France.

Romain Corre (R)

Department of Pneumology, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France.

Clarisse Audigier-Valette (C)

Department of Pneumology, Hôpital Sainte-Musse, Toulon, France.

Myriam Locatelli-Sanchez (M)

Department of Pneumology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud Pierre-Bénite, Lyon, France.

Olivier Molinier (O)

Department of Pneumology, Le Mans Regional Hospital, Le Mans, France.

Florian Guisier (F)

Department of Pneumology, University Hospital of Rouen, Rouen, France.

Thierry Urban (T)

Department of Pneumology, University Hospital of CHU Angers, Angers, France.

Catherine Ligeza-Poisson (C)

Department of Medical Oncology, Clinique Mutualiste de l'Estuaire, Saint-Nazaire, France.

David Planchard (D)

Department of Thoracic Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Elodie Amour (E)

Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique IFCT, Paris, France.

Franck Morin (F)

Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique IFCT, Paris, France.

Denis Moro-Sibilot (D)

Department of Pneumology, University Hospital of Grenoble, Grenoble, France.

Gérard Zalcman (G)

University Hospital Bichat Claude Bernard, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Diderot University Paris, Paris, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH