How Women Use Digital Technologies for Health: Qualitative Interview and Focus Group Study.
Australia
apps
digital health
feminist new materialism
online forums
qualitative research
social media
wearable devices
websites
women
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 01 2019
25 01 2019
Historique:
received:
04
07
2018
accepted:
30
10
2018
revised:
30
10
2018
entrez:
26
1
2019
pubmed:
27
1
2019
medline:
22
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A range of digital technologies are available to lay people to find, share, and generate health-related information. Few studies have directed attention specifically to how women are using these technologies from the diverse array available to them. Even fewer have focused on Australian women's use of digital health. The Australian Women and Digital Health Project aimed to investigate which types of digital technologies women used regularly for health-related purposes and which they found most helpful and useful. Qualitative methods-semistructured interviews and focus groups-were employed to shed light on the situated complexities of the participants' enactments of digital health technologies. The project adopted a feminist new materialism theoretical perspective, focusing on the affordances, relational connections, and affective forces that came together to open up or close off the agential capacities generated with and through these enactments. The project comprised two separate studies including a total of 66 women. In study 1, 36 women living in the city of Canberra took part in face-to-face interviews and focus groups, while study 2 involved telephone interviews with 30 women from other areas of Australia. The affordances of search engines to locate health information and websites and social media platforms for providing information and peer support were highly used and valued. Affective forces such as the desire for trust, motivation, empowerment, reassurance, control, care, and connection emerged in the participants' accounts. Agential capacities generated with and through digital health technologies included the capacity to seek and generate information and create a better sense of knowledge and expertise about bodies, illness, and health care, including the women's own bodies and health, that of their families and friends, and that of their often anonymous online social networks. The participants referred time and again to appreciating the feelings of agency and control that using digital health technologies afforded them. When the technologies failed to work as expected, these agential capacities were not realized. Women responded with feelings of frustration, disappointment, and annoyance, leading them to become disenchanted with the possibilities of the digital technologies they had tried. The findings demonstrate the nuanced and complex ways in which the participants were engaging with and contributing to online sources of information and using these sources together with face-to-face encounters with doctors and other health care professionals and friends and family members. They highlight the lay forms of expertise that the women had developed in finding, assessing, and creating health knowledges. The study also emphasized the key role that many women play in providing advice and health care for family members not only as digitally engaged patients but also as digitally engaged carers.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
A range of digital technologies are available to lay people to find, share, and generate health-related information. Few studies have directed attention specifically to how women are using these technologies from the diverse array available to them. Even fewer have focused on Australian women's use of digital health.
OBJECTIVE
The Australian Women and Digital Health Project aimed to investigate which types of digital technologies women used regularly for health-related purposes and which they found most helpful and useful. Qualitative methods-semistructured interviews and focus groups-were employed to shed light on the situated complexities of the participants' enactments of digital health technologies. The project adopted a feminist new materialism theoretical perspective, focusing on the affordances, relational connections, and affective forces that came together to open up or close off the agential capacities generated with and through these enactments.
METHODS
The project comprised two separate studies including a total of 66 women. In study 1, 36 women living in the city of Canberra took part in face-to-face interviews and focus groups, while study 2 involved telephone interviews with 30 women from other areas of Australia.
RESULTS
The affordances of search engines to locate health information and websites and social media platforms for providing information and peer support were highly used and valued. Affective forces such as the desire for trust, motivation, empowerment, reassurance, control, care, and connection emerged in the participants' accounts. Agential capacities generated with and through digital health technologies included the capacity to seek and generate information and create a better sense of knowledge and expertise about bodies, illness, and health care, including the women's own bodies and health, that of their families and friends, and that of their often anonymous online social networks. The participants referred time and again to appreciating the feelings of agency and control that using digital health technologies afforded them. When the technologies failed to work as expected, these agential capacities were not realized. Women responded with feelings of frustration, disappointment, and annoyance, leading them to become disenchanted with the possibilities of the digital technologies they had tried.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings demonstrate the nuanced and complex ways in which the participants were engaging with and contributing to online sources of information and using these sources together with face-to-face encounters with doctors and other health care professionals and friends and family members. They highlight the lay forms of expertise that the women had developed in finding, assessing, and creating health knowledges. The study also emphasized the key role that many women play in providing advice and health care for family members not only as digitally engaged patients but also as digitally engaged carers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30681963
pii: v21i1e11481
doi: 10.2196/11481
pmc: PMC6367665
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e11481Informations de copyright
©Deborah Lupton, Sarah Maslen. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 25.01.2019.
Références
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;93:86-94
pubmed: 23906125
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2017 May 2;2017:6876-6888
pubmed: 28516176
Aust J Prim Health. 2013;19(4):308-12
pubmed: 24004661
Contemp Nurse. 2015;50(1):50-7
pubmed: 26145717
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Apr 20;6(4):e101
pubmed: 29678807
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 09;18(5):e109
pubmed: 27160641
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 23;6(1):e26
pubmed: 29362211
Health Promot Int. 2014 Jun;29(2):349-60
pubmed: 23144236
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 05;19(4):e101
pubmed: 28381394
Women Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;49(5):381-404
pubmed: 19851944
Women Health. 2004;40(1):59-78
pubmed: 15778132
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 18;17(5):e120
pubmed: 25986630
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 19;16(1):171
pubmed: 27435182
Sociol Health Illn. 2007 Jan;29(1):27-45
pubmed: 17286704
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 22;17(6):e156
pubmed: 26099325
Women Birth. 2016 Aug;29(4):368-75
pubmed: 26874938
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Mar 15;6(3):e65
pubmed: 29549071
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Mar 29;12:83
pubmed: 22458767
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 19;19(4):e125
pubmed: 28428170
Aust J Prim Health. 2013;19(4):313-8
pubmed: 23899373
Int J Health Serv. 2009;39(4):725-47
pubmed: 19927412
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Apr 26;6(4):e103
pubmed: 29699971
Cult Health Sex. 2015;17(2):237-51
pubmed: 25339096