Activity painting: PET images of freely defined activity distributions applying a novel phantom technique.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 01 03 2018
accepted: 04 11 2018
entrez: 26 1 2019
pubmed: 27 1 2019
medline: 19 9 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this work was to develop a novel phantom that supports the construction of highly reproducible phantoms with arbitrary activity distributions for PET imaging. It could offer a methodology for answering questions related to texture measurements in PET imaging. The basic idea is to move a point source on a 3-D trajectory in the field of view, while continuously acquiring data. The reconstruction results in a 3-D activity concentration map according to the pathway of the point source. A 22Na calibration point source was attached to a high precision robotic arm system, where the 3-D movement was software controlled. 3-D activity distributions of a homogeneous cube, a sphere, a spherical shell and a heart shape were simulated. These distributions were used to measure uniformity and to characterize reproducibility. Two potential applications using the lesion simulation method are presented: evaluation in changes of textural properties related to the position in the PET field of view; scanner comparison based on visual and quantitative evaluation of texture features. A lesion with volume of 50x50x50 mm3 can be simulated during approximately 1 hour. The reproducibility of the movement was found to be >99%. The coefficients of variation of the voxels within a simulated homogeneous cube was 2.34%. Based on 5 consecutive and independent measurements of a 36 mm diameter hot sphere, the coefficient of variation of the mean activity concentration was 0.68%. We obtained up to 18% differences within the values of investigated textural indexes, when measuring a lesion in different radial positions of the PET field of view. In comparison of two different human PET scanners the percentage differences between heterogeneity parameters were in the range of 5-55%. After harmonizing the voxel sizes this range reduced to 2-16%. The general activity distributions provided by the two different vendor show high similarity visually. For the demonstration of the flexibility of this method, the same pattern was also simulated on a small animal PET scanner giving similar results, both quantitatively and visually. 3-D motion of a point source in the PET field of view is capable to create an irregular shaped activity distribution with high reproducibility.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30682024
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207658
pii: PONE-D-18-05123
pmc: PMC6347296
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0207658

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

A.F, A.K.K, F.N, I.G are employed by ScanoMed Ltd. There are no patents, products in development, or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Références

Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2003 Apr;18(2):201-7
pubmed: 12804045
Ann Nucl Med. 2016 Jul;30(6):393-9
pubmed: 26955819
EJNMMI Phys. 2016 Dec;3(1):22
pubmed: 27682837
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 17;9(12):e115510
pubmed: 25517987
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Nov 15;102(4):1083-1089
pubmed: 29395627
Acta Oncol. 2010 Oct;49(7):1012-6
pubmed: 20831489
Med Phys. 2013 Nov;40(11):112506
pubmed: 24320465
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Oct;40(10):1507-15
pubmed: 23754762
J Nucl Med. 2018 Feb;59(2):189-193
pubmed: 29175982
J Nucl Med. 2015 Nov;56(11):1642-4
pubmed: 26294296
J Nucl Med. 2017 Mar;58(3):387-392
pubmed: 27754906
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jan 21;62(2):652-668
pubmed: 28033121
J Nucl Med. 2012 May;53(5):693-700
pubmed: 22454484
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Jan 7;55(1):221-36
pubmed: 20009194
J Nucl Med. 2011 Mar;52(3):369-78
pubmed: 21321270
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 13;11(10):e0164113
pubmed: 27736888
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2015 Oct;2(4):041002
pubmed: 26251842
J Nucl Med. 2017 Sep;58(9):1511-1518
pubmed: 28450566
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Mar;29(3):938-49
pubmed: 20199927
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Nov 7;56(21):N247-61
pubmed: 21983701
Med Phys. 2012 Sep;39(9):5353-61
pubmed: 22957603
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jan;44(1):151-165
pubmed: 27271051
Phys Med Biol. 1996 Oct;41(10):2207-19
pubmed: 8912391
Semin Nucl Med. 2011 Nov;41(6):437-48
pubmed: 21978446
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed). 2018 Jul - Aug;37(4):229-236
pubmed: 29678630
EJNMMI Phys. 2015 Dec;2(1):13
pubmed: 26501814
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Mar;48(4):441-6
pubmed: 22257792
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006 Jul;25(7):907-21
pubmed: 16827491
EJNMMI Phys. 2016 Dec;3(1):26
pubmed: 27783373
Nat Commun. 2014 Jun 03;5:4006
pubmed: 24892406
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Oct;40(11):1662-71
pubmed: 23857457
J Nucl Med. 2017 Mar;58(3):365-366
pubmed: 27811126
J Nucl Med. 1998 May;39(5):904-11
pubmed: 9591599
Eur Radiol. 2017 Nov;27(11):4498-4509
pubmed: 28567548
J Nucl Med. 2013 Oct;54(10):1825-32
pubmed: 23990683
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Jun 7;59(11):2727-46
pubmed: 24800813
Med Phys. 2017 Jan;44(1):221-226
pubmed: 28066888
J Nucl Med. 2018 Aug;59(8):1321-1328
pubmed: 29301932

Auteurs

Attila Forgacs (A)

Scanomed Nuclear Medicine Center, Debrecen, Hungary.
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

Piroska Kallos-Balogh (P)

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

Ferenc Nagy (F)

Scanomed Nuclear Medicine Center, Debrecen, Hungary.

Aron K Krizsan (AK)

Scanomed Nuclear Medicine Center, Debrecen, Hungary.

Ildiko Garai (I)

Scanomed Nuclear Medicine Center, Debrecen, Hungary.
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

Lajos Tron (L)

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

Magnus Dahlbom (M)

Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, University of California at Los Angeles, United States of America.

Laszlo Balkay (L)

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH