Telehealth Therapy Effects of Nurses and Mental Health Professionals From 2 Randomized Controlled Trials for Chronic Back Pain.


Journal

The Clinical journal of pain
ISSN: 1536-5409
Titre abrégé: Clin J Pain
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8507389

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 22 1 2019
medline: 6 8 2020
entrez: 22 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To compare the efficacy of mental health professional versus primary care nurse-delivered telehealth cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and supportive care (SC) treatments for chronic low back pain, using data from 2 separate randomized controlled trials. Both trials were completed in the same hospital and used the same study design, research team, and outcome measures. Participants from Study 1 (Mental Health Professional Study) (N=66; 2007 to 2011) and Study 2 (Nursing Study) (N=61; 2012 to 2016) were patients with chronic low back pain (≥4/10 intensity) randomized to either an 8-week CBT or an SC telehealth condition matched for contact frequency, format, and time. Participants completed validated measures of improvement in back pain disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ]), pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]), depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory 2 [BDI-2]), pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS]), and overall improvement (Global Clinical Impressions [GCI]). Intent-to-treat analyses at posttreatment showed that scores on the RMDQ (Cohen d=0.33 to 0.55), NRS (d=0.45 to 0.90), PCS (d=0.21 to 0.41), and GCI (18.5% to 39.1%) improved significantly in both studies and in both treatments from pretreatment to posttreatment. Changes in BDI scores were inconsistent (d=-0.06 to 0.51). The analyses revealed no significant differences in treatment efficacy between the trained nurse versus the mental health professionals on the RMDQ, NRS, PCS, or GCI measures (P>0.20). Results from these clinical trials suggest that the benefits of home-based, telehealth-delivered CBT and SC treatments for chronic back pain were comparable when delivered by a primary care nurse or mental health professional.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30664550
doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000678
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

295-303

Auteurs

Jamie Gannon (J)

VA San Diego Healthcare System.
University of California, San Diego, CA.

Joseph H Atkinson (JH)

VA San Diego Healthcare System.
University of California, San Diego, CA.

Tatiana Chircop-Rollick (T)

University of California, San Diego, CA.

John D'Andrea (J)

VA San Diego Healthcare System.
University of California, San Diego, CA.

Steven Garfin (S)

University of California, San Diego, CA.

Shetal Patel (S)

VA San Diego Healthcare System.

Donald B Penzien (DB)

The University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.

Mark Wallace (M)

University of California, San Diego, CA.

Anne L Weickgenant (AL)

VA San Diego Healthcare System.

Mark Slater (M)

Scottsdale Clinical Research Institute at Scottsdale Healthcare, Scottsdale, AZ.

Rachael Holloway (R)

VA San Diego Healthcare System.

Thomas Rutledge (T)

VA San Diego Healthcare System.
University of California, San Diego, CA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH