A randomised controlled trial of a mitochondrial therapeutic target for bipolar depression: mitochondrial agents, N-acetylcysteine, and placebo.
Adjunctive
Bipolar disorder
Depression
Mitochondria
Nutraceutical
Oxidative stress
Journal
BMC medicine
ISSN: 1741-7015
Titre abrégé: BMC Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190723
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 01 2019
25 01 2019
Historique:
received:
14
08
2018
accepted:
09
01
2019
entrez:
26
1
2019
pubmed:
27
1
2019
medline:
18
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A phasic dysregulation of mitochondrial bioenergetics may operate in bipolar disorder, increased in mania and decreased in depression. We aimed to examine efficacy of two add-on treatments in bipolar depression: N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and NAC with a combination of nutraceutical agents that may increase mitochondrial biogenesis. A three-arm 16-week, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, adjunctive to usual treatment, was conducted. Participants (n = 181) with bipolar disorder and current depressive symptoms were randomised to 2000 mg/day NAC (n = 59), 2000 mg/day NAC with the combination nutraceutical treatment (CT, n = 61), or placebo (n = 61). The primary outcome was change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to week 16. Young Mania Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Improvement and CGI-Severity scales, Patient Global Impression scale, Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation - Range of Impaired Functioning Tool (LIFE-RIFT), and Quality of Life Enjoyment, and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) were secondary outcomes. One hundred forty-eight participants had post-randomisation data and were analysed (NAC = 52, CT = 47, Placebo = 49). No between-group differences were found for the rate of change between baseline and 16 weeks on any of the clinical and functioning variables. Improvements in MADRS, BDRS, SOFAS, and LIFE-RIFT scores from baseline to the week 20 post-discontinuation visit were significantly greater in the CT group compared to those in the placebo. At week 20, the CGI-I was significantly lower in the CT group versus placebo. Gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly greater in the NAC than in the placebo group. These overall negative results, with no significant differences between groups detected at the primary outcome but some positive secondary signals, suggest either delayed benefit of the combination or an improvement of symptoms on withdrawal which warrants further exploration regarding the composition, mechanisms, and application of mitochondrial agents in illnesses characterised by mitochondrial dysfunction. ANZCTR ( ACTRN12612000830897 ).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
A phasic dysregulation of mitochondrial bioenergetics may operate in bipolar disorder, increased in mania and decreased in depression. We aimed to examine efficacy of two add-on treatments in bipolar depression: N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and NAC with a combination of nutraceutical agents that may increase mitochondrial biogenesis.
METHODS
A three-arm 16-week, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, adjunctive to usual treatment, was conducted. Participants (n = 181) with bipolar disorder and current depressive symptoms were randomised to 2000 mg/day NAC (n = 59), 2000 mg/day NAC with the combination nutraceutical treatment (CT, n = 61), or placebo (n = 61). The primary outcome was change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to week 16. Young Mania Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Improvement and CGI-Severity scales, Patient Global Impression scale, Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation - Range of Impaired Functioning Tool (LIFE-RIFT), and Quality of Life Enjoyment, and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) were secondary outcomes.
RESULTS
One hundred forty-eight participants had post-randomisation data and were analysed (NAC = 52, CT = 47, Placebo = 49). No between-group differences were found for the rate of change between baseline and 16 weeks on any of the clinical and functioning variables. Improvements in MADRS, BDRS, SOFAS, and LIFE-RIFT scores from baseline to the week 20 post-discontinuation visit were significantly greater in the CT group compared to those in the placebo. At week 20, the CGI-I was significantly lower in the CT group versus placebo. Gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly greater in the NAC than in the placebo group.
CONCLUSIONS
These overall negative results, with no significant differences between groups detected at the primary outcome but some positive secondary signals, suggest either delayed benefit of the combination or an improvement of symptoms on withdrawal which warrants further exploration regarding the composition, mechanisms, and application of mitochondrial agents in illnesses characterised by mitochondrial dysfunction.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ANZCTR ( ACTRN12612000830897 ).
Identifiants
pubmed: 30678686
doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1257-1
pii: 10.1186/s12916-019-1257-1
pmc: PMC6346513
doi:
Substances chimiques
Acetylcysteine
WYQ7N0BPYC
Banques de données
ANZCTR
['ACTRN12612000830897']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Aug;55:294-321
pubmed: 25957927
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;49(6):499-501
pubmed: 25931574
Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Sep 15;64(6):468-75
pubmed: 18534556
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Sep;68:694-713
pubmed: 27377693
J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;77(4):e457-66
pubmed: 27137430
Schizophr Res. 2018 Sep;199:395-402
pubmed: 29588126
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Apr 18;13(5):293-307
pubmed: 22510887
Braz J Psychiatry. 2015 Jan-Mar;37(1):3-12
pubmed: 25295681
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Mar;30(2):59-66
pubmed: 25438027
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Mar;74(Pt A):1-20
pubmed: 28093238
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Mar;74:38-44
pubmed: 26736040
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Nov;269:658-672
pubmed: 30216918
BMC Med. 2015 Apr 01;13:68
pubmed: 25889215
J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;77(11):e1439-e1446
pubmed: 27736051