Medical oncology job satisfaction: Results of a global survey.


Journal

Seminars in oncology
ISSN: 1532-8708
Titre abrégé: Semin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0420432

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
received: 04 12 2018
accepted: 15 12 2018
pubmed: 28 1 2019
medline: 3 5 2019
entrez: 28 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

While physician burnout is increasingly recognized, little is known about medical oncologist job satisfaction, and the factors associated with low satisfaction. Here, we report the results of an international survey of medical oncologists. An online survey was distributed using a modified snowball methodology via national oncology societies to chemotherapy-prescribing physicians in 65 countries. Oncologist job satisfaction was assessed by asking, "On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate your satisfaction as an oncologist? 1 = unsatisfying, 10 = satisfying." Low, moderate and high job satisfaction was defined as scores of 1-6, 7-8, and 9-10, respectively. 1,115 physicians from 42 countries completed the survey. Overall job satisfaction rates were 20% (222/1,115), 51% (573/1,115), and 29% (320/1,115) for low-, moderate-, and high-satisfaction, respectively. Respondents with low job satisfaction were younger (P = 0.001) and had fewer years in clinical practice (P = 0.013) compared to those with high satisfaction. Increasing hours worked by per week (p = 0.042), decreasing annual weeks of paid vacation (P = 0.007), being on-call every night (P = 0.016), higher clinic volumes (P = 0.004) and lack of access to on-site radiotherapy (P = 0.049), palliative care (P = 0.005), and chemotherapy pharmacists (P = 0.033) were associated with low-job satisfaction. Respondents with low-job satisfaction were less likely to discuss prognosis with their patients compared to those with moderate or high job satisfaction (median 45% of patients v 65% v 75%, P < 0.001). Globally, 1 in 5 medical oncologists report low job satisfaction. The main correlates of job satisfaction are related to system-level pressures resulting in less time for quality patient care and personal resilience. Improving oncologist job satisfaction will require new approaches to models of care delivery.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
While physician burnout is increasingly recognized, little is known about medical oncologist job satisfaction, and the factors associated with low satisfaction. Here, we report the results of an international survey of medical oncologists.
METHODS
An online survey was distributed using a modified snowball methodology via national oncology societies to chemotherapy-prescribing physicians in 65 countries. Oncologist job satisfaction was assessed by asking, "On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate your satisfaction as an oncologist? 1 = unsatisfying, 10 = satisfying." Low, moderate and high job satisfaction was defined as scores of 1-6, 7-8, and 9-10, respectively.
RESULTS
1,115 physicians from 42 countries completed the survey. Overall job satisfaction rates were 20% (222/1,115), 51% (573/1,115), and 29% (320/1,115) for low-, moderate-, and high-satisfaction, respectively. Respondents with low job satisfaction were younger (P = 0.001) and had fewer years in clinical practice (P = 0.013) compared to those with high satisfaction. Increasing hours worked by per week (p = 0.042), decreasing annual weeks of paid vacation (P = 0.007), being on-call every night (P = 0.016), higher clinic volumes (P = 0.004) and lack of access to on-site radiotherapy (P = 0.049), palliative care (P = 0.005), and chemotherapy pharmacists (P = 0.033) were associated with low-job satisfaction. Respondents with low-job satisfaction were less likely to discuss prognosis with their patients compared to those with moderate or high job satisfaction (median 45% of patients v 65% v 75%, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Globally, 1 in 5 medical oncologists report low job satisfaction. The main correlates of job satisfaction are related to system-level pressures resulting in less time for quality patient care and personal resilience. Improving oncologist job satisfaction will require new approaches to models of care delivery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30685074
pii: S0093-7754(18)30259-8
doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2018.12.006
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

73-82

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Michael J Raphael (MJ)

Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Canada; Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

Adam Fundytus (A)

Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Canada.

Wilma M Hopman (WM)

Kingston General Hospital Research Institute, Kingston, Canada; Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

Verna Vanderpuye (V)

Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana.

Bostjan Seruga (B)

Division of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Gilberto Lopes (G)

University of Miami and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, United States.

Nazik Hammad (N)

Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

Manju Sengar (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.

Michael D Brundage (MD)

Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Canada; Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada; Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

Richard Sullivan (R)

Institute of Cancer Policy, King's College London, & King's Health Partners Comprehensive Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom.

Christopher M Booth (CM)

Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Canada; Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada; Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada. Electronic address: booth@queensu.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH