Influence of the initial level of consciousness on early, goal-directed mobilization: a post hoc analysis.
Aged
Austria
/ epidemiology
Brain Injuries
/ physiopathology
Consciousness Disorders
/ classification
Critical Care
/ methods
Early Ambulation
/ methods
Female
Germany
/ epidemiology
Glasgow Coma Scale
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Intensive Care Units
/ organization & administration
Length of Stay
/ statistics & numerical data
Logistic Models
Male
Massachusetts
/ epidemiology
Middle Aged
Patient Care Planning
Treatment Outcome
Consciousness
Critical care
Delirium
Early mobilization
Early rehabilitation
Functional status
Neurocritical care
Journal
Intensive care medicine
ISSN: 1432-1238
Titre abrégé: Intensive Care Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7704851
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
received:
23
11
2018
accepted:
09
01
2019
pubmed:
23
1
2019
medline:
20
12
2019
entrez:
23
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Early mobilization within 72 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission improves functional status at hospital discharge. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of early, goal-directed mobilization in critically ill patients across a broad spectrum of initial consciousness levels. Post hoc analysis of the international, randomized, controlled, outcome-assessor blinded SOMS trial conducted 2011-2015. Randomization was stratified according to the immediate post-injury Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (≤ 8 or > 8). Patients received either SOMS-guided mobility treatment with a facilitator or standard care. We used general linear models to test the hypothesis that immediate post-randomization GCS modulates the intervention effects on functional independence at hospital discharge. Two hundred patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The significant effect of early, goal-directed mobilization was consistent across levels of GCS without evidence of effect modification, for the primary outcome functional independence at hospital discharge (p = 0.53 for interaction), as well as average achieved mobility level during ICU stay (mean achieved SOMS level) and functional status at hospital discharge measured with the functional independence measure. In patients with low GCS, delay to first mobilization therapy was longer (0.7 ± 0.2 days vs. 0.2 ± 0.1 days, p = 0.008), but early, goal-directed mobilization compared with standard care significantly increased functional independence at hospital discharge in this subgroup of patients with immediate post-randomization GCS ≤ 8 (OR 3.67; 95% CI 1.02-13.14; p = 0.046). This post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial suggests that early, goal-directed mobilization in patients with an impaired initial conscious state (GCS ≤ 8) is not harmful but effective.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30666366
doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05528-x
pii: 10.1007/s00134-019-05528-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
201-210Subventions
Organisme : Jeff and Judy Buzen
ID : 222302
Pays : International
Références
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(3):207-13
pubmed: 24787236
Crit Care. 2015 Feb 26;19:81
pubmed: 25715872
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018 Apr;31(2):144-150
pubmed: 29351145
J Neurosurg. 2012 Jun;116(6):1379-88
pubmed: 22462507
J Trauma. 1994 Dec;37(6):962-8
pubmed: 7996612
JAMA. 2001 Dec 5;286(21):2703-10
pubmed: 11730446
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 May 15;193(10):1101-10
pubmed: 26651376
Int J Rehabil Res. 2013 Sep;36(3):260-7
pubmed: 23470551
JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2694-702
pubmed: 27367766
J Crit Care. 2015 Dec;30(6):1251-7
pubmed: 26315654
Thorax. 2018 Mar;73(3):213-221
pubmed: 28780504
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 16;10:CD006187
pubmed: 30321906
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000 Mar;20(3):478-84
pubmed: 10724112
Emerg Med J. 2011 Jun;28(6):486-90
pubmed: 20943845
J Neurotrauma. 2002 Jul;19(7):869-74
pubmed: 12184856
Crit Care Med. 2012 Apr;40(4):1122-8
pubmed: 22067629
Phys Ther. 2012 Dec;92(12):1546-55
pubmed: 22976446
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 May;27(5):1326-1337
pubmed: 29373228
J Crit Care. 2010 Jun;25(2):254-62
pubmed: 19942399
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(2):105-12
pubmed: 20450246
Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5
pubmed: 14258950
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 19;3(8):e003262
pubmed: 23959756
Lancet. 2009 May 30;373(9678):1874-82
pubmed: 19446324
Hum Mov Sci. 2002 Dec;21(5-6):533-40
pubmed: 12620710
Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29
pubmed: 3928249
J Crit Care. 2016 Apr;32:201-6
pubmed: 26857328
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jul;82(7):526-36
pubmed: 12819540
J Crit Care. 1996 Dec;11(4):176-9
pubmed: 8977993
Lancet. 2015 Jul 4;386(9988):46-55
pubmed: 25892679
Development. 2012 Aug;139(16):2845-56
pubmed: 22833472
Arch Surg. 1991 Oct;126(10):1237-41; discussion 1242
pubmed: 1929824
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jul;22(7):707-10
pubmed: 8844239
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Aug;13(8):844-54
pubmed: 25030516
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Jan;26(1):149-56
pubmed: 24567696
Brain Inj. 2013;27(3):293-300
pubmed: 23252405
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44
pubmed: 12421743
Neuron. 2015 Mar 4;85(5):1117-31
pubmed: 25741731
J Crit Care. 2018 Apr;44:407-412
pubmed: 29331668
PM R. 2011 Apr;3(4):307-13
pubmed: 21497316
Lancet. 2016 Oct 1;388(10052):1377-1388
pubmed: 27707496