Associations in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes between clinicopathological factors and clinical outcomes in estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 negative breast cancer.
breast cancer
estrogen receptor positive
human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 negative
prognosis
tumor infiltrating lymphocytes
Journal
Oncology letters
ISSN: 1792-1074
Titre abrégé: Oncol Lett
Pays: Greece
ID NLM: 101531236
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
17
06
2018
accepted:
29
11
2018
entrez:
25
1
2019
pubmed:
25
1
2019
medline:
25
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The value of assessing tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in estrogen receptor (ER) positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) negative breast cancer has yet to be determined. In the present study, a total of 184 cases with early distant recurrence detected within 5 years following the primary operation, 134 with late distant recurrence diagnosed following 5 years or longer and 321 controls without recurrence for >10 years following starting the initial treatment for ER-positive/HER2 negative breast cancer, registered in 9 institutions, were analyzed. The distributions of TILs and their clinical relevance were investigated. TIL distributions did not differ significantly among the early, late and no recurrence groups, employing a 30% cut-off point as a dichotomous variable. In those who had received adjuvant chemotherapy as well as endocrine therapy, a trend toward higher TIL proportions was detected when the early recurrence group was compared with the no recurrence group employing the 30% cut-off point (P=0.064). The TIL distributions were significantly associated with nodal metastasis (P=0.004), ER status (P=0.045), progesterone receptor (PgR) status (P=0.002), tumor grade (P=0.021), and the Ki67 labeling index (LI) (P=0.002) in the no recurrence group and with the Ki67 LI in the recurrence groups (P=0.002 in early recurrence group, P=0.023 in late recurrence group). High TIL distributions also predicted shorter survival time following the detection of recurrence (P=0.026). However, these prognostic interactions were not significant in multivariate analysis (P=0.200). The present retrospective study demonstrated no significant interaction between TIL proportions and the timing of recurrence. However, higher TIL proportions were observed in breast cancer patients with aggressive biological phenotypes, which tended to be more responsive to chemotherapy. The clinical relevance of stromal TILs for identifying patients who would likely benefit from additional therapies merits further investigation in a larger patient population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30675282
doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9853
pii: OL-0-0-9853
pmc: PMC6341802
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2177-2186Références
Clin Cancer Res. 2001 Oct;7(10):3025-30
pubmed: 11595690
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Aug 15;11(16):5678-85
pubmed: 16115903
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;28(1):105-13
pubmed: 19917869
Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):390-2
pubmed: 22152852
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar 1;31(7):860-7
pubmed: 23341518
Oncoimmunology. 2013 Jul 1;2(7):e24720
pubmed: 24073365
Breast. 2013 Aug;22 Suppl 2:S92-5
pubmed: 24074801
Ann Oncol. 2014 Mar;25(3):611-8
pubmed: 24401929
Ann Oncol. 2014 Aug;25(8):1544-50
pubmed: 24608200
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):2959-66
pubmed: 25071121
Ann Oncol. 2015 Feb;26(2):259-71
pubmed: 25214542
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 20;33(9):983-91
pubmed: 25534375
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 10;33(11):1297-8
pubmed: 25753438
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jul;1(4):448-54
pubmed: 26181252
Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Sep 22;17(1):131
pubmed: 26395345
Breast Cancer. 2016 Nov;23(6):830-843
pubmed: 26467036
Oncotarget. 2016 Jan 26;7(4):5074-87
pubmed: 26506242
Pathol Int. 2015 Dec;65(12):644-51
pubmed: 26530981
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2016 Apr 05;10(Suppl 1):31-9
pubmed: 27081325
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Dec 1;22(23):5747-5754
pubmed: 27189162
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jul;158(1):1-9
pubmed: 27260189
Mod Pathol. 2016 Oct;29(10):1155-64
pubmed: 27363491
Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Jul 02;18(1):73
pubmed: 27368476
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jul;158(2):323-31
pubmed: 27372069
Breast Cancer. 2017 May;24(3):473-482
pubmed: 27628678
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 29;11(9):e0163138
pubmed: 27685159
World J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 10;7(5):387-394
pubmed: 27777881
Cancer Med. 2016 Dec;5(12):3586-3587
pubmed: 27781408
Oncoimmunology. 2016 Aug 18;5(10):e1218106
pubmed: 27853639
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Feb;161(3):409-420
pubmed: 27913931
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Feb;162(1):19-30
pubmed: 28058578
Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 21;8(8):14003-14016
pubmed: 28122328
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;43(7):1258-1264
pubmed: 28214052
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Feb 21;18(2):
pubmed: 28230773
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jun;163(2):295-302
pubmed: 28289852
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017 Jul;36(7):1522-1532
pubmed: 28328502
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan;167(1):39-47
pubmed: 28905250
Cancer Immunol Res. 2017 Nov;5(11):1016-1028
pubmed: 28924054
Hum Pathol. 2017 Nov;69:110-117
pubmed: 28993275
Semin Cancer Biol. 2018 Oct;52(Pt 2):16-25
pubmed: 29024776
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jan 11;4(1):e173470
pubmed: 29075751
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Feb;168(1):135-145
pubmed: 29168063
Acta Oncol. 2018 Jan;57(1):74-82
pubmed: 29168430
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Feb;168(1):29-34
pubmed: 29230662
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):40-50
pubmed: 29233559
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;25(4):937-946
pubmed: 29330719
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 May 15;:null
pubmed: 29766362
Semin Cancer Biol. 2018 Oct;52(Pt 2):151-157
pubmed: 29990622