The Efficacy and Safety of Vertebral Augmentation: A Second ASBMR Task Force Report.


Journal

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
ISSN: 1523-4681
Titre abrégé: J Bone Miner Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8610640

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2019
Historique:
received: 17 08 2018
revised: 07 11 2018
accepted: 19 11 2018
entrez: 25 1 2019
pubmed: 25 1 2019
medline: 9 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Vertebral augmentation is among the current standards of care to reduce pain in patients with vertebral fractures (VF), yet a lack of consensus regarding efficacy and safety of percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty raises questions on what basis clinicians should choose one therapy over another. Given the lack of consensus in the field, the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) leadership charged this Task Force to address key questions on the efficacy and safety of vertebral augmentation and other nonpharmacological approaches for the treatment of pain after VF. This report details the findings and recommendations of this Task Force. For patients with acutely painful VF, percutaneous vertebroplasty provides no demonstrable clinically significant benefit over placebo. Results did not differ according to duration of pain. There is also insufficient evidence to support kyphoplasty over nonsurgical management, percutaneous vertebroplasty, vertebral body stenting, or KIVA®. There is limited evidence to determine the risk of incident VF or serious adverse effects (AE) related to either percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. No recommendation can be made about harms, but they cannot be excluded. For patients with painful VF, it is unclear whether spinal bracing improves physical function, disability, or quality of life. Exercise may improve mobility and may reduce pain and fear of falling but does not reduce falls or fractures in individuals with VF. General and intervention-specific research recommendations stress the need to reduce study bias and address methodological flaws in study design and data collection. This includes the need for larger sample sizes, inclusion of a placebo control, more data on serious AE, and more research on nonpharmacologic interventions. Routine use of vertebral augmentation is not supported by current evidence. When it is offered, patients should be fully informed about the evidence. Anti-osteoporotic medications reduce the risk of subsequent vertebral fractures by 40-70%. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30677181
doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3653
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3-21

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/P020941/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Auteurs

Peter R Ebeling (PR)

Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Kristina Akesson (K)

Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

Douglas C Bauer (DC)

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Rachelle Buchbinder (R)

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, and Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Richard Eastell (R)

Department of Human Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Howard A Fink (HA)

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, and Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Lora Giangregorio (L)

Department of Kinesiology and Schlegel Research Institute for Aging, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.

Nuria Guanabens (N)

Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Deborah Kado (D)

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

David Kallmes (D)

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Wendy Katzman (W)

Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Alexander Rodriguez (A)

Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Robert Wermers (R)

Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

H Alexander Wilson (HA)

Newport News, VA, USA.

Mary L Bouxsein (ML)

Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH