Genetic analysis of subsequent second primary malignant neoplasms in long-term pancreatic cancer survivors suggests new potential hereditary genetic alterations.
hereditary cancer genes
long-term survivors
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
second primary neoplasms
subsequent malignant neoplasm
surgical treatment
Journal
Cancer management and research
ISSN: 1179-1322
Titre abrégé: Cancer Manag Res
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101512700
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
entrez:
23
1
2019
pubmed:
23
1
2019
medline:
23
1
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The principal aim of this report was to study second primary malignant neoplasms (SMNs) in long-term survivors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with regard to the germline genetic background. A total of 118 PDAC patients after a curative-intent surgery who were treated between 2006 and 2011 were analyzed. Of the 22 patients surviving for >5 years, six went on to develop SMNs. A genetic analysis of 219 hereditary cancer-predisposition and candidate genes was performed by targeted next-generation sequencing in germline DNA from 20 of these patients. Of all the radically resected PDAC patients, six patients went on to subsequently develop SMNs, which accounted for 27% of the long-term survivors. The median time to diagnosis of SMNs, which included two cases of rectal cancer, and one case each of prostate cancer, malignant melanoma, breast cancer, and urinary bladder cancer, was 52.5 months. At the time of analysis, none of these patients had died as a result of PDAC progression. We identified four carriers of germline pathogenic mutations in 20 analyzed long-term survivors. One carrier of the This retrospective analysis indicates that SMNs in PDAC survivors are an important clinical problem and may be more common than has been acknowledged to be the case. In patients with good performance status, surgical therapy should be considered, as the SMNs often have a favorable prognosis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The principal aim of this report was to study second primary malignant neoplasms (SMNs) in long-term survivors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with regard to the germline genetic background.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
METHODS
A total of 118 PDAC patients after a curative-intent surgery who were treated between 2006 and 2011 were analyzed. Of the 22 patients surviving for >5 years, six went on to develop SMNs. A genetic analysis of 219 hereditary cancer-predisposition and candidate genes was performed by targeted next-generation sequencing in germline DNA from 20 of these patients.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of all the radically resected PDAC patients, six patients went on to subsequently develop SMNs, which accounted for 27% of the long-term survivors. The median time to diagnosis of SMNs, which included two cases of rectal cancer, and one case each of prostate cancer, malignant melanoma, breast cancer, and urinary bladder cancer, was 52.5 months. At the time of analysis, none of these patients had died as a result of PDAC progression. We identified four carriers of germline pathogenic mutations in 20 analyzed long-term survivors. One carrier of the
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This retrospective analysis indicates that SMNs in PDAC survivors are an important clinical problem and may be more common than has been acknowledged to be the case. In patients with good performance status, surgical therapy should be considered, as the SMNs often have a favorable prognosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30666157
doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S185352
pii: cmar-11-599
pmc: PMC6331079
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
599-609Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure A grant from Palacky University was awarded to TZ (IGA_LF_2018_010), Charles University Projects (UNCE/MED/006) was awarded to PSo, and PROGRES grants (Q28/LF1 and SVV 260367) were awarded to PZ, KL, and MB. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Int J Epidemiol. 2000 Dec;29(6):999-1003
pubmed: 11101540
Ann Ital Chir. 2005 Sep-Oct;76(5):467-72
pubmed: 16696221
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 May;204(5):803-13; discussion 813-4
pubmed: 17481488
Ann Surg. 2008 Mar;247(3):456-62
pubmed: 18376190
Cancer J. 2008 Nov-Dec;14(6):429-34
pubmed: 19060610
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2009;40(1-2):46-50
pubmed: 19728180
Carcinogenesis. 1990 Sep;11(9):1527-30
pubmed: 1976046
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Sep;38(16):e164
pubmed: 20601685
Cancer Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;34(5):656-8
pubmed: 20643596
Pancreas. 2012 Mar;41(2):212-7
pubmed: 21934549
Zentralbl Chir. 2012 Dec;137(6):565-74
pubmed: 22426967
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Jul-Oct;37(4-5 Suppl 1):1-152
pubmed: 24259384
Cancer Epidemiol. 2014 Feb;38(1):28-34
pubmed: 24315848
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Apr;22(4):1185-9
pubmed: 25384699
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Jan;25(1):207-11
pubmed: 26483394
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 27;10(10):e0140819
pubmed: 26506619
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2016 Jun;160(2):280-6
pubmed: 27029600
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 10;35(20):2288-2298
pubmed: 28530852
Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2017 Jul 11;94:10.12.1-10.12.23
pubmed: 28696559
Genet Med. 2018 Jan;20(1):119-127
pubmed: 28726808
Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jul;50(3):917-925
pubmed: 29020732
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0195761
pubmed: 29649263
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jun 27;18(1):697
pubmed: 29945567
Genet Med. 2019 Jan;21(1):213-223
pubmed: 29961768