Gender differences in how physicians access and process information.
Cognitive analysis
Decision-making
Gender
Simulation
Journal
Gynecologic oncology reports
ISSN: 2352-5789
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Oncol Rep
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101652231
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
13
08
2018
revised:
18
12
2018
accepted:
22
12
2018
entrez:
22
1
2019
pubmed:
22
1
2019
medline:
22
1
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is an absence of information on how physicians make surgical decisions, and on the effect of gender on the processing of information. A novel web based decision-matrix software was designed to trace experimentally the process of decision making in medical situations. The scenarios included a crisis and non-crisis simulation for endometrial cancer surgery. Gynecologic oncologists, fellows, and residents (42 male and 42 female) in Canada participated in this experiment. Overall, male physicians used more heuristics, whereas female physicians were more comprehensive in accessing clinical information (p < 0.03), utilized alternative-based acquisition processes in the non-crisis scenario (p = 0.01), were less likely to consider procedure-related costs (p = 0.04), and overall allocated more time to evaluate the information (p < 0.01). Further experiments leading to a better understanding of the cognitive processes involved in medical decision making could influence education and training and impact on patient outcome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30662932
doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2018.12.008
pii: S2352-5789(18)30119-X
pmc: PMC6325067
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
50-53Références
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003 Jan-Feb;12(1):73-80
pubmed: 12639371
J R Soc Med. 2010 May;103(5):178-87
pubmed: 20436026
Can Fam Physician. 1991 Jan;37:72-81
pubmed: 21234080
Am J Public Health. 1990 Mar;80(3):300-4
pubmed: 2305909
Med Decis Making. 2015 May;35(4):539-57
pubmed: 25145577
Med Decis Making. 2015 Jan;35(1):114-31
pubmed: 25351843
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):206-213
pubmed: 27992617
Can Med Assoc J. 1966 Jun 4;94(23):1223-7
pubmed: 5939556