A within-subject clinical trial on the conversion of mandibular two-implant to three-implant overdenture: Patient-centered outcomes and willingness to pay.
clinical trial
dental implants
mandibular prosthesis
overdentures
patient satisfaction
Journal
Clinical oral implants research
ISSN: 1600-0501
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Implants Res
Pays: Denmark
ID NLM: 9105713
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
12
02
2018
revised:
08
01
2019
accepted:
10
01
2019
pubmed:
27
1
2019
medline:
23
10
2019
entrez:
26
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To examine the impact of adding a third midline implant with stud attachment to a mandibular two-implant overdenture on patient-oriented outcomes. In this pre-post design clinical trial, following the standard procedures, mandibular two-implant overdentures of 17 edentulous individuals (61.9 ± 6.6 years) were converted to three-implant overdentures by adding a stud attachment to an unloaded midline implant. Patient-oriented outcomes included patient expectations and satisfaction with implant overdenture as well as willingness to pay the cost of conversion. Data were collected at baseline and at the 6-week follow-up using visual analog and binary scales as well as open-ended questions. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, Spearman's correlation, Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, and the exact sign test. After connecting the third midline implant to the mandibular two-implant overdenture, there was a statistically significant decrease in the anteroposterior movement (p = 0.005) as evaluated by clinicians. Moreover, study participants reported an increase in perceived stability of the overdenture (95% CI; 0.68-1.00, p = 0.002) and in their ability to speak (95% CI; 0.63-1.00, p = 0.008). The addition of a third implant met the expectations of 94% of patients in regard to lower denture stability, 100% for retention, and 82.4% for comfort. The mandibular three-implant overdenture increased patient general satisfaction over a short period of time, but this improvement was not statistically significant. About 80% of patients would recommend this type of prosthesis to their peers but only 47% of them would agree to pay a large increase in the cost of treatment compared to a two-implant overdenture. The addition of a midline third implant to an existing mandibular two-implant overdenture resulted in several improved patient-reported outcomes.
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
218-228Subventions
Organisme : Saudi Arabian Cultural Bureau in Canada
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors Clinical Oral Implants Research Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.