Effects of combined GIP and GLP-1 infusion on energy intake, appetite and energy expenditure in overweight/obese individuals: a randomised, crossover study.
Adult
Aged
Appetite
/ drug effects
Blood Glucose
/ analysis
Calorimetry
Cross-Over Studies
Double-Blind Method
Energy Intake
/ drug effects
Energy Metabolism
/ drug effects
Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide
/ administration & dosage
Glucagon
/ metabolism
Glucagon-Like Peptide 1
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Insulin
/ metabolism
Male
Middle Aged
Obesity
/ drug therapy
Overweight
/ drug therapy
Weight Loss
Appetite
Dual receptor agonism
Energy expenditure
Energy intake
Glucagon-like peptide 1
Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide
Obesity
Overweight
Journal
Diabetologia
ISSN: 1432-0428
Titre abrégé: Diabetologia
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0006777
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
received:
12
11
2018
accepted:
07
12
2018
pubmed:
27
1
2019
medline:
19
2
2020
entrez:
27
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) reduces appetite and energy intake in humans, whereas the other incretin hormone, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), seems to have no effect on eating behaviour. Interestingly, studies in rodents have shown that concomitant activation of GIP and GLP-1 receptors may potentiate the satiety-promoting effect of GLP-1, and a novel dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist was recently shown to trigger greater weight losses compared with a GLP-1 receptor agonist in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study was to delineate the effects of combined GIP and GLP-1 receptor activation on energy intake, appetite and resting energy expenditure in humans. We examined 17 overweight/obese men in a crossover design with 5 study days. On day 1, a 50 g OGTT was performed; on the following 4 study days, the men received an isoglycaemic i.v. glucose infusion (IIGI) plus saline (154 mmol/l NaCl; placebo), GIP (4 pmol kg Energy intake was significantly reduced during IIGI+GLP-1 compared with IIGI+saline infusion (2715 ± 409 vs 4483 ± 568 kJ [mean ± SEM, n = 17], p = 0.014), whereas there were no significant differences in energy intake during IIGI+GIP (4062 ± 520 kJ) or IIGI+GIP+GLP-1 (3875 ± 451 kJ) infusion compared with IIGI+saline (p = 0.590 and p = 0.364, respectively). Energy intake was higher during IIGI+GIP+GLP-1 compared with IIGI+GLP-1 infusion (p = 0.039). While GLP-1 infusion lowered energy intake in overweight/obese men, simultaneous GIP infusion did not potentiate this GLP-1-mediated effect. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02598791 FUNDING: This study was supported by grants from the Innovation Fund Denmark and the Vissing Foundation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30683945
doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4810-0
pii: 10.1007/s00125-018-4810-0
doi:
Substances chimiques
Blood Glucose
0
Insulin
0
Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide
59392-49-3
Glucagon-Like Peptide 1
89750-14-1
Glucagon
9007-92-5
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02598791']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
665-675Références
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009 Aug;71(2):195-201
pubmed: 19178509
Clin Sci (Lond). 2011 Aug;121(3):107-17
pubmed: 21332446
J Biol Chem. 2008 Jun 27;283(26):18365-76
pubmed: 18420580
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Feb;21(2):320-5
pubmed: 23404781
J Clin Invest. 1998 Feb 1;101(3):515-20
pubmed: 9449682
Cell Metab. 2013 Jun 4;17(6):819-37
pubmed: 23684623
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001 Jun;25(6):781-92
pubmed: 11439290
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Sep;86(9):4382-9
pubmed: 11549680
Eur J Clin Invest. 1997 Jan;27(1):10-6
pubmed: 9041371
Diabetes Care. 2015 Jan;38(1):e7-8
pubmed: 25538323
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Aug;96(8):2519-24
pubmed: 21593115
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1996 Aug;50(3):253-64
pubmed: 8894385
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Dec;293(6):E1746-55
pubmed: 17848629
Trends Mol Med. 2016 May;22(5):359-376
pubmed: 27038883
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Jun;14(6):500-10
pubmed: 22171657
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40156
pubmed: 22802954
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999 Mar;23(3):304-11
pubmed: 10193877
Br J Pharmacol. 2016 Jan;173(1):27-38
pubmed: 26359804
Sci Transl Med. 2013 Oct 30;5(209):209ra151
pubmed: 24174327
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Jan;33(1):46-53
pubmed: 19002144
Regul Pept. 1994 Apr 14;51(1):63-74
pubmed: 8036284
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Oct;19(10):1436-1445
pubmed: 28730694
Lancet. 2018 Nov 17;392(10160):2180-2193
pubmed: 30293770
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jan;20(1):60-68
pubmed: 28598027
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Mar;298(3):E614-21
pubmed: 19996386
Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 May;87(5):1277-81
pubmed: 18469250
Diabetes. 1994 Apr;43(4):535-9
pubmed: 8138058
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993 Apr;76(4):912-7
pubmed: 8473405
Cell Metab. 2017 Aug 1;26(2):343-352.e2
pubmed: 28768173
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Jan;88(1):220-4
pubmed: 12519856
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Oct;88(10):4897-903
pubmed: 14557471
Diabetes. 2011 Apr;60(4):1270-6
pubmed: 21330636
Nat Med. 2002 Jul;8(7):738-42
pubmed: 12068290
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Sep;19(9):1242-1251
pubmed: 28266779
Mol Metab. 2018 Dec;18:1-2
pubmed: 30352740
Regul Pept. 2006 Dec 10;137(3):168-72
pubmed: 16934887
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Aug;97(2):258-66
pubmed: 22446097