Laparoscopic Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy is Safe for Patients with Peritoneal Metastases from Gastric Cancer and May Lead to Gastrectomy.


Journal

Annals of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1534-4681
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9420840

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2019
Historique:
received: 14 09 2018
pubmed: 27 1 2019
medline: 6 8 2019
entrez: 26 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (LS-HIPEC) is a novel strategy for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) metastatic to the peritoneum. We evaluated the safety profile of LS-HIPEC for patients with positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) or carcinomatosis from GA. Outcomes were reviewed of patients with stage IV GA with peritoneal involvement who received LS-HIPEC from June 2014 to January 2017. LS-HIPEC included a 60-minute perfusion of mitomycin-C (30 mg) and cisplatin (200 mg) with inflow temperatures of 41-42 °C and outflow temperatures of 39-40 °C. A total of 71 LS-HIPEC procedures were performed in 44 patients. At diagnosis, 68% (n = 30) had carcinomatosis and 32% (n = 14) had isolated PPC. Three patients (7%) underwent LS-HIPEC for intractable ascites. All patients initially received systemic chemotherapy, and 20 patients (45%) received pre-procedural chemoradiotherapy. The median number of LS-HIPEC procedures performed per patient was one (range 1-5 procedures). There were no conversions to laparotomy, two outflow catheter obstructions, and one major (Clavien-Dindo grade III) surgical complication within 30 days. A total of seven postoperative adverse hematologic events (> CTCAE 2) were observed in five patients (11%), without any major renal or gastrointestinal adverse events within 30 days. The median overall length of hospital stay after LS-HIPEC was 2 (range 2-11) days. Eleven patients (25%) underwent secondary gastrectomy following resolution of peritoneal cytology. Laparoscopic HIPEC is a safe procedure and may be repeated in patients with peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer. Future studies are required to determine the optimal HIPEC regimen and timing relative to systemic therapy to best minimize morbidity.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (LS-HIPEC) is a novel strategy for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) metastatic to the peritoneum. We evaluated the safety profile of LS-HIPEC for patients with positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) or carcinomatosis from GA.
METHODS METHODS
Outcomes were reviewed of patients with stage IV GA with peritoneal involvement who received LS-HIPEC from June 2014 to January 2017. LS-HIPEC included a 60-minute perfusion of mitomycin-C (30 mg) and cisplatin (200 mg) with inflow temperatures of 41-42 °C and outflow temperatures of 39-40 °C.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 71 LS-HIPEC procedures were performed in 44 patients. At diagnosis, 68% (n = 30) had carcinomatosis and 32% (n = 14) had isolated PPC. Three patients (7%) underwent LS-HIPEC for intractable ascites. All patients initially received systemic chemotherapy, and 20 patients (45%) received pre-procedural chemoradiotherapy. The median number of LS-HIPEC procedures performed per patient was one (range 1-5 procedures). There were no conversions to laparotomy, two outflow catheter obstructions, and one major (Clavien-Dindo grade III) surgical complication within 30 days. A total of seven postoperative adverse hematologic events (> CTCAE 2) were observed in five patients (11%), without any major renal or gastrointestinal adverse events within 30 days. The median overall length of hospital stay after LS-HIPEC was 2 (range 2-11) days. Eleven patients (25%) underwent secondary gastrectomy following resolution of peritoneal cytology.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Laparoscopic HIPEC is a safe procedure and may be repeated in patients with peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer. Future studies are required to determine the optimal HIPEC regimen and timing relative to systemic therapy to best minimize morbidity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30680477
doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-07140-7
pii: 10.1245/s10434-018-07140-7
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1394-1400

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Timothy E Newhook (TE)

Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Annamaria Agnes (A)

Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Mariela Blum (M)

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Jeannelyn S Estrella (JS)

Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Prajnan Das (P)

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Linus Ho (L)

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Jaffer A Ajani (JA)

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Bruce D Minsky (BD)

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Paul Mansfield (P)

Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Brian D Badgwell (BD)

Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. bbadgwell@mdanderson.org.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH