Expressivity in children's drawings of themselves for adult audiences with varied authority and familiarity.
audiences
authority
drawing
expressivity
familiarity
Journal
The British journal of developmental psychology
ISSN: 2044-835X
Titre abrégé: Br J Dev Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8308022
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
04
07
2018
revised:
18
12
2018
pubmed:
25
1
2019
medline:
6
2
2020
entrez:
25
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study investigated whether children's expressive drawings of themselves vary as a function of audience authority and familiarity. One hundred and seventy-five children, 85 boys and 90 girls, aged between 8 years 1 months and 9 years 2 months (M = 8 years 5 months) were allocated into seven groups: a reference group (n = 25), where no audience was specified, and six audience groups (n = 25 per group) varying by audience type (policeman vs. teacher vs. man) and familiarity (familiar vs. unfamiliar). They drew baseline then happy and sad drawings of themselves, rated affect towards drawings type, and rated perceived audience authority. Audience familiarity and authority impacted expressive drawing strategy use and this varied by gender. There was higher overall expressive strategy use for happy drawings and for girls, and influences of affect type, familiarity, and authority were found. The implications of children's perceptions of audience type on their expressive drawings are discussed. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Children vary their happy and sad expressive drawings for familiar peer and adult audiences. They show more positive expressivity to familiar peer and adult audiences. Children perceive authority differently depending on professional roles. What does this study add? Children's expressive drawings differ depending on audience familiarity and professional role. Greater expressivity for familiar than unfamiliar audiences, with difference varying by perceived authority. For policemen, boys showed more sad expression when unfamiliar and girls showed more happy expression when familiar.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30677787
doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12278
pmc: PMC6767704
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
354-368Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. British Journal of Developmental Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.
Références
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;20(1):68-83
pubmed: 23904178
Memory. 2016;24(1):21-31
pubmed: 25427789
Child Dev. 1996 Jun;67(3):957-73
pubmed: 8706538
J Clin Psychol. 1969 Oct;25(4):432-4
pubmed: 4897354
Child Dev. 2016 Jan-Feb;87(1):176-83
pubmed: 26756868
Dev Psychol. 2004 Nov;40(6):993-1027
pubmed: 15535753
Psychol Psychother. 2005 Jun;78(Pt 2):205-17
pubmed: 16004699
Br J Dev Psychol. 2015 Mar;33(1):123-35
pubmed: 25516441
Psychol Bull. 2000 May;126(3):424-53
pubmed: 10825784
J Pers Assess. 2010 Mar;92(2):186-8
pubmed: 20155568
Dev Psychol. 2005 Jan;41(1):64-74
pubmed: 15656738
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2000 Nov;1(2):27-66
pubmed: 26151980
Child Dev. 1999 Nov-Dec;70(6):1314-24
pubmed: 10621958