Machine learning in multiexposure laser speckle contrast imaging can replace conventional laser Doppler flowmetry.
Adult
Blood Flow Velocity
Calibration
Computer Simulation
Erythrocytes
/ pathology
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Laser-Doppler Flowmetry
/ methods
Lasers
Machine Learning
Male
Microcirculation
Models, Statistical
Monte Carlo Method
Neural Networks, Computer
Perfusion
Regional Blood Flow
Reproducibility of Results
Stochastic Processes
artificial neural networks
blood flow
laser speckle contrast analysis
microcirculation
Journal
Journal of biomedical optics
ISSN: 1560-2281
Titre abrégé: J Biomed Opt
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9605853
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
21
09
2018
accepted:
17
12
2018
entrez:
25
1
2019
pubmed:
25
1
2019
medline:
10
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) enables video rate imaging of blood flow. However, its relation to tissue blood perfusion is nonlinear and depends strongly on exposure time. By contrast, the perfusion estimate from the slower laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) technique has a relationship to blood perfusion that is better understood. Multiexposure LSCI (MELSCI) enables a perfusion estimate closer to the actual perfusion than that using a single exposure time. We present and evaluate a method that utilizes contrasts from seven exposure times between 1 and 64 ms to calculate a perfusion estimate that resembles the perfusion estimate from LDF. The method is based on artificial neural networks (ANN) for fast and accurate processing of MELSCI contrasts to perfusion. The networks are trained using modeling of Doppler histograms and speckle contrasts from tissue models. The importance of accounting for noise is demonstrated. Results show that by using ANN, MELSCI data can be processed to LDF perfusion with high accuracy, with a correlation coefficient R = 1.000 for noise-free data, R = 0.993 when a moderate degree of noise is present, and R = 0.995 for in vivo data from an occlusion-release experiment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30675771
pii: JBO-180558R
doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.24.1.016001
pmc: PMC6985684
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-11Références
J Biomed Opt. 2013 Dec;18(12):127004
pubmed: 24352692
Microvasc Res. 2011 Nov;82(3):326-32
pubmed: 21803051
J Biomed Opt. 1996 Apr;1(2):174-9
pubmed: 23014683
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2016;9:106-20
pubmed: 26929060
J Biomed Opt. 2013 Jun;18(6):066018
pubmed: 23807512
J Biomed Opt. 2010 Mar-Apr;15(2):027015
pubmed: 20459289
Appl Opt. 2005 Apr 1;44(10):1823-30
pubmed: 15813518
J Biomed Opt. 2008 Jan-Feb;13(1):014015
pubmed: 18315373
J Biomed Opt. 2017 Oct;22(10):1-7
pubmed: 29019179
Opt Lett. 2008 Dec 15;33(24):2886-8
pubmed: 19079481
J Biomed Opt. 2016 Dec 1;21(12):126018
pubmed: 28008449
J Biomed Opt. 2016 Jul 1;21(7):76001
pubmed: 27367424
Med Biol Eng Comput. 1984 Jul;22(4):343-8
pubmed: 6235409
J Biomed Opt. 2010 Sep-Oct;15(5):057002
pubmed: 21054118
Opt Express. 2008 Feb 4;16(3):1975-89
pubmed: 18542277
Biomed Opt Express. 2011 Mar 30;2(4):1021-9
pubmed: 21483623
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 May;60(5):1259-65
pubmed: 23232361
Opt Express. 2013 Nov 18;21(23):28902-13
pubmed: 24514404
Biomed Opt Express. 2015 Jun 18;6(7):2588-608
pubmed: 26203384
J Biophotonics. 2018 Feb;11(2):
pubmed: 28700120
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017 Sep;37(9):3097-3109
pubmed: 28112550