How do primary healthcare workers in low-income and middle-income countries obtain information during consultations to aid safe prescribing? A systematic review protocol.
decision-making
health information
lmics
prescribing
primary care
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 01 2019
24 01 2019
Historique:
entrez:
26
1
2019
pubmed:
27
1
2019
medline:
30
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is a wide variety in prescribing by primary healthcare workers in low-income and middle-income countries. While there is much information available, both online and offline, there is variation in quality and relevance to different settings. Acting on incorrect or out-of-date information can lead to inappropriate prescribing and impact on patient safety. The aim of this review is to systematically review the evidence on how primary healthcare workers obtain information during consultations to prescribe safely and appropriately. We will identify relevant articles by searching electronic databases: Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CABI Global Health (Ovid), WHO global health library, POPLINE, Africa-Wide Information (Ebsco), Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (Ebsco), ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Also, the Health Information For All network will be consulted and evidence databases (TRIP database, Epistemonikos, PDQ Evidence) will be searched. We will hand-search reference lists, run citation searches of included studies and email authors of identified papers. Observational and intervention studies involving primary healthcare workers in low-income and middle-income countries who prescribe and/or dispense medication will be included. The primary outcome is the proportion of healthcare workers obtaining information relevant to consultations from different sources. Secondary outcomes are the change in healthcare provider and patient knowledge or behaviour, adverse outcomes and use of resources. We will exclude studies focusing on secondary care. We anticipate a limited scope for meta-analysis and will provide a narrative overview of findings and tabular summaries of extracted data. No ethics approval is required. Findings will be disseminated through the Healthcare Information For All network. CRD42018091088.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30679289
pii: bmjopen-2018-023015
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023015
pmc: PMC6347871
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e023015Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: MHvV is the director of Dutches Consulting Ltd which provides advice to clients in the life sciences.
Références
BMJ. 1997 Jan 11;314(7074):90
pubmed: 9006454
BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;350:g7647
pubmed: 25555855
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Apr 1;32(3):437-452
pubmed: 27993961
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul 27;12:223
pubmed: 22838649
East Afr Med J. 2004 Feb;Suppl:S33-40
pubmed: 15125114
BMJ. 1997 Mar 29;314(7085):980
pubmed: 9099147
Hum Resour Health. 2009 Apr 08;7:30
pubmed: 19356239
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Sep;4(9):e594-6
pubmed: 27539798
Lancet. 2017 Apr 29;389(10080):1680-1681
pubmed: 28463129
Health Policy Plan. 1999 Sep;14(3):291-8
pubmed: 10621246
BMJ. 1997 May 10;314(7091):1418
pubmed: 9161340
Circulation. 2005 Mar 15;111(10):1278-83
pubmed: 15769769