Quality of life in bladder cancer patients receiving medical oncological treatment; a systematic review of the literature.

Bladder cancer Chemotherapy Muscle-invasive bladder cancer Quality of life Urothelial cancer

Journal

Health and quality of life outcomes
ISSN: 1477-7525
Titre abrégé: Health Qual Life Outcomes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101153626

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Jan 2019
Historique:
received: 23 07 2018
accepted: 20 12 2018
entrez: 24 1 2019
pubmed: 24 1 2019
medline: 15 2 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Previous quality of life (QoL) literature in bladder cancer (BC) patients has focused on finding the preferred urinary diversion while little is known about the QoL of patients in medical oncological treatment (MOT). We performed a systematic review to assess the existing literature on QoL in patients with muscle-invasive BC (MIBC) undergoing MOT. A systematic search of Pubmed and Embase was performed. Inclusion criteria were studies containing QoL data for patients undergoing chemo- and/or radiotherapy. We extracted all QoL scorings at different time intervals and on the six most prevalent domains: overall QoL, urinary, bowel sexual symptoms, pain and fatigue. The study was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and GRADE was used to rate the quality of evidence from the included studies. Of 208 papers reviewed, 21 papers were included. Twenty-one different QoL instruments were applied. The only data on QoL during chemotherapy was from patients in clinical trials investigating new treatments. No studies were found for patients in neoadjuvant treatment. The level of evidence at each time point was graded as very low to moderate. From the studies included the overall QoL seemed inversely related to the organ-specific impairment from sexual and urinary symptoms and increased with decreasing organ-specific symptoms for long term survivors > 6 months after treatment. Collection of data on QoL from patients with MIBC disease undergoing MOT has been sparse and diverse. The present data can act as a summary but prompts for more prospective collection of QoL data from BC patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Previous quality of life (QoL) literature in bladder cancer (BC) patients has focused on finding the preferred urinary diversion while little is known about the QoL of patients in medical oncological treatment (MOT). We performed a systematic review to assess the existing literature on QoL in patients with muscle-invasive BC (MIBC) undergoing MOT.
METHODS METHODS
A systematic search of Pubmed and Embase was performed. Inclusion criteria were studies containing QoL data for patients undergoing chemo- and/or radiotherapy. We extracted all QoL scorings at different time intervals and on the six most prevalent domains: overall QoL, urinary, bowel sexual symptoms, pain and fatigue. The study was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and GRADE was used to rate the quality of evidence from the included studies.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 208 papers reviewed, 21 papers were included. Twenty-one different QoL instruments were applied. The only data on QoL during chemotherapy was from patients in clinical trials investigating new treatments. No studies were found for patients in neoadjuvant treatment. The level of evidence at each time point was graded as very low to moderate. From the studies included the overall QoL seemed inversely related to the organ-specific impairment from sexual and urinary symptoms and increased with decreasing organ-specific symptoms for long term survivors > 6 months after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Collection of data on QoL from patients with MIBC disease undergoing MOT has been sparse and diverse. The present data can act as a summary but prompts for more prospective collection of QoL data from BC patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30670040
doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1077-6
pii: 10.1186/s12955-018-1077-6
pmc: PMC6341712
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

20

Subventions

Organisme : Kræftens Bekæmpelse
ID : R150-A10114

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Références

World J Urol. 1999 Aug;17(4):219-24
pubmed: 10460404
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Sep;18(17):3068-77
pubmed: 11001674
Onkologie. 2002 Feb;25(1):47-52
pubmed: 11893883
Radiother Oncol. 2002 Feb;62(2):215-25
pubmed: 11937249
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Feb 15;21(4):673-8
pubmed: 12586805
BJU Int. 2003 Mar;91(4):325-30; discussion 330
pubmed: 12603405
Int J Urol. 2003 Aug;10(8):423-9
pubmed: 12887363
Qual Life Res. 2003 Sep;12(6):675-88
pubmed: 14516177
J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):1772-6
pubmed: 14532773
Urology. 2004 Jul;64(1):69-73
pubmed: 15245938
Radiother Oncol. 2004 Aug;72(2):139-45
pubmed: 15297133
J Urol. 2005 Apr;173(4):1318-22
pubmed: 15758789
Urol Oncol. 2005 May-Jun;23(3):201-7
pubmed: 15907722
Cancer. 2006 Jun 1;106(11):2355-62
pubmed: 16649218
Cancer. 2007 May 1;109(9):1756-62
pubmed: 17366596
Int J Urol. 2008 May;15(5):403-6
pubmed: 18384578
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2008 May;6(5):448-55
pubmed: 18492460
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2009 Aug;7(2):E28-33
pubmed: 19692319
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jan 1;79(1):172-8
pubmed: 20385453
Psychooncology. 2012 May;21(5):505-14
pubmed: 21308859
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan 10;30(2):191-9
pubmed: 22162575
Qual Life Res. 2013 Mar;22(2):309-15
pubmed: 22461137
J Pak Med Assoc. 2012 Sep;62(9):905-9
pubmed: 23139973
Support Care Cancer. 2013 May;21(5):1383-93
pubmed: 23238655
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Jan;22(1):163-72
pubmed: 24018909
Curr Opin Urol. 2014 May;24(3):311-7
pubmed: 24637318
J Urol. 2014 Sep;192(3):690-5
pubmed: 24704007
Qual Life Res. 2014 Oct;23(8):2153-67
pubmed: 24729055
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 20;34(6):557-65
pubmed: 26644527
Qual Life Res. 2016 Sep;25(9):2307-14
pubmed: 26984467
Urology. 2016 Jul;93:22-6
pubmed: 27015941
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Dec 1;96(5):1028-1036
pubmed: 27727064
Psychooncology. 2017 Oct;26(10):1569-1575
pubmed: 27935142
Qual Life Res. 2017 Mar;26(3):625-634
pubmed: 28050795
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Sep 1;109(9):
pubmed: 28423407
BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5):639-650
pubmed: 28453896
JAMA. 2017 Jul 11;318(2):197-198
pubmed: 28586821
Br J Cancer. 2018 May;118(11):1518-1528
pubmed: 29755116
Eur J Surg Oncol. 1998 Oct;24(5):375-8
pubmed: 9800963

Auteurs

G A Taarnhøj (GA)

Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, section 5073, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.

C Johansen (C)

Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, section 5073, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Unit of Survivorship, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.

H Pappot (H)

Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, section 5073, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. helle.pappot@regionh.dk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH