The Connected Intensive Care Unit Patient: Exploratory Analyses and Cohort Discovery From a Critical Care Telemedicine Database.
critical care
intensive care units
medical informatics applications
telemedicine
Journal
JMIR medical informatics
ISSN: 2291-9694
Titre abrégé: JMIR Med Inform
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101645109
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Jan 2019
24 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
02
12
2018
accepted:
29
12
2018
revised:
29
12
2018
entrez:
26
1
2019
pubmed:
27
1
2019
medline:
27
1
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Many intensive care units (ICUs) utilize telemedicine in response to an expanding critical care patient population, off-hours coverage, and intensivist shortages, particularly in rural facilities. Advances in digital health technologies, among other reasons, have led to the integration of active, well-networked critical care telemedicine (tele-ICU) systems across the United States, which in turn, provide the ability to generate large-scale remote monitoring data from critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to explore opportunities and challenges of utilizing multisite, multimodal data acquired through critical care telemedicine. Using a publicly available tele-ICU, or electronic ICU (eICU), database, we illustrated the quality and potential uses of remote monitoring data, including cohort discovery for secondary research. Exploratory analyses were performed on the eICU Collaborative Research Database that includes deidentified clinical data collected from adult patients admitted to ICUs between 2014 and 2015. Patient and ICU characteristics, top admission diagnoses, and predictions from clinical scoring systems were extracted and analyzed. Additionally, a case study on respiratory failure patients was conducted to demonstrate research prospects using tele-ICU data. The eICU database spans more than 200 hospitals and over 139,000 ICU patients across the United States with wide-ranging clinical data and diagnoses. Although mixed medical-surgical ICU was the most common critical care setting, patients with cardiovascular conditions accounted for more than 20% of ICU stays, and those with neurological or respiratory illness accounted for nearly 15% of ICU unit stays. The case study on respiratory failure patients showed that cohort discovery using the eICU database can be highly specific, albeit potentially limiting in terms of data provenance and sparsity for certain types of clinical questions. Large-scale remote monitoring data sources, such as the eICU database, have a strong potential to advance the role of critical care telemedicine by serving as a testbed for secondary research as well as for developing and testing tools, including predictive and prescriptive analytical solutions and decision support systems. The resulting tools will also inform coordination of care for critically ill patients, intensivist coverage, and the overall process of critical care telemedicine.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Many intensive care units (ICUs) utilize telemedicine in response to an expanding critical care patient population, off-hours coverage, and intensivist shortages, particularly in rural facilities. Advances in digital health technologies, among other reasons, have led to the integration of active, well-networked critical care telemedicine (tele-ICU) systems across the United States, which in turn, provide the ability to generate large-scale remote monitoring data from critically ill patients.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to explore opportunities and challenges of utilizing multisite, multimodal data acquired through critical care telemedicine. Using a publicly available tele-ICU, or electronic ICU (eICU), database, we illustrated the quality and potential uses of remote monitoring data, including cohort discovery for secondary research.
METHODS
METHODS
Exploratory analyses were performed on the eICU Collaborative Research Database that includes deidentified clinical data collected from adult patients admitted to ICUs between 2014 and 2015. Patient and ICU characteristics, top admission diagnoses, and predictions from clinical scoring systems were extracted and analyzed. Additionally, a case study on respiratory failure patients was conducted to demonstrate research prospects using tele-ICU data.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The eICU database spans more than 200 hospitals and over 139,000 ICU patients across the United States with wide-ranging clinical data and diagnoses. Although mixed medical-surgical ICU was the most common critical care setting, patients with cardiovascular conditions accounted for more than 20% of ICU stays, and those with neurological or respiratory illness accounted for nearly 15% of ICU unit stays. The case study on respiratory failure patients showed that cohort discovery using the eICU database can be highly specific, albeit potentially limiting in terms of data provenance and sparsity for certain types of clinical questions.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Large-scale remote monitoring data sources, such as the eICU database, have a strong potential to advance the role of critical care telemedicine by serving as a testbed for secondary research as well as for developing and testing tools, including predictive and prescriptive analytical solutions and decision support systems. The resulting tools will also inform coordination of care for critically ill patients, intensivist coverage, and the overall process of critical care telemedicine.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30679148
pii: v7i1e13006
doi: 10.2196/13006
pmc: PMC6365875
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e13006Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL007955
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
©Patrick Essay, Tala B Shahin, Baran Balkan, Jarrod Mosier, Vignesh Subbian. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 24.01.2019.
Références
Anaesthesia. 1999 Nov;54(11):1048-54
pubmed: 10540093
Circulation. 2000 Jun 13;101(23):E215-20
pubmed: 10851218
Crit Care Med. 2001 Aug;29(8 Suppl):N183-9
pubmed: 11496041
Arch Surg. 2001 Oct;136(10):1118-23
pubmed: 11585502
Crit Care. 2010;14(2):207
pubmed: 20392287
Crit Care Nurse. 2010 Aug;30(4):46-55; quiz 56
pubmed: 20675821
Crit Care Med. 2011 May;39(5):952-60
pubmed: 21283005
JAMA. 2011 Jun 1;305(21):2227-8
pubmed: 21576623
Crit Care. 2012 Jul 18;16(4):R127
pubmed: 22809335
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Aug;39(8):1396-404
pubmed: 23685609
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 01;3(8):null
pubmed: 23906948
Telemed J E Health. 2014 Oct;20(10):962-71
pubmed: 25225795
Telemed J E Health. 2016 Dec;22(12):971-980
pubmed: 27508454
Comput Cardiol (2010). 2015;42:189-192
pubmed: 27774488
Clin Perinatol. 2017 Sep;44(3):713-728
pubmed: 28802348
Science. 2018 Jun 29;360(6396):1462-1465
pubmed: 29954980
Sci Data. 2018 Sep 11;5:180178
pubmed: 30204154
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:4073-4076
pubmed: 30441251
JAMA. 1995 Feb 8;273(6):483-8
pubmed: 7837367
Anaesthesia. 1998 Oct;53(10):937-43
pubmed: 9893535