Association of Inherited Pathogenic Variants in Checkpoint Kinase 2 (CHEK2) With Susceptibility to Testicular Germ Cell Tumors.
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Apr 2019
01 Apr 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
25
1
2019
medline:
11
2
2020
entrez:
25
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Approximately 50% of the risk for the development of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) is estimated to be heritable, but no mendelian TGCT predisposition genes have yet been identified. It is hypothesized that inherited pathogenic DNA repair gene (DRG) alterations may drive susceptibility to TGCTs. To systematically evaluate the enrichment of germline pathogenic variants in the mendelian cancer predisposition DRGs in patients with TGCTs vs healthy controls. A case-control enrichment analysis was performed from January 2016 to May 2018 to screen for 48 DRGs in 205 unselected men with TGCT and 27 173 ancestry-matched cancer-free individuals from the Exome Aggregation Consortium cohort in the discovery stage. Significant findings were selectively replicated in independent cohorts of 448 unselected men with TGCTs and 442 population-matched controls, as well as 231 high-risk men with TGCTs and 3090 ancestry-matched controls. Statistical analysis took place from January to May 2018. Gene-level enrichment analysis of germline pathogenic variants in individuals with TGCTs relative to cancer-free controls. Among 205 unselected men with TGCTs (mean [SD] age, 33.04 [9.67] years), 22 pathogenic germline DRG variants, one-third of which were in CHEK2 (OMIM 604373), were identified in 20 men (9.8%; 95% CI, 6.1%-14.7%). Unselected men with TGCTs were approximately 4 times more likely to carry germline loss-of-function CHEK2 variants compared with cancer-free individuals from the Exome Aggregation Consortium cohort (odds ratio [OR], 3.87; 95% CI, 1.65-8.86; nominal P = .006; q = 0.018). Similar enrichment was also seen in an independent cohort of 448 unselected Croatian men with TGCTs (mean [SD] age, 31.98 [8.11] years) vs 442 unselected Croatian men without TGCTs (at least 50 years of age at time of sample collection) (OR, >1.4; P = .03) and 231 high-risk men with TGCTs (mean [SD] age, 31.54 [9.24] years) vs 3090 men (all older than 50 years) from the Penn Medicine Biobank (OR, 6.30; 95% CI, 2.34-17.31; P = .001). The low-penetrance CHEK2 variant (p.Ile157Thr) was found to be a Croatian founder TGCT risk variant (OR, 3.93; 95% CI, 1.53-9.95; P = .002). Individuals with the pathogenic CHEK2 loss-of-function variants developed TGCTs 6 years earlier than individuals with CHEK2 wild-type alleles (5.95 years; 95% CI, 1.48-10.42; P = .009). This multicenter case-control analysis of men with or without TGCTs provides evidence for CHEK2 as a novel moderate-penetrance TGCT susceptibility gene, with potential clinical utility. In addition to highlighting DNA-repair deficiency as a potential mechanism driving TGCT susceptibility, this analysis also provides new avenues to explore management strategies and biological investigations for high-risk individuals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30676620
pii: 2722624
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6477
pmc: PMC6459214
mid: NIHMS1012837
doi:
Substances chimiques
Checkpoint Kinase 2
EC 2.7.1.11
CHEK2 protein, human
EC 2.7.11.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
514-522Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : KL2 TR001879
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA164947
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HG002295
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA227388
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R37 CA222574
Pays : United States
Références
Nature. 2016 Nov 30;540(7631):114-118
pubmed: 27905446
Nat Genet. 2017 Jul;49(7):1133-1140
pubmed: 28604728
Oncogene. 2001 Sep 13;20(41):5897-902
pubmed: 11593395
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5757-61
pubmed: 16110032
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2235-42
pubmed: 26014595
Prostate Cancer. 2014;2014:294575
pubmed: 25431674
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 09;5:13889
pubmed: 26349679
Nature. 2001 Apr 12;410(6830):842-7
pubmed: 11298456
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Nov;47(17):2546-51
pubmed: 21807500
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):443-53
pubmed: 27433846
Cancer Res. 2006 Sep 15;66(18):8966-70
pubmed: 16982735
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(4):1355-60
pubmed: 22799331
Nat Genet. 2013 Jun;45(6):680-5
pubmed: 23666239
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Mar;50(4):831-9
pubmed: 24369860
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Jul;13(7):409-19
pubmed: 27296647
Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):33.e1-6
pubmed: 23395239
Oncogene. 2006 Sep 25;25(43):5912-9
pubmed: 16998506
Nat Commun. 2015 Oct 27;6:8690
pubmed: 26503584
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep;13(9):581-8
pubmed: 27296296
EMBO J. 2005 Oct 5;24(19):3411-22
pubmed: 16163388
Eur Urol. 2018 Jun;73(6):828-831
pubmed: 29433971
Nat Commun. 2016 Dec 20;7:13840
pubmed: 27996046
Nature. 2016 Aug 17;536(7616):285-91
pubmed: 27535533
Science. 2014 Jan 31;343(6170):533-6
pubmed: 24482479
Nature. 2014 Jan 16;505(7483):302-8
pubmed: 24429628
Mol Cell. 2009 Sep 24;35(6):818-29
pubmed: 19782031
Am J Hum Genet. 2018 Mar 1;102(3):401-414
pubmed: 29478780
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(5):2051-5
pubmed: 22901170
DNA Cell Biol. 2013 Jun;32(6):329-35
pubmed: 23713947
Nature. 2000 Mar 9;404(6774):201-4
pubmed: 10724175
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 26;3(8):e3062
pubmed: 18725978